Obama comes out swinging on SCOTUS appointment fight

Filed in National by on February 24, 2016

Read this. You will agree that, even with the most advanced diamond tipped drilling equipment, Obama’s carapace of cool can not be penetrated.

“I’m going to do my job,” Obama told reporters in the Oval Office. “I recognize the politics are hard for them [Senate Republicans] because the easier thing to do is to give in to the most extreme voices within their party and stand pat and do nothing. But that’s not our job. Our job is to fulfill our constitutional duties.”

Translation: Everyone knows who the problem is.

…once there is “an actual nominee” rather than “an abstraction” about filling the vacancy left by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death, the American public will get the chance to weigh that person’s qualifications.

“I think it will be very difficult for Mr. McConnell to explain how, if the the public concludes that this person is well qualified, that the Senate should stand in the way simply for political reasons,” he said. “We’ll see what happens and I think the situation may evolve over time. I don’t expect Mitch Mcconnell to say that is the case today.”

Translation: They can talk tough now, but they have never held up very well to public shaming.

…there is no precedent which demands a President not fill a Supreme Court seat during his last year in office, and said he’s months away from being a “lame duck.”

“It’s not in the text of the Constitution,” Obama said. “Ironically, these are Republicans who say they believe in reading the text of the Constitution and focusing on the intent of the Constitution. None of the Founding Fathers thought that, when it comes to the President carrying out his duties, he should do it for three years and on the last year stop doing it.”

Translation: No translation needed. That was a straight up punch to the balls.

The credibility of the high court is at stake, he said, as the judicial appointment process gets more difficult every year. Obama said that “deterioration” would only continue if Senate Republicans “take a posture that defies the Constitution, defies logic, and is not supported by tradition.”

Translation: Republicans don’t give a fuck about their own credibility because they flush that years ago. However, Americans care about the credibility of the court.

Obama also said he’s spoken with lawmakers and “told them I’m sympathetic” to the political pressures they face from their constituents and the party base. He also said he thinks Republicans’ remarks about blocking a nominee are disingenuous.

“There’s not a lot of vigor when they defend the position they’re taking when they defend their point. They’re pretty sheepish about it when they make those comments,” he said.

Translation: They’ll fold as they have in the past.

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (8)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. pandora says:

    I am really going to miss him.

  2. bamboozer says:

    The interesting part of all this is that McConnell could have easily tied this up in the senate long term, this is a self inflicted wound. But he is right to some extent in that the American people are not fixated on the court, damage may be minimal. Bummer as the Republicans deserve all the hell that can be mustered on this one.

  3. Tom Kline says:

    Obama makes W look like a superstar..

  4. Jesse Garcia says:

    History has a tendency to repeat itself especially when all parameters are perfectly aligned. In 1931 an aspiring political figure was able to advance his political ambitions when constant political squabbling along political parties resulted in an ineffective government.
    Since the beginning of our current presidential administration there has been a rift between the two political parties that has resulted in making our government dangerously close to dysfunctional.
    Our founding fathers must be turning in their graves to witness the state to which their House has gotten to. If we havent learned from the mistakes of the past could it be possible that we are repeating them?

  5. Jason330 says:

    Mistakes of the past? We can’t even learn from the mistakes of the present for fuck sake.

  6. Jason330 says:

    But .. yes, I agree. We are careening toward fascism.

  7. mouse says:

    Do republicans have some sort of alternative reality? Is that why they hate empirical science?

  8. Dorian Gray says:

    Sandoval has withdrawn, if he was ever in in the first instance.