Late Night Video — Feminist Terrorist Sleeper Cell
Great video from representatives of the Lady Parts Justice Feminist Terrorist Sleeper Cell, a terrorist group responding to the crazy petition by one more exercise in bogus male victimization that is called “A Voice for Men” at Change.org asking the White House to classify Feminism as a Terrorist Group. I never thought of myself as terrorist material, but the Lady Parts Justice Feminist Sleeper Cell seems like my kind of terrorism:
“A Voice For Men” crowdfunded $30 K for security at their so-called convention in Detroit because of feminist threats. Right? Groups of women meeting to discuss their issues have been subject to real threats and real violence since forever and these morons need SECURITY to boost their fake victimization. Good thing I’m a committed member of the sleeper cell, because there are not very nice names for this kind of cowardice.
Anyway, I’m officially a card carrying member of the Lady Parts Justice Sleeper Cell now and am tearing up my closets now looking for my stylish black beret.
Tags: Late Night Video
Great. Let’s laugh at a group of dumb ass victims.
Didn’t we do that with blacks, gays, lesbians,Jews, Catholics, and women? It was dead wrong then.
It’s okay now because you disagree with them.
So let’s see . . . shorter ATIAM: feminism is racist, anti-gay, anti-Semitic, anti-religious, and anti-women.
Laughing at dumb asses is what we do here. And these so-called “victims” are only victims of their own idiocy.
Try using your God given brain to respond rather than you dumb ass knee jerk reaction. Then maybe we could have a real conversation.
Let me know if insults are what we trade here.
Steve
Nailed it again. Said nothing useful. Do you ever get tired of being irrelevant?
Cassandra
I don’t give a rats ass about the men’s movement. I do, however, find it revealing that you find humor and/or disdain in the apparent suffering of another maligned group. Their injustice isn’t yours so, you presume, it must be shit.
This group isn’t maligned — they are just part of a group of people whose privileges are waning and who see themselves as victims of a world increasingly intolerant of their shit.
Looks from here that it is you with the jerking knee.
Oh lord. If the missing the point here isn’t intentional, I have a hug or a punch in the face for you. Which would you like?
Just want to know what groups we get to laugh at or scorn.
What is Misandrist Fixation? (google it for answer). Do female serial killers even exist? If they do they would not murder women would they? (Answers. Yes: 800; they just adore murdering women and girls). Worth looking at “A Woman’s Voice” on site The Unknown History of Misandry to find out what was left out of the government schools and by marxist dogma (“gender” — a discredited theory) pushers on mainstream media.
Just so you know — Not Pol Pot is who you get to laugh at and scorn.
Another smack down. What’s this week’s count?
No smack down — you wanted to know who to point and laugh at and I’m helping you out here.
So you weren’t smacking NPP down. You were instead doing me the favor of letting me know I could laugh at him.
In my ass-kissed world they have words for this: duplicitous shit.
Right — in which you would fit both the *duplicitous* and the *shit* labels. Your comment about figuring out who to laugh at is a clear part of this thread. And now you have manufactured this bit of outrage that you got your guidance.
Bitter, bitter person.
As pathetic as the Men’sRight’s movement might be, most folks learned long ago that it’s dead wrong to make fun and laugh at anyone simply because they are too different from you. You of all people should know better. Who are we to judge them? The same assholes that judge gays as deviants, women as chattels, the poor as lazy, the addict as shit, the beggar as lazy.
The hypocrisy of this thread and the underlying premise is unwelcomed. Family and friends aside, laugh with not at.
The Men’s Rights group isn’t being laughed at because they are different — they are being laughed at because they think we are stupid enough to buy the argument that men are somehow disadvantaged in this world. They aren’t, by stretch of the imagination. But what they are trying to do is to create their own victimhood thinking that it will give them some space to practice their BS misogyny.
If you’re buying this clown show, then that’s your problem. But they aren’t being laughed at because they are “different”.
Treating groups of people to scorn and ridicule is wrong. Ignore them if you can’t listen to their perceived wrongs.
I don’t know anything about the Men’s Right’s people. I don’t care about them. I do, however, care when others take to bashing solely because that group is deemed below you. Again, who are we to judge?
