Have at it!
Have at it!
“Hillary is hitting me with tremendous commercials, some of it said in entertainment, somebody who’s been very vicious to me, Rosie o’donnell, I said very tough things to her, and I think everybody would agree she deserves it, and nobody feels sorry for her. I was going to say something extremely rough to Hillary, to her family, and I said to myself, I can’t do it. I just can’t do it. It’s inappropriate. It’s not nice, but she spent hundreds of millions of dollars on negative ads on me, many of which are absolutely untrue.”
So has his team:
Donald Trump’s campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, on Tuesday morning said that Trump displayed “great temperament and restraint” by choosing not to mention Bill Clinton’s sex scandals during the debate.
During an interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Conway said that Hillary Clinton sometimes looked “glib” while Trump was speaking during the debate before pivoting to Trump’s decision not to bring up Bill Clinton.
“I have to say, certainly as a woman, I appreciated the restraint at the end — I’m not sure I would have been able to exercise it myself — but restraint is a virtue, and it’s a presidential virtue,” Conway said. “To tell Hillary Clinton, after she accused him of being terrible with women, to tell Hillary Clinton, ‘I was prepared to go rough tonight and I’m not going to do it because your husband and your daughter are here,’ that is going to grow in importance over the next couple of days as the moment of great temperament and restraint.”
And this:
“The president of the United States, her husband, disgraced this country with what he did in the Oval Office and she didn’t just stand by him, she attacked Monica Lewinsky,” Giuliani said. “And after being married to Bill Clinton for 20 years, if you didn’t know the moment Monica Lewinsky said that Bill Clinton violated her that she was telling the truth, then you’re too stupid to be president.”
So it seems obvious to me that Trump is going there – of course, he hasn’t said it to her face yet, but he is laying the ground work to get quite explicit with this line of attack.
It makes perfect sense if you understand who Trump is. He has no problem with Bill Clinton’s infidelity, just like he has zero problem with his own infidelity. Nope, in Trump’s world a man cheating is the woman’s fault. Period.
It’s her fault for letting herself go – for gaining weight, for not being hot enough, for aging
It’s her fault for not meeting his needs – for not supporting and adoring him, as well as sexually
It’s her fault for being “frigid” or… a lesbian (remember that one?)
It’s her fault because he deserves the newest model on the market – and she should understand this!
If that’s the way you view infidelity then, of course, Bill’s cheating isn’t really his fault – it’s Hillary’s. How else could Trump, a serial adulterer, not see his own adultery as wrong? How else could Trump, a man who’s done exactly what Bill Clinton did, consider using infidelity as a weapon against Hillary – the person who was cheated on? Easy. In Trump’s view, it’s not the man’s fault.
So yeah, this issue is going to take center stage. The only question is if Trump has the nerve to say it to Hillary’s face. I’m not sure of that – however, it’s obviously bouncing around in his head, which greatly increases the odds of it spewing out of his mouth during one of the next debates. The man has no impulse control. Back him into a corner and brace yourself for all sorts of crazy. Add to that that Trump seems to think that this issue is his secret weapon – it’s why he keeps teasing it. WTH? Only in Trump world is the person who was cheated on in the the wrong – that it was their fault. Newsflash: Most people don’t feel this way.
I’m 100% certain Hillary has prepared for this line of attack – and I’m certain her response will be pitch perfect. In fact, having a woman candidate running against Trump is pure perfection. He knows how to deal with men (and does so quite effectively). He believes that a man has the right to share a debate stage with him – not so for a woman. Go back and look at the GOP primary debates. When was the one time Trump took a big hit? Yep, it came when he went after Carly Fiorina personally.
Let me start by saying, if Hillary had behaved and said the things Trump said and did last night this election would be over. There would be no spin. It would be done. Talk about double standards. Hats off to her. She did an amazing job. Yep, amazing. She kept her cool and played him like a fiddle. That was no easy task. Don’t believe me? Then you should try debating an unhinged liar who constantly interrupts and interjects like a three year old who missed their nap – one who has no qualms about saying anything. How do you even prepare for that? In every other Presidential debate the candidates prepared by knowing each others policy positions and then pointed out why their policies were better. Trump has no policies.
