In Which We Find Neither Accountability or Fiscal Sensibility in the Wilmington City Council — AGAIN

Filed in Delaware by on June 18, 2015

Tonight, the Wilmington City Council will vote on an amendment to the budget to add more management staff to the WPD. They will do that without having any hearings, with little notice to the public and without Bud Freel (the Finance Chair) in attendance. Councilman Freel is one of the few points of fiscal accountability (heck of any accountability) in the City Council and doing this without him available (guess Council President Gregory did not offer Bud first class tickets to come back to vote) and without a good public airing is good government malpractice. But then, we are talking about a group of people who aren’t much interested in good government — or, frankly, in representing their constituents. Here is what is being voted on:

This Ordinance is being presented by the Administration for City Council’s review and approval. If approved, Council would be amending the Fiscal Year 2016 General Operating Budget to fund four positions for the Wilmington Police Department, three of which were recommended by the Wilmington Public Safety Strategies Commission. The positions are two Police Inspectors, a Chief Information Officer and a Communications Director. The Ordinance would fund the $827,000 needed for the new positions by reducing FY 2016 police overtime funding by $400,000 and reducing the projected FY 2016 budget surplus by $427,000. The Ordinance also increases the authorized strength of the WPD by two positions for a total of 322 police officer positions.

The WPSSC did not recommend these positions. it recommended a Deputy Chief Position who would be responsible for formulating and implementing a comprehensive safety strategy for the city. Reducing that to Inspector pretty much makes this into a think tank position — with someone who will have no authority to implement anything outside of the people who report to him. Of course. the Chief insists that all of the Inspectors will work and play well together, even though they do not now. Which is a serious management problem. And this City Council is taking them at their word that this will somehow magically work. Even so — the WPD could hire these Inspectors from outside of the department. But they plan to promote from within — which further extends the status quo — and makes sure that the the $827K cost is much closer to $1M when you count in the pension costs. Which are NOT in the $827K. Got that? The City Council has made one step in the right direction in asking the WPD to fund a portion of these positions from the presumed savings the WPD would have in their overtime budget. But Theo Gregory makes this MUCH worse by asking the Council to fund the rest from a surplus that has yet to materialize.

What’s wrong with this picture?

I’ll add to this that the Mayor and the Chief’s response to the WPSSC has been to pretty much declare victory and try to turn the page — getting as much money from Wilmington taxpayers as they can. There’s no accountability whatsoever in their response — and really, if you look at this closely, you’ll note that they claim to have already done much of what the WPSSC has called for. Even though there is still a rash of killing and shootings and even though there is no way for anyone to be able to measure whether they’ve made real progress here and even though the WPD still claims to need more money to have more management to oversee what he claims is already implemented. Yet here we are, with the Wilmington City Council ready to endorse the Chief’s vaporware AND ready to give them more money for it.

This mess gets even better — this is the City Council’s official announcement of its endorsement of the vaporware and its intent to spend money that does not exist. But check this out:

Wilmington City Council President Theo Gregory said today that he has emphasized to the Williams Administration the need for greater public accountability as well as improved collaboration regarding the findings of a State crime commission. Gregory said he discussed those subjects in recent meetings with Administration officials regarding a budget amendment that the Mayor is asking Council to consider.

This goes on to say that Council will recommend some accountability scheme, but if they are serious about getting any cooperation here, they’d get this process down and in writing before they take a vote to approve the positions or the money. Otherwise, they’ve badly played their cards here and is what I expect will happen. Much like how badly they played their cards over the Commission report for the first WPD budget. Clarifying and amending 18 of the Administration’s responses to the WPSSC report don’t mean much unless the public can see them — and that means that you will likely not see much from the Administration once they get their approvals. But go read the whole thing. It is a masterpiece of promises that are broken right now — because you’ll never see any of this accountability once the positions are approved and funded. And notice that this Council won’t go as far to tell the Administration that if there is no surplus or their overtime efficiencies are not achieved — they can’t count on the Council to bail them out. Right? And why is Gregory concerned about getting Council votes for this mess? That is the administration’s problem, not his.

I don’t mind telling you that I’m always angry at just how cavalier both the Administration and City Council is about the safety of the citizens of Wilmington. But just throwing in the towel right now seems like suicide — at a time when Chemours is very loudly reconsidering its location in Wilmington, there is no one in charge down at French St at all invested in even making it LOOK like this city could rationally manage itself.

If you live in Wilmington, please call or email your Councilmember and the At Large members to tell them to vote NO on this boondoggle. Tell them to get something real from the WPD in terms of a commitment to change and better leadership. This is (I think) the 1st and 2nd reading of this, so there is time for this Council to be more deliberate, to get WAY more public input and to build in some real commitments from the City. But call or write now and keep calling and writing. And while you are at it — if you know anyone in the city who would be a great upgrade from anyone in this current crowd of Councilpeople, let me know. Seriously. These people need a serious challenge if they are just going to be invested in the usual incompetence here.

