General Assembly Post-Game Wrap-Up/Pre-Game Show: Weds., June 24, 2015

Filed in Delaware by on June 24, 2015

The Del-Tech stench grows fouler by the hour.  Despite the fact that no public notice was given, as required by Senate rules, the Senate Finance Commitee (illegally) met today and voted the Del-Tech Relief Act out of committee.  It’s on today’s agenda, just as it was on yesterday’s agenda.  The difference being that only one Senate rule was violated instead of the two rules that were violated in order for it to be placed on yesterday’s agenda. Make no mistake. The committee met because of what we wrote here yesterday.  They’re gonna try to railroad this bill through, and every homeowner will pay w/o having any say over the so-called ‘Community College Infrastructure Fund’.

As Al Mascitti pointed out yesterday, this is not the first time this exact same scheme has been proposed by Del-Tech. When Lonnie George did it, he at least announced the legislation in January, which gave legislators and the public enough (or, for those of you supported it, too much) time to reject it for the blatant rip-off it was.  It’s no coincidence that Mark Brainard and the bill’s supporters waited until June 11 to introduce the bill and try to sneak it through w/o any public input. The bill still sucks. As Al also pointed out, tuition at Del-Tech is far below the national average, and a very modest increase in that tuition would pay for this scheme w/o bilking homeowners who have no interest in Del-Tech and have no idea they’re about to be bilked. I call on many of the fine legislators who inexplicably have signed onto this bill to put the brakes on this cynical maneuver.

The Senate defeated the second leg of a constitutional amendment that would have prohibited bail for certain violent offenses other than murder.  The bill required a 2/3 majority, and didn’t muster a simple majority, 7 Y, 11 N, and 3 NV. Didn’t I tell you that the second (and final) leg was always tougher? I’m glad that SB 126(Ennis) was defeated. Get this: The bill would have ‘created a presumption’  that “a covered firefighter who has heart disease, hypertension, lung disease or certain cancers contracted the occupational disease arising out of and in the course of actions in the line of duty.”  Uh, sure. Because they had to be occupational diseases, right?

Oh, jeezus. The House passed the opt-out bill, but added an amendment removing the provision that 11th graders may opt-out as well.  The bill now returns to the Senate where it will hopefully receive final approval.

Here’s yesterday’s Session Activity Report.

Today’s committee meetings are not as chockful o’ bills as I might have suspected. I think it’s because leaders in each chamber made every effort to get committees to clear as many of each chamber’s own bills in order to provide enough time for consideration in both houses. Of course, some bills will be introduced and passed by waiving the rules, and they’re often the bills to fear the most. Anyway, today I will simply focus on house bills in house committees and senate bills in senate committees. I’ll assume that I will have previously covered any bills of interest that have passed one house and moved to the other.

House Committee highlights:

*Hmmm, more hootch at auto races. What could possibly go wrong? In the Business Lapdog Committee.

*Hoo boy, those downstaters are at it again.  Hey, why not elect the members of the Sussex Tech School Board instead of having the Governor appoint them? What a distinguished crew that would be. Education Committee.

Senate Committee highlights:

*Hmmm (I know, I find I use that term more as sessions near the end), here’s yet another downstate-inspired bill. The bill appears designed to provide more compensation from the state to Kent and Sussex Counties for properties owned by the State. Community/County Affairs Committee.

*Loads of nominations for the Executive Committee to consider.  You can click on the Session Activity Report above to access the entire list.

* When it comes to public health, Sen. Bethany Hall-Long has been an invaluable asset to people who need services. Both SB 142 and SB 148 would expand urgent and preventative dental care to Medicaid recipients under certain circumstances. In the Health & Social Services Committee.

Sen. Harris McDowell holds the dubious distinction of sponsoring both the worst bill (the Del-Tech cash grab) and the best bill on today’s Senate Agenda. SB 130:

defines criteria for any local government to promote economic development by entering into an agreement with the Department of Transportation to create transit-oriented development districts, called “Complete Community Enterprise Districts”. Complete Community Enterprise Districts may be designated in downtown or urban core areas, traditional towns or villages, or regional activity centers. They are characterized by their mix of land uses, efficient use of public infrastructure, efficient use of public services and multiple modes of public transportation combined with environmentally friendly private transportation.

I love this bill. It has bipartisan support (as opposed to the Del-Tech cash grab which, truth be told, other than Mike Ramone, appears to be a Democratic inside job), and is progressive in that it can (figuratively) pave the way for a future that is both economically and environmentally friendly.

Finally, I can’t help but highlight a brand new bill which raises this question: “What the bleep are they thinking?”

Ladeez and gentlemen, may I introduce to you HB 207(Bolden), which is the first leg of a constitutional amendment that would, wait for it, ‘…increase the term of office for members of the House of Representatives to four years and members of the Senate to six years.‘  Yes, we’re talking the Delaware General Assembly, meaning that, while our Congress Critter is elected every two years, our state reps would only have to face the voters every four years.  And our State Senators could be even more aloof from their constituents.  I have a serious question: With the (inexplicable) exception of Rep. Peterman, who has been absent for virtually this entire session, the other sponsors are from the City of Wilmington.  Cassandra, or someone, any idea why this appears to be an idea that appeals virtually solely to members of the city delegation? This is a serious question and I have no answer.  The bill’s not going anywhere, of course.  Just trying to understand the mindset of the sponsors.