Trumps behavior was truly unhinged – and he’s continued to behave like a spoiled brat ever since walking off the stage.
“Hillary is hitting me with tremendous commercials, some of it said in entertainment, somebody who’s been very vicious to me, Rosie o’donnell, I said very tough things to her, and I think everybody would agree she deserves it, and nobody feels sorry for her. I was going to say something extremely rough to Hillary, to her family, and I said to myself, I can’t do it. I just can’t do it. It’s inappropriate. It’s not nice, but she spent hundreds of millions of dollars on negative ads on me, many of which are absolutely untrue.”
He seems to think he deserves credit for not saying this on stage. He acts like saying this to reporters on TV is different somehow. Buckle up, because Bill Clinton’s sexcapades are going front and center with the Trump campaign. Not sure how you blame Hillary for this, but I’m sure The Donald will do what he usually does – claim Hillary wasn’t hot enough, thin enough, etc. to satisfy her man. It is his “go to” with women. Kellyann Conway better think long and hard before letting Donald off the leash on this topic. Oops! Too late!
Donald Trump’s campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, on Tuesday morning said that Trump displayed “great temperament and restraint” by choosing not to mention Bill Clinton’s sex scandals during the debate.
During an interview on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Conway said that Hillary Clinton sometimes looked “glib” while Trump was speaking during the debate before pivoting to Trump’s decision not to bring up Bill Clinton.
“I have to say, certainly as a woman, I appreciated the restraint at the end — I’m not sure I would have been able to exercise it myself — but restraint is a virtue, and it’s a presidential virtue,” Conway said. “To tell Hillary Clinton, after she accused him of being terrible with women, to tell Hillary Clinton, ‘I was prepared to go rough tonight and I’m not going to do it because your husband and your daughter are here,’ that is going to grow in importance over the next couple of days as the moment of great temperament and restraint.”
Notice how – dare I say it? she plays the gender card. Luckily she doesn’t play it well. She claims, essentially, that she would have lost it. It’s mind boggling how out of touch that comment is. Donald Trump calls women pigs, fat, ugly, etc., but that’s okay because Bill cheated on Hillary. See? No difference.
His next whine is classic:
“I had a problem with a microphone that didn’t work,” he said on “Fox and Friends.” “My microphone was terrible. I wonder, was it set up that way on purpose? My microphone, in the room they couldn’t hear me, you know, it was going on and off. Which isn’t exactly great. I wonder if it was set up that way, but it was terrible.”
“It was on and off, and it was much lower than hers. I don’t want to believe in conspiracy theories, of course, but it was much lower than hers and it was crackling, and she didn’t have that problem,” he added. “That to me was a bad problem, you have a bum mic, it’s not exactly good.”
If only his mic was bad. That would have been the best thing that could have happened to him last night.
And then we move onto his latest comments about Miss Universe:
“She was the worst we ever had. The worst, the absolute worst. She was impossible, and she was a Miss Universe contestant and ultimately a winner who they had a tremendously difficult time with as Miss Universe,” he said on “Fox and Friends.”
“She was the winner, and, you know, she gained a massive amount of weight, and it was a real problem. We had a real problem. Not only that, her attitude, and we had a real problem with her,” Trump continued. “So Hillary went back into the years and she found this girl. This was many years ago, and found the girl and talked about her like she was Mother Teresa, and it wasn’t quite that way, but that’s okay. Hillary has to do what she has to do. I see what’s happening in the polls.”
Watch the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8ZM58O_gBo
Miss Piggy? Miss Housekeeping? Wow. A racist misogynist on full display. The most startling thing about Trump is the way he confirms every accusation against him.
Oh, and he deleted his tweet about climate change being a hoax started by China. And, and, and… he drew more attention to his tax returns, how paying taxes is for suckers, how the housing collapse was good for his business. There’s just soooo much.
