“Anarchy was occurring before our very eyes.”

Filed in National by on April 29, 2012

A history of the LA riots written in 1993..

The story of how the worst American riot in this century began is a little like the story of Rodney King’s beating: By now it has been twisted into a series of half-truths and misconceptions. Just as King was not simply a speeding motorist who was beaten after a routine traffic stop, so, too, the analyses of the roots of the Los Angeles riot require some revision. The official version runs roughly as follows: Angry blacks, indignant over a suburban jury’s decision on April 29, 1992, to acquit four LAPD cops in the King beating, started the riot by pulling white trucker Reginald Denny from the cab of his truck and then beating him brutally to avenge the King beating. The subsequent riot was bred out of decades of racism and police brutality and nourished by the enraging conditions of ghetto life: unemployment, poverty, family breakdown, gangs, drugs, welfare and Reagan-era cutbacks in aid. When it was over, more than 50 people lay dead, 2,300 had been injured and $1 billion in property had been damaged.

No one doubts that deprivation and bitterness fill many neighborhoods in South Central Los Angeles or that outrage at the cops’ acquittal set the stage for the riot. But there are two core premises to the official version of the riot that are wrong in some instances and exaggerated in others. The first is that the grim conditions of South Central and the surprise acquittals combined to make a riot inevitable. The second is that the Los Angeles riot was fundamentally a massive protest over social injustice. Many liberal commentators, as well as prominent black and Latino Angelenos, now insist that the riot should be referred to as a “rebellion” or an “uprising.” The men accused of beