Tag Archives: Eric Holder

Towards a Smarter Policing Strategy?

Yesterday, Attorney General Eric Holder announced changes to the Federal policy in prosecuting drug crimes, basically getting Federal prosecutors to charge low-level offenders with less harsh crimes.  This action would essentially bypass the mandatory minimum sentencing rules whose primary accomplishment is to increase the already unsustainable numbers of Americans in prison.  This is a baby step in admitting that we’ve been losing the War on Drugs for a long time:

Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. announced Monday that low-level, nonviolent drug offenders with no ties to gangs or large-scale drug organizations will no longer be charged with offenses that impose severe mandatory sentences.

The new Justice Department policy is part of a comprehensive prison reform package that Holder unveiled in a speech to the American Bar Association in San Francisco. He also introduced a policy to reduce sentences for elderly, nonviolent inmates and find alternatives to prison for nonviolent criminals.

Baby steps, but a good one. Congress should step up and bolster this effort with legislation that gets at resetting the justice scales — judges won’t have their hands tied and prosecutors have to work for their convictions.

“We must face the reality that, as it stands, our system is, in too many ways, broken,” Holder said. “And with an outsized, unnecessarily large prison population, we need to ensure that incarceration is used to punish, to deter and to rehabilitate — not merely to warehouse and to forget.”

The Justice Reinvestment Initiative (or portions of this effort) are being implemented in 17 or 18 states in an effort to reduce incarceration density but also to reduce costs. States have been looking at the large line item that is their prison budget and are looking for ways to reduce that number — including implementing drug courts and increasing treatment opportunities which seem to have some success. The Feds themselves have a $7B budget item for prisons, and that number is only going to increase. The DOJ doesn’t want to become a department that can only afford to manage those they incarcerate. But at bottom, the Justice Reinvestment Initiative wants to be a data driven approach to dealing with crime — understand the contours of the problem, what has historically worked, what has not and start investing in what works.

Any shift in charging offenders would change the incentives of the police departments whose very life blood for the past few decades has been the War on Drugs. But to get there, the politicians who keep selling Tough on Crime rhetoric need to start telling constituents that the old policies cost too much and deliver too little. Which is to say that you trust what Holder had to say yesterday. He and President Obama waved their hands at the medical marijuana initiatives, saying that they had other things to worry about. Unfortunately, they misled a bunch of folks — and Federal officials are raiding and trying to shut down medical marijuana shops all over the West.

Th nation’s Chief Law Enforcement Officer picking up some of what some states are beginning to come to grips with — that the War On Drugs failed to stop any drugs, has been hugely disruptive of communities and costs too much — is a step in the right direction. And it is incredibly important to start taking more steps to rein in the War on Drugs.

Contemptible Congress

When I was a wee lad, I had the utmost respect for Congress. I was in awe of my then Congressman, Byron Rodgers (D-Denver) who was the essence of a public servant. I was good friends with Congresswoman Pat Schroeder and Congressman & Senator Tim Wirth (who was a neighbor). That all changed after I moved to DC and began working for the government. I discovered that many of the 539 Members of Congress (including the delegates from DC, Puerto Rico, Guam and the Virgin Islands) didn’t really give a damn about their constituents. It was all about getting face time on TV to make it seem as though they were doing something.

This afternoon, Rep. Darrell Issa, chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, pushed through a resolution holding Attorney General Eric Holder in “Contempt of Congress.” Better add my name to that resolution, Issa, because I hold you and the Teabag 112th Congress in the utmost contempt. Obstruction is the motto of this Congress. Sure, Boner Boehner, Cantor, et al claim that it’s not their fault the President cannot enact his agenda. They say he had 2 years of total control. What they don’t bother mentioning is that Senate rethuglicans filibustered almost everything, requiring 60 votes to enact legislation.

But let’s get back to Issa. After being named as chair of his committee, he said that he “want[ed] seven hearings a week, times 40 weeks.”

He also wants to organize aggressive oversight beyond his committee and plans to refer inquiries to other House panels, drawing even more incoming GOP chairmen to the cause of investigating the executive branch.

He wasn’t then or isn’t now interested in making government efficient. He is on a mission to harangue the Obama Administration. He’s trying to make AG Holder his prize trophy to hang on his wall. He’s trying to show everyone he has big balls. But he doesn’t.

So who is the real Darrell Issa? It appears that he might have a criminal past. Well, he is in Congress.

Rep. Darrell Issa’s past includes arrests for weapons charges and auto theft, suspicions of arson, and accusations of intimidation with a gun, but you’d hardly know it from the media’s recent coverage of the new chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. While Issa was substantially mentioned in 15 articles in the nation’s largest newspapers since the last election — including several major profiles — only one of those articles mentioned any of these allegations. Likewise, interviewers did not ask Issa about his alleged criminal past in any of the cable or network interviews he sat for during that period.

Arson! Auto Theft! Assault with a Deadly Weapon! Insurance Fraud!

Issa is a despicable human being and an even worse congressman. He should be the one who’s facing a contempt citation.

Some Real Terrorism News

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced today that some of those allegedly responsible for the 9/11 attacks will be tried in federal – not military – court.

“Today we announce a step forward in bringing those we believe were responsible for the 9/11 attacks and the attack on the USS Cole to justice,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.  “For over two hundred years, our nation has relied on a faithful adherence to the rule of law to bring criminals to justice and provide accountability to victims.  Once again we will ask our legal system to rise to that challenge, and I am confident it will answer the call with fairness and justice.”

The New York Times reports that the case of “Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-described mastermind of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, and four other men accused in the plot will be prosecuted in federal court in New York City.” Those that are accused of attacking the U.S.S. Cole, however, will be tried by the military.

In other news, White House counsel Greg Craig, whose parents showed their mean streak when naming him, will be stepping down. Craig was the one given the responsibility of closing the Guantanamo Bay military prison by the end of this year, something which he failed at miserably.

Holder Chooses Experience Over Politics

The new Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder, is beginning to keep his word by making appointments based on experience rather than political litmus tests, say did you graduate from Regents University.

Said one prosecutor:

The attorney general is really making sure that people understand there’s a new sheriff in town, and prosecutors are going to have to abide by the rules just like everybody else. It’s no secret there have been major problems with the integrity of the Department of Justice over the past eight years, from Washington all the way down to assistant U.S. attorneys. That’s why [Holder] has to take such a public stance on this.

Competence over ideology. Apparently elections do matter.