But here’s the silver lining. Trump put all of these topics, including the birtherism, back in the spotlight. Hillary got under his skin. She did it by keeping her cool (and let’s face it – she had to keep her cool or else that would have been the only story today), and not coming across as a “scold” or “shrill” Ugh. I hate those terms. And don’t kid yourself, her decorum was under constant scrutiny last night. I kept reading how she was – wait for it – smiling too much. Really? Let’s just agree that there is no correct number of smiles when it comes to women.
So congratulations, Hillary. If you were anyone else the entire country would be in agreement that you buried Trump last night; that you showed that he was completely unqualified to be President (I didn’t even touch on his NATO and foreign policy gibberish) and had the temperament of a toddler. Letting him ramble on and interrupt was perfect – it let Trump be Trump.
So now that you’ve read my ramblings (because, honestly, there’s just too much Trump nonsense to address) I have a question. Does Trump pull out of the next two debates? I’m beginning to think he will.
This started out as a comment, but morphed into a post. Last night I was asked a question on the DNC Convention post, “Was Bill Clinton’s speech sexist?”
No.
Oh, you want more? Ok.
Here are my thoughts on Bill’s speech. I disagree with Maddow. It wasn’t sexist, but it was a fascinating gender role reversal. Bill Clinton was the first man to give the traditional First Lady speech.
The role of the First Lady speech is to share personal stories of her and the candidate’s life together, to show what a good and loving parent the candidate is, to remind everyone of their spouses accomplishments, their strengths, etc.. Basically, the First Lady speech is an reminder and introduction to the candidate by the person who knows them best.
Bill did just that.
He begins with how they met, stressing the fact that, not only did she introduce herself to him, but that she turned down his marriage proposal two times. The stories he shared were deeply personal; The visuals he drew powerful. By the end of these stories we see why he wanted to build a life with her as a partner. See? First Lady speech.
That part was interesting when you consider how it was flipped. We’re very familiar with the other side of the story: The man asked her three times to marry him – which shows his determination, that he works for his goals and is focused. Bill Clinton showed us the other side – not of a woman “playing hard to get” but of a women who had her own dreams and career and how, together, they forged their future.
I’m probably going to get my next points out of order, so I’ll just label them by topic.
Her early career. First, wow. I wasn’t aware of everything she had done. Calling out segregated schools. Putting counselors in elementary schools. Pre-K. Helping children with special needs and disabilities. Giving low income parents the tools they need to help their children – talk about speaking my language.
She has a ton of accomplishments – most of which people (especially young people) have no idea about. That was/is one of the most frustrating things about this election season. Reducing Hillary to a caricature was not only unfair, it was completely dishonest. It also shut down any sort of discussion. Disagreeing with certain policies is fine, painting her as the most horrible person ever is not.
Let me say this, in my lifetime I can’t remember a Presidential candidate who has had such an amazing resume outside of their holding office. Carter’s post Presidency works springs to mind. To me, that’s admirable. Hillary accomplished so many things without holding office. She actually did the hard work, the ground work, the work that doesn’t get acknowledged by simply casting a vote or signing a bill into law. Bill highlighting these achievements mattered and resonated with me. Bill flipped the old (and tired) saying “behind every great man there’s a great woman” on its head. No where in this speech did Bill place her behind him, she was at his side, and in many instances, ahead of him working on her own things.
Parenting. This subject is always tricky for women. If you have a successful career it’s way too often assumed that you must have dropped the ball on parenting. Green candidate, Jill Stein, showed us how this is done by tweeting about Hillary Clinton on Mother’s Day:
I agree w/ Hillary, it’s time to elect a woman for President. But I want that President to reflect the values of being a mother. #MothersDay
— Dr. Jill Stein (@DrJillStein) May 8, 2016
That tweet reveals far more about Jill Stein than Hillary Clinton. Stein isn’t even original in her sexism, just nasty. It isn’t as if mothers everywhere haven’t had to defend their decisions, career, etc. to justify their life choices and demonstrate that they “reflect the values of being a mother.”
