DEGOP Responds: “but, but, but…Bill Clinton got a blow job”

Filed in National by on April 13, 2015

This statement from Charles Lammot DuPont Copeland is simply pitiful.

“Hillary Clinton has been running for President for at least a decade, and today she finally made it official. Since she re-emerged into the spotlight, voters have been reminded that the word “scandal” is synonymous with “Clinton.” As the Clinton record is examined over the months to come, voters in Delaware will become very familiar with the troubling practices of Clinton, Inc. We look forward to seeing how Clinton answers for her countless ethical issues, conflict-of-interest allegations, and hypocrisies on key issues.”

It does chart out the 24/7/365 smear campaign the GOP is going to run against her though. So points for honestly, I suppose.

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (9)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Dave says:

    As an independent, I like think I reflect many of the views that most Americans share (the economic well being of Americans and yes, an exceptional America in the eyes of the world), I could care less whether someone got a BJ, or whether there were security lapses in relation to Benghazi (there were, know what they are, fix them, move on). Basically, the noise is not going to matter except to those who have already made up their minds about Clinton. The rest of us will respond to the messages of opportunity and growth. I think she set the right tone in her video. We’ll see how it plays out. I normally don’t contribute to campaigns because I can’t tolerate the spam. But I’m going to make an exception in this time.

  2. Jason330 says:

    “Basically, the noise is not going to matter except to those who have already made up their minds about Clinton. The rest of us will respond to the messages of opportunity and growth.”

    I hope you are right. This statement reveals that there will be no surprises. This will be a long dirty smear campaign. The GOP will use its wealth to try and grind down swing voters and keep them at home with “questions” and “concerns”.

    At the same time, they’ll be working to try and drain democrats of energy and enthusiasm through constant attacks. It is a narrow window, but it could work if Clinton plays into the GOP strategy by chasing the “middle” and allowing the energy and vitality of her base to dissipate.

  3. fightingbluehen says:

    “Basically, the noise is not going to matter except to those who have already made up their minds about Clinton.”

    You haven’t made up your mind about Hillary? That’s good news. I like the part about “respond to the messages”. You should respond by looking at her past actions in comparison to what she says she is about, and see if they add up.

  4. Jason330 says:

    Yeah… Look at her past actions like emailgate, the time she killed Vince Foster and Troopergate, and Benghazi, Lewinsky, travelgate… you know… the important stuff.

  5. pandora says:

    Who is this Hillary FBH speaks of that we should learn about?

    Seriously, FBH?

  6. Dorian Gray says:

    Hmm, looking at the actions of politicians vis-à-vis what they said beforehand. Does any politician stand up well to this most minimal level of scrutiny? No, they don’t. The product never lives up to the sales pitch… The people who are actually honest are dismissed out-of-hand as unelectable.

    And is there a politician that does not spin the past to fit some new idea? No, there isn’t. HRC is hardly unique in this regard.

  7. cassandra_m says:

    I’m gonna do something I never do here and that is to link to the National review — who reported on the fact that the House Intelligence Investigation on Benghazi cleared the Administration in its handling of this incident. You don’t hear much about that, of course, because keeping the noise alive is what the GOP does with the complicity of the media who apparently still can’t find its accountability function.

    Then, of course, the email issue was focused on her, even though previous Secretary of States did something similar.

    There are scandals and then there is the ginning up of more noise around the Clintons, largely because it is good for ratings. And you can count on FBH to be a part of the noise.

  8. Calvin Sparks says:

    hasn’t every man. LOL

  9. fightingbluehen says:

    “DEGOP Responds: “but, but, but…Bill Clinton got a blow job””

    Really? That’s all you have? A sexist comment?

    By definition there is no consent when a person of higher authority sexually abuses an employee.

    He was eventually disbarred for lying about his sexual escapades wasn’t he.

    It wasn’t bad enough that he abused multiple women. Hillary was then unleashed on these woman only to abuse and harass them for a second time.