Teabags proven right about Romney’s suckage – already crowing over Mitt’s loss

Filed in National by on September 26, 2012

They predicted it. They told the party elites that Romney was not the guy. They said that Obamacare could sink the President, but couldn’t be used by the man from Massachusetts. The eventual Romney loss was so clear to the teabags. So obvious. But did the GOP elites and shot callers listen…? Hell no. They went and forced this talking haircut on them, and now they are pissed. Pissed and vindicated. So vindicated, apparently, that they are not even waiting until election night to start talking about how vindicated they are.

After Foisting Romney on Base, GOP Elites Now Start to Gripe

One of the most interesting aspects of the 2012 election is how the tea party movement has proven more politically mature than the center-right’s self-styled elites, and those who spent much of the Republican primary season chiding swathes of people for being insufficiently pragmatic have turned out to be far more childish than the conservative base.

For the past several weeks, Mitt Romney has been surrounded by critics from the DC-Manhattan elite who’ve denounced him for a lackluster, unfocused campaign, teeing off on Team Romney in the wake of the 47 percent comments for a number of issues—but mostly, in my read, from failing to take their advice. Romney’s defenders, meanwhile, have been many of the same individuals who spent the primary season torching him in effigy as the encapsulation of everything they hate about the Republican ruling class. For months the elites bashed the base for failing to suck it up and see the big picture, to line up for Romney and come on in for the big win. But they got their wish!

About the Author ()

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

Comments (3)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. pandora says:

    Truth is… not one of the GOP primary candidates stood a chance at winning. Romney is an absolute disaster mainly because he ran so far right in the primary and had to stay right in the general or lose the base/tea partiers.

    If Romney had been able to win the primary without going full wingnut and then had pivoted to the middle in the general he’d have stood a good chance at winning. (And I get anything can happen between now and the election.)

    The problem really isn’t Romney. The problem is the Republican ideology. The tragedy in this is that if Romney loses it only means 4 more years of the “not conservative enough” excuse.

    See, the tea party ignores things like their darling, Paul Ryan, getting booed at the AARP meeting. But they do so at their own risk.

  2. jason330 says:

    I know. (Assuming a Romney loss)the GOP will not confront the real reasons for the loss, but will continue to chalk it up to “not conservative enough.” That’s bad for the GOP but could be worse for the country if the 2nd major political party remains in the hands of maniacs, idiots, and idiot maniacs.

  3. While door knocking in the 23rd RD this past weekend, I spoke with a Republican-registered voter who is voting all D this year, in protest for how the Republican party has permitted itself to be taken over by the tea-baggers.

    I did not complain.