The “being a good mother” (aka superwoman) is a classic sexist attack. Don’t believe me? Okay, then tell me when was the last time you heard anyone wonder if a male politician is a good enough dad? Or how they’d balance raising children and a career.
And here’s an FYI and completely off topic: Many people have no idea how tired “I’m all for a woman (POC, and other minorities) President (or any other position), just not this woman (POC, and other minorities)” is. Maybe it’s because they have no idea how often women, POC, and other minorities hear this line. Not kidding, we hear it all the time.
Back to the speech…
Basically Bill Clinton’s speech was about Hillary – who she is, her accomplishments, etc.. One of his most powerful points (and one she’s made many times herself) is that while you may not support her, she will support you. Just look at her resume. She’s done the hard, non-glamorous, out of the limelight work. If you weren’t aware of that (and you really should have been aware of a lot of it) then the First Man spelled it out – just like every First Lady before him.
Here’s your convention thread!
4:56 – Beginning nominating speeches and then onto Roll call votes.
If you’re watching, this thread’s for you!
Trump goes after Cruz because… well… we knew he would.
Via TPM (go read the whole thing!):
“Somebody got booed the hell out of a place by thousands and thousands of people,” Trump said. “There wasn’t one person in the room — not one. And then they said there may not be unity. Unity? There wasn’t one person in the room, including the Texas delegation, right? Honestly, he may have ruined his political career. I feel so badly. I feel so badly.”
As bad as he claimed to feel, Trump made it clear he does not need Cruz on his side to win the presidency.
“You know, he’ll come and endorse over the next little while,” he said. “He’ll — because he has no choice. But I don’t want his endorsement. What difference does it make? And I don’t want his endorsement. I have such great — I don’t want his endorsement. Just — Ted, stay home, relax, enjoy yourself.”
“Again, I don’t want his endorsement,” he said. “If he gives it, I will not accept it. Just so you understand. If he gives it — I will not accept it.”
Oh my. Trump spits on a Cruz endorsement – but not white supremacists. He even goes back to the claim about Cruz’s father being involved with JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald. Aaaand he keeps going:
“I think Heidi Cruz is a great person. I think it’s the best thing he’s got going and his kids if you want to know the truth,” Trump said. “In a certain way, although he’s got good intellect but he doesn’t know how to use it. And he was a good debater but he didn’t go well in the debate against me. According to every poll. I mean, every poll, this great debater except he lost in every single debate. <strong>So that takes care of the Heidi thing.</strong> Because Heidi is a terrific woman.” [emphasis mine]
Good thing he took care of the Heidi thing. I swear, Cruz knew exactly how Trump would respond and set him up. I need more popcorn!
Via Slate:
“Conservative radio personality Laura Ingraham closed her Republican National Convention speech this way.”

Via The Hill:
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) will meet privately with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton on Friday, the Washington Post reported.The meeting comes one day after Warren formally endorsed Clinton, and amid rampant speculation that Warren is being considered as a possible running mate for Clinton.The two women have spoken several times in recent weeks, including a 30-minute conversation, the Post reported.[…}A Thursday report said Warren is considering joining Clinton’s ticket if asked, but has some concerns, including whether a two-woman ticket is a good idea.
This is one of the most powerful things I’ve ever read. I’m going to highlight some passages, but you should read the whole thing.
Here’s some background:
Stanford University student Brock Allen Turner was accused last year of sexually assaulting an unconscious and intoxicated woman outside an on-campus fraternity party. Turner, then 19, was a member of the college swim team and had aspirations for the 2016 Olympic Games.
This week, he was found guilty of sexual assault.
According to the San Jose Mercury-News, a jury of eight men and four women convicted Turner on Wednesday of three felony charges: assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated woman, sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object and sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object.