Tags: , , , ,

About the Author ()

"You don't make progress by standing on the sidelines, whimpering and complaining. You make progress by implementing ideas." -Shirley Chisholm

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. cassandra_m says:

    I’m going to add to this: several of the WPD officers (most pretty junior) that I talk to have been pretty demoralized by the Administration’s lack of embrace of the WPSSC report. Where they thought that they might get some cultural change (I can’t tell you how disgusted some of these guys are by the work ethic of some of their superiors) they get this. Nothing but new management, promoted from the same crowd that got them here in the first place. A few of them have seriously approached me to ask if was possible for the Governor to take over the WPD until there could be new management. That’s pretty remarkable. On top of that, the Administration — for all of their embrace of Community Policing — removed two of their best practitioners completely from view. One becomes a House Sergeant and the other goes to the Academy — neither in a position to pass on all of their institutional knowledge or goodwill.

  2. AGovernor says:

    Exactly my concerns cassandra_m. Urging, talking, understanding without a clear, written commitment means nothing.

    You pegged it, once approved the Mayor will do what they want and Council will have no cards left to play. This plan lacks implementation schedules on a number of issues, the OT mess is dismissed as being solved by the new officers that just came out of academy, but we all know there is more to those costs than being short staffed (though I am sure that was/is the major factor).

    The commission report did not call for near $ 1 million to be implemented. Schools, and education is a part of the public safety scheme, are doing more with less, it is time for WPD to step up and toe the line fiscally and in accountability to the city they are sworn to serve.

  3. Dan says:

    Cassandra, after one of your posts, a lot of commenters were urging you to run for Mayor, but did you ever consider running for one of the at-large council seats? Your voice could really be used in that chamber. You are one of the only–if not the only–people in all of media who are directing cogent and informed criticism at both the legislature and the executive in City government. Because of the way the at-large system works (vote for up to three, top three vote-getters win seats), a candidate can leverage not just the number of his or her supporters, but the level of commitment among those supporters in that those supporters can withhold votes from all other candidates. For someone running on a good government platform (and therefore likely not trying to mobilize partisans with some kind of direct or indirect government $$), that could make a crucial difference. Additionally, it’s less of a long shot for a first time candidate and campaigning for and serving on City Council would not require you to quit your day job. I hope you give that, or a run for your district seat, consideration.

  4. AQC says:

    I like the way Dan thinks.

  5. Linda says:

    AQC: Me too!

  6. LashLarue says:

    Not that anyone cares, but over 800K in new spending for PD “command” positions while come 7/1/2015, it’ll be going on FIVE years with no PD rank and file CBA, (contract). That’s beyond disgraceful.

  7. cassandra_m says:

    Thanks for the votes of confidence everyone — hope that you also contacted your City Councilpeople to tell them to vote NO on this boondoggle. More info on this boondoggle:

    The price for promoting someone under the old pension plan is $169,000/yr. Add in a 110K salary, that is a $279K annual pricetag for an Inspector meant to be in charge of accountability and crime reduction who has no authority over operations or investigations.

    Hiring from the outside gets you the opportunity to get someone who does have some experience with crime reduction strategies. You’d still pay them $110K, but the pension burden is closer to $8K.

  8. cassandra_m says:

    To LashLarue’s point — As I understand it, contract negotiations with the WPD are in progress. No idea what kind of progress, though. Still, it isn’t smart to add more management to an organization whose management isn’t completely functional in the first place and spend money you don’t have to get there.

    ALSO, my source tells me that the city has asked the state for $1M for technology purchases. Which is pretty rich — if you rread the City’s response to the Commissions recommendations, they pointedly talk about how much the VRN has been helping them to get a bunch of stuff done that they claim to have implemented already. The consultants working for the Commission made it very clear how much in Fed grants was available for technology purchases. Do you see what we are dealing with here?

  9. LashLarue says:

    Technology? The PD can’t rid itself of carbon paper, nor keep dash cams up and running/fuctional.

  10. Anonymous says:

    So much for your $1 mil technology purchases!!!
    http://www.delawareonline.com/story/firststatepolitics/2015/06/22/state-budget-counties/29135141/
    Wait, maybe Fisker will come back;)

  11. cassandra m says:

    That was a stone cold stupid request by Bobby Marshall. Most of the money that the WPD will need for a data center (exception for any capital funds) can come from grants from the Feds who are buying this stuff like hotcakes for cities. Besides, the WPD does not have a CIO yet, so how do they know what they are asking for a million dollars for? Not do they have their “strategy” Inspector who needs to be able to weigh in and say what kind of data is needed and how it needs to be distributed and used. So the WPD and Bobby Marshall stupidly put the cart before the horse here. That said, since legislators seem to think that throwing money at the WPD will somehow improve their performance, I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if they find this money for them.