Paul Ryan Has a Plan to Save the Government — You Have to Give Up Your Social Security

Filed in National by on October 9, 2013

After being completely invisible over the past few weeks, Paul Ryan re-appears in today’s WSJ to: 1) whine that the President is not negotiating with the House, 2) lie about previous debt-ceiling negotiations, 3) offer a trade of the sequester cuts for entitlement reform, 4) demand an opening of natural areas for more fossil fuel exploration, and 5) reform taxes.

Let’s get past the fact that these people haven’t been able to do much except execute a bunch of stunt votes to eliminate the ACA, we know that Ryan wants to voucherize Medicare and reduce the Social Security benefit. While spinning up his story about how Social Security was saved in 1982, all he notes is that the benefit was cut in order to extend the life of the program. That’s quite wrong, though — there was a combination of a benefit cut AND increased taxes to extend the life of the program. And even though President Obama keeps proposing chained CPI as a way to extend the life of Social Security, there is simply no one in the House who can say Yes to this proposal. They are waiting for all of their proposals to be agreed to, and aren’t interested even in incremental change.

But re-orienting their Ask to their usual list of GOP wants, they continue to muddy the water over this shutdown AND the looming debt limit crisis. At first it was defunding Obamacare, then it just devolved into a long and distasteful litany of attempts to save face. Note that he doesn’t call for a vote on a clean CR and nor does he remind his readers that the House has been refusing to negotiate with Democrats over the budget for 6 months or that the GOP plotted to take the government hostage back in the winter.

All of the stuff he lists as possible ways out are things that are already under consideration in the regular budget order. What Ryan thinks can happen is that they can gain ground towards their wish list by holding their hostages, rather than sitting down and getting back to the regular order. What I suspect Ryan and the GOP know now is that giving up their hostage means they have to not only work for a living now, but that they’ll need to settle for considerably less than their wish list.

And All Hands Off of Social Security. Congress needs to pay back the Trust Fund and they need to raise taxes so that the system can pay adequate benefits as it was designed to.

Tags: ,

About the Author ()

"You don't make progress by standing on the sidelines, whimpering and complaining. You make progress by implementing ideas." -Shirley Chisholm

Comments (7)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Jason330 says:

    Man oh man. How did the world get so upside down that a guy who got his ass totally handed to him in the last election thinks he can dictate terms to the winners?

  2. liberalgeek says:

    If Harry Reid breaks the back of the Republican party (and I think he is going to), does he get to be Hillary’s running mate?

  3. Jason330 says:

    Oh lordy! I wish I had your confidence.

    Also – yes. By acclamation

  4. pandora says:

    And… the conservatives/tea party have labeled Ryan a traitor. His op-ed didn’t mention “Obamacare!” Gasp!

    Please, please, please, don’t let this lead to the pundits claiming Ryan’s ideas are “middle ground” and a “compromise”

  5. puck says:

    Whenever you hear soneone call for “entitlement reform,” whether it be Paul Ryan or Tom Carper, stop them and call for “entitlement funding reform” and see their enthusiasm drop.

    Rand Paul is going around advocating we avoid default by paying debt service out of current revenue (without naming what doesn’t get paid). Otherwise known as “Pay China First.”

  6. bamboozer says:

    The house is a mad house at this point, if the Republicans are not defeated this is just the beginning, as noted they’ll be back to try and destroy Medicare and Social Security next. As for “negotiations” they have no intention of anything but Soviet style negotiations that consist of “what’s mine is mine, what’s yours is negotiable”.

  7. cassandra_m says:

    Rand Paul is going around advocating we avoid default by paying debt service out of current revenue (without naming what doesn’t get paid).

    I may have said this already, so forgive the repeat — but the thing that gets ignored here is that a default puts the US dollar at risk of being the safest currency on earth. The Chinese have dollar-denomiated assets because this the US is still the safest place to park your money. The US might be able to pay debt service for a little while, but they can’t withstand a withdrawal of funds — a withdrawal that nervous countries and institutions will do in some part. It won’t be all or most, but when T-bills mature, they might cash in rather than roll them over.

    And don’t forget that Social Security is the biggest holder US debt, followed (I think) by the US Treasury for the QE program. States and pension funds hold US debt. So there are folks out there who are telling Americans that they won’t feel the effects of a debt crisis immediately (which is definitely a lie for people with retirement account money in the markets), November 1 is the date Americans get hit. That is the date no Social Security checks get posted.