[…]
Turner was arrested on Jan. 18, 2015 after two graduate students who were cycling by a Kappa Alpha party spotted him “thrusting his hips atop an unconscious woman lying on the ground.”
One of the grad students, Peter Jonsson, allegedly yelled at Turner, prompting him to jump off the woman. Jonsson then pursued Turner, who ran from the scene.
Meanwhile, the other grad student, Carl Arndt, rushed to help the victim, a woman identified only as “Jane Doe.” She was reportedly unconscious but breathing.
Brock Turner, 20, was convicted of three felony charges: assault with intent to commit rape of an intoxicated woman, sexually penetrating an intoxicated person with a foreign object and sexually penetrating an unconscious person with a foreign object.
Six months in county jail and probation. However… it probably won’t even be six months.
The judge, Aaron Perksy, cited Turner’s age and lack of criminal history as factors in his decision, saying, “A prison sentence would have a severe impact on him … I think he will not be a danger to others.”
After the hearing, Santa Clara County district attorney Jeff Rosen slammed the sentencing, which will likely result in Turner spending three months behind bars – a fraction of the maximum 14 years he was potentially facing.
“The punishment does not fit the crime.”
Here are some excerpts, but you need to read her entire statement:
One day, I was at work, scrolling through the news on my phone, and came across an article. In it, I read and learned for the first time about how I was found unconscious, with my hair disheveled, long necklace wrapped around my neck, bra pulled out of my dress, dress pulled off over my shoulders and pulled up above my waist, that I was butt naked all the way down to my boots, legs spread apart, and had been penetrated by a foreign object by someone I did not recognize. This was how I learned what happened to me, sitting at my desk reading the news at work. I learned what happened to me the same time everyone else in the world learned what happened to me. That’s when the pine needles in my hair made sense, they didn’t fall from a tree. He had taken off my underwear, his fingers had been inside of me. I don’t even know this person. I still don’t know this person. When I read about me like this, I said, this can’t be me.
This can’t be me. I could not digest or accept any of this information. I could not imagine my family having to read about this online. I kept reading. In the next paragraph, I read something that I will never forgive; I read that according to him, I liked it. I liked it. Again, I do not have words for these feelings.
At the bottom of the article, after I learned about the graphic details of my own sexual assault, the article listed his swimming times. She was found breathing, unresponsive with her underwear six inches away from her bare stomach curled in fetal position. By the way, he’s really good at swimming. Throw in my mile time if that’s what we’re doing. I’m good at cooking, put that in there, I think the end is where you list your extra-curriculars to cancel out all the sickening things that’ve happened.
Yeah, this “promising future” stuff needs to stop. And she sums this up later in her statement:
The probation officer weighed the fact that he has surrendered a hard earned swimming scholarship. If I had been sexually assaulted by an un-athletic guy from a community college, what would his sentence be? If a first time offender from an underprivileged background was accused of three felonies and displayed no accountability for his actions other than drinking, what would his sentence be? How fast he swims does not lessen the impact of what happened to me.
Think about that for a while.
When I was told to be prepared in case we didn’t win, I said, I can’t prepare for that. He was guilty the minute I woke up. No one can talk me out of the hurt he caused me. Worst of all, I was warned, because he now knows you don’t remember, he is going to get to write the script. He can say whatever he wants and no one can contest it. I had no power, I had no voice, I was defenseless. My memory loss would be used against me. My testimony was weak, was incomplete, and I was made to believe that perhaps, I am not enough to win this. That’s so damaging. His attorney constantly reminded the jury, the only one we can believe is Brock, because she doesn’t remember. That helplessness was traumatizing.
