“Carper, meanwhile, is a fake.”

Filed in National by on November 17, 2014

Carper’s perplexing support for the Keystone Pipeline (because it will “clear the decks” and usher in an era of bipartisan peace and prosperity) is helping people understand what a D-bag Tom Carper is. Bill McKibben writing for Salon is the latest to call our Carper for his self-satisfied and vacuous praise of the climate agreement with China, and his outright assholery for saying that the climate deal with China is so awesome that it will “outweigh” the ecological catastrophe that is the Keystone pipeline.

I don’t have any great hope that the Democrats will be able to replace Carper, but his astonishingly tone-deaf and horrible representation of Delaware in the Senate is leading me to the belief that a non-Teabag Republican would be an upgrade. A non-Teabag Republican siding with the GOP on this would only be hurting the country. Tom Carper hurts the country by supporting the equivalent of 400 new coal burning power stations. But he is also doing long term and permanent damage to the Democratic Party.

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (5)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Andy says:

    Do you expect anything else out of our delegation?

  2. Jason330 says:

    I guess I did. Now that is it is so clear that the GOP is not open to any kind of cooperation (no matter what they get), I guess I expected Carper’s boilerplate nonsense to change a little. To be honest, I don’t know why I thought that. Carper never really meant any of it. It is pure PR and window dressing, but I guess I thought he’d be a little sheepish about lying so brazenly.

  3. SussexAnon says:

    Pires is lookin’ better all the time…..

  4. donviti says:

    You mean those 10 people protesting the Keystone pipeline didnt sway Carper to vote against something that is being built 1,000 miles away from delaware?

    fix the damn link too!

  5. mouse says:

    We get nothing in return for the pipeline except the pollution and adverse public health impact. They could make a rider for increased efficiency standards or funding of renewable energy