OK, kids, have at it!

Tags: , , ,

About the Author ()

Comments (15)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

Sites That Link to this Post

  1. Visit Homepage | June 24, 2015
  1. John Manifold says:

    Nice to see that Sally Buttner’s been nominated for the UIAB.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Our elected officials, what a great job their doing. Thanks for the update EL, you won’t see this in the News Journal.

  3. Jason330 says:

    All of Ennis’ constituents appear to be volunteer fire fighters.
    I am an Ennis constituent.
    Therefor, I am an volunteer firefighter.

    I never realized I was a volunteer firefighter, but the logic is unassailable.

  4. Andy says:

    Is Rep Peterman taking lessons from Senator Bonini who gets paid not to attend committee hearings

  5. While SB 130 has a laudable premise, it is a very poorly written series of text amendments that are fiddling with standing law, hard won law, like the DelCODE’s NCC Quality of Life Act. It deserves to be a Resolution not a bill. Not a bill that was never even shown to the counties elected officials or anyone in the civic community and introduced late in June.

    With little state level and absolutely no county level public input or review, (it got one Senate Committee hearing held days after introduction), if this passes today, it will again escape public hearing under the suspension of rules in these last remaining days.

    The Civic League for NCC and the Save Our County group are recommending that either NCC be stripped from the bill or it be tabled. What is the rush? No one in NCC executive or council had seen the bill before it was introduced even though Karen Peterson made the recommendation to the authors months ago that they do so, as cited in an email she wrote a few days ago:

    “As for SB 130, a draft of this bill was presented to me several months ago with a request (from a colleague) that I review it and comment on it. I did as I was asked and concluded that the bill was poorly-written, confusing, vague, and a bad idea (from a land-use perspective). That’s why my name is not listed as a sponsor. I suggested that the author of the bill meet with NCC land-use officials, DelDOT officials, and Vic Singer before proceeding with the bill. I have no way of knowing if any of that was done.”

  6. cassandra_m says:

    why this appears to be an idea that appeals virtually solely to members of the city delegation?

    Frankly, I think that rep. Bolden is tired of having to fend off a challenger every two years. The others are likely feeling the reality of current Wilmington politics — it gets tougher to turn out folks and the money that is used to turn out some of them is beginning to dry up. And I think that the rest of the City delegation is pretty safe in supporting this. A bunch of relatively safe seats can afford to be the tip of the spear here — for something that a majority of these folks will likely vote for. Gerald Brady is probably feeling Rob Kessler breathing down his neck (with good reason), etc. Even though this amendment probably wouldn’t help many of them once it is passed.

  7. SSDD says:

    SB 137…removed from agenda and back to the ready list.

  8. Andy: Rep. Peterman was ill when he got reelected. He doesn’t seem to be getting better. His constituents knew it, but reelected him anyway. Hope he’s got someone good doing his constituent work for him.

    SSDD: It’s encouraging that SB 137 was removed from the agenda, but it can be called up at any time under a Motion to Suspend Rules. Or, it can be put back on a future agenda.

    Keep your eyes open and thanks!

  9. No On Crony Tax says:

    They don’t have the votes to pass 137.

  10. Mike Matthews says:

    Kim Williams’s EXCELLENT charter school audit bill (HB 168) was FINALLY released from committee after chairman Earl Jaques intentionally kept it bottled up for a week, thereby depriving it of a House vote AND THEN the needed Senate Committee hearing before the end of the session. I guess the charter schools have bought one more year of not having to be held accountable for their bookkeeping. Nice that it’s finally out though.

  11. Mike: The bill is not necessarily dead for the year. If it passes the House tomorrow, it could very well be worked under a Motion to Suspend Rules in the Senate. Especially if the bill is placed on a ‘Must List’, which is a list that one house gives the other to prioritize bills it wants worked. And especially if there is a senator who really wants the bill to pass. A lot of bills get worked that way the last few session days. Some for the better, some for the worse.

    As of now, there is no House Agenda posted for tomorrow.

  12. Mike Matthews says:

    Funny. Just after I posted that I said “suspend the rules!” You’re correct. I’m not a huge fan of suspending the rules, but I think this bill is fairly “clean” and feel suspension could be an OK thing.

  13. Well, you’ll see a lot of this abbreviation over the last days of session: (MSTR). Motion to Suspend Rules. Either on the agenda or on the must lists that are rarely made public until right before the list is to be considered.

    BTW, there IS a posted Senate Agenda for tomorrow:

    http://legis.delaware.gov/legislature.nsf/FSMain?OpenFrameset&Frame=right&src=/LIS/lis148.nsf/senateagenda

  14. This is not promising. The House has posted its agenda, and the Williams bill is not on it:

    http://legis.delaware.gov/legislature.nsf/FSMain?OpenFrameset&Frame=right&src=/LIS/lis148.nsf/houseagenda

    Mike, you might want to make a call or two…