Instead of taking time to heal, I was taking time to recall the night in excruciating detail, in order to prepare for the attorney’s questions that would be invasive, aggressive, and designed to steer me off course, to contradict myself, my sister, phrased in ways to manipulate my answers. Instead of his attorney saying, Did you notice any abrasions? He said, You didn’t notice any abrasions, right? This was a game of strategy, as if I could be tricked out of my own worth. The sexual assault had been so clear, but instead, here I was at the trial, answering question like:
How old are you? How much do you weigh? What did you eat that day? Well what did you have for dinner? Who made dinner? Did you drink with dinner? No, not even water? When did you drink? How much did you drink? What container did you drink out of? Who gave you the drink? How much do you usually drink? Who dropped you off at this party? At what time? But where exactly? What were you wearing? Why were you going to this party? What’ d you do when you got there? Are you sure you did that? But what time did you do that? What does this text mean? Who were you texting? When did you urinate? Where did you urinate? With whom did you urinate outside? Was your phone on silent when your sister called? Do you remember silencing it? Really because on page 53 I’d like to point out that you said it was set to ring. Did you drink in college? You said you were a party animal? How many times did you black out? Did you party at frats? Are you serious with your boyfriend? Are you sexually active with him? When did you start dating? Would you ever cheat? Do you have a history of cheating? What do you mean when you said you wanted to reward him? Do you remember what time you woke up? Were you wearing your cardigan? What color was your cardigan? Do you remember any more from that night? No? Okay, we’ll let Brock fill it in.
Okay, we’ll let Brock fill it in? Moving on.
And then it came time for him to testify. This is where I became revictimized. I want to remind you, the night after it happened he said he never planned to take me back to his dorm. He said he didn’t know why we were behind a dumpster. He got up to leave because he wasn’t feeling well when he was suddenly chased and attacked. Then he learned I could not remember.
So one year later, as predicted, a new dialogue emerged. Brock had a strange new story, almost sounded like a poorly written young adult novel with kissing and dancing and hand holding and lovingly tumbling onto the ground, and most importantly in this new story, there was suddenly consent. One year after the incident, he remembered, oh yeah, by the way she actually said yes, to everything, so.
See? Brock did fill it in. He “filled it in” with a new story. But that story doesn’t add up:
Next in the story, two people approached you. You ran because you said you felt scared. I argue that you were scared because you’d be caught, not because you were scared of two terrifying Swedish grad students. The idea that you thought you were being attacked out of the blue was ludicrous. That it had nothing to do with you being on top my unconscious body. You were caught red handed, with no explanation. When they tackled you why didn’t say, “Stop! Everything’s okay, go ask her, she’s right over there, she’ll tell you.” I mean you had just asked for my consent, right? I was awake, right? When the policeman arrived and interviewed the evil Swede who tackled you, he was crying so hard he couldn’t speak because of what he’d seen. Also, if you really did think they were dangerous, you just abandoned a half-naked girl to run and save yourself. No matter which way you frame it, it doesn’t make sense.
Thank god for the Swedish grad students. Without them I doubt Brock would have stepped foot inside a police station or court room.
My family had to see pictures of my head strapped to a gurney full of pine needles, of my body in the dirt with my eyes closed, dress hiked up, limbs limp in the dark. And then even after that, my family had to listen to your attorney say, the pictures were after the fact, we can dismiss them. To say, yes her nurse confirmed there was redness and abrasions inside her, but that’s what happens when you finger someone, and he’s already admitted to that. To listen to him use my own sister against me. To listen him attempt to paint of a picture of me, the seductive party animal, as if somehow that would make it so that I had this coming for me. To listen to him say I sounded drunk on the phone because I’m silly and that’s my goofy way of speaking. To point out that in the voicemail, I said I would reward my boyfriend and we all know what I was thinking. I assure you my rewards program is non-transferable, especially to any nameless man that approaches me.
Yeah, that’s a big problem. Viewing sex with one man as transferable to another man.
But the icing on the Brock Turner cake is this:
You said, you are in the process of establishing a program for high school and college students in which you speak about your experience to “speak out against the college campus drinking culture and the sexual promiscuity that goes along with that.”
Speak out against campus drinking culture. That’s what we’re speaking out against? You think that’s what I’ve spent the past year fighting for? Not awareness about campus sexual assault, or rape, or learning to recognize consent. Campus drinking culture. Down with Jack Daniels. Down with Skyy Vodka. If you want talk to high school kids about drinking go to an AA meeting. You realize, having a drinking problem is different than drinking and then forcefully trying to have sex with someone? Show men how to respect women, not how to drink less.
Drinking culture and the sexual promiscuity that goes along with that. Goes along with that, like a side effect, like fries on the side of your order. Where does promiscuity even come into play? I don’t see headlines that read, Brock Turner, Guilty of drinking too much and the sexual promiscuity that goes along with that. Campus Sexaul Assault. There’s your first powerpoint slide.
[…]
By definition rape is the absence of promiscuity, rape is the absence of consent, and it perturbs me deeply that he can’t even see that distinction.
Promiscuity? Quick question: Has anyone ever heard the word “promiscuous” used in relation to a man? I haven’t, but maybe I’ve missed something over the years.
She then calls him out. Perfectly.
I have done enough explaining. You do not get to shrug your shoulders and be confused anymore. You do not get to pretend that there were no red flags. You do not get to not know why you ran. You have been convicted of violating me with malicious intent, and all you can admit to is consuming alcohol. Do not talk about the sad way your life was upturned because alcohol made you do bad things. Figure out how to take responsibility for your own conduct.
Lastly you said, I want to show people that one night of drinking can ruin a life.
Ruin a life, one life, yours, you forgot about mine.
Convenient confusion. Funny how the two grad students who came across the scene weren’t confused. Funny how Brock Turner was super drunk and super coherent (when he needed to fill in the details) at the same time. And if we believe his lame excuse he should be banned from alcohol consumption his entire life – and if anyone sees him having a drink he should be arrested immediately, since he admits this is how alcohol impacts him. No? Why not?
The problem with this story is that it’s all too familiar. She writes at one point: “Sometimes I think, if I hadn’t gone, then this never would’ve happened. But then I realized, it would have happened, just to somebody else.” I agree. The vast majority of men would never sexually assault or rape, but the ones that do have been shown to be repeat offenders. We need to stop giving these guys cover.
Here’s a handy video that everyone should watch. Consent is not difficult. Really. It’s not.
Congratulations! We’ve finally succeeded in making the “Both sides do it” claim a reality.
Via TPM (Be sure to watch the videos):
At the end of a Donald Trump rally in San Jose, California, on Thursday night, protesters began throwing eggs and punches at Trump supporters leaving the event, according to several news reports.
[…]
Several fights broke out between Trump protesters and supporters. One man was punched and knocked to the ground, leading one person’s arrest, according to CNN. And at another point, a crowd surrounded a Trump supporter, punching him in the face, CNN reported.
[…]
A video from Marcus DiPaola, described by the Washington Post as a freelance photographer, shows one instance of someone getting punched in the face.
[…]
ABC News also reported that protesters smashed the taillights of a car they believed belonged to a Trump supporter and also began banging on police cars.
Protesters jumped on cars, threw eggs and water bottles at Trump supporters, according to the Washington Post. The paper also reported that protesters took “Make America Great Again” hats and burned them.
[…]
In one video posted to YouTube, a Trump supporter with blood on his head and neck told reporters that someone grabbed his Trump sign, began following him, calling him a racist, and spitting on him.
What the hell is going on? There is no excuse for this behavior – and if you think there is you have a serious problem. If you come here touting conspiracy theories about how these were really Trump supporters you have even bigger problems. Our government endures due to a peaceful exchanging of power through elections. Yes, Trump introduced violence into this election – and up until recently he 100% owned that – but we should know better. Lord knows, we crow about knowing better often enough. I’m actually beginning to doubt that claim, since it seems to not take much to have us raising our fists and throwing things. Behaving like adults is so 2008/2012.
So, non-Trump supporters behaving like Trump supporters hurts us. This behavior has only resulted in validating the “Both sides do it” argument. Congratulations.
John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign chair, condemned the violence: “Violence against supporters of any candidate has no place in this election.” Good. Keep it up.