ATIAM, hopefully, this will be my last comment to you, but I am weak so who knows.
You say, “Who are we to judge?”
Are you turning over a new leaf? Because I recall quite a bit of judgement from you on the #YesAllWomen thread. Wasn’t it you who judged me by saying I raised a victim?
ATIAM: “I read your rendition of your daughter’s pain and can’t help but feel that you’ve cultivated a victim.”
ATIAM: “Point made: go back and read what you wrote. Every bit of it is saturated with the verbiage of a victim from the initial remarks, the responses and the descriptions…. Reading it all lead me to conclude that the “writing” reflected a singular focus on misogynist behavior and, no less troubling, the emotional damage creating no more than a victim.”
I could go on, but I think I made my point. I’m not seeing you having a problem in judging people. Everything you’ve written here (and on other threads) has to do with my calling you out… and everybody sees it.
Pandora:
Go back to your Can You Seem Me Yet Thread. Will respond there. Thanks.
Really?
Pandora asks you a question and now you want to dictate the venue where you’ll respond to her? Really?
🙄
LOL! I’ll just hop on over to that thread and wait for your response, okay? Maybe I could knit while I wait?
Pandora:
Responding to your post placed on another thread.
You noted: ATIAM: “I read your rendition of your daughter’s pain and can’t help but feel that you’ve cultivated a victim.”
I don’t read this as judging you. I know I didn’t mean it that way. If that’s the way it came across to you, then my apology. Bear with me though. If you read everything that I wrote in that entry, I tried to emphasize the “words” you used – that’s why I put “words” in quotations. I tried, unsuccessfully, to separate you from the words you wrote. I did not accuse or adjudge you as having created a victim. Rather, as I said then, “I felt”, based on your words/writing that you cultivated one. You could have told me that I mis-read your words. Your words, however, lead me to a conclusion. I could never presume, however, to judge you as raising a victim based solely on what you write here. Only a fool jumps so far into the dark unknown.
You noted: ATIAM: “Point made: go back and read what you wrote. Every bit of it is saturated with the verbiage of a victim from the initial remarks, the responses and the descriptions…. Reading it all lead me to conclude that the “writing” reflected a singular focus on misogynist behavior and, no less troubling, the emotional damage creating no more than a victim.”
When I wrote this passage it was in response to your question immediately prior. You asked, as best I recall, what I meant by something I said earlier. I answered it. Again, tried to separate you from your “writings.” I wasn’t trying to judge you or even be critical. I wanted insight about what you wrote. I ended that by saying that the your writings lead ME to conclude something – you were raising a victim. How could any reasonable mind, not knowing you, your daughter, your family, presume to know and adjudge you of anything based solely upon what you wrote here. If that was received as judging you personally, instead of questioning what you wrote, then I will be unintentionally offending many people going forward.
You noted: I could go on, but I think I made my point. I’m not seeing you having a problem in judging people. Everything you’re writing here (and on other threads) has to do with my calling you out… and everybody sees it.
I am certain you could offer many other instances of indignation, judgment and lack of concern for the points you made. All I can hope is that you misunderstood my bloated writing style. I tried to say, on many occasions, that I meant no harm, no bad intent. I meant it.
If you strip away the words and phrases that I used and that set you off, you’ll find, I hope, that I have more than a better than average guy understanding of misogyny in this society – don’t laugh as I realize that’s akin to being the best oceanographer at the bottom of Death Valley. I sure as shit don’t know it all – that’s why I ask questions.
I do apologize for my tone at the end. I let frustration get the better of me and took it out on you. My bad.
I. Can’t. Even. Deal. With. This. Right. Now.
Do you even see what you’ve done?
All I can ask is… is “I felt” the new “get out of jail free” card? Seems like it. So… if I said, given everything you’ve written, I feel like you raised your son to be an abuser, that would be OKAY? Of course not – that’s vile – but that’s what you did. And now it seems like you’re trying to claim you didn’t do what you did.
Come on, be honest. You spent the last few days on this blog having a fit. This wasn’t about me simply misinterpreting what you said.
You know what? Forget it. I can’t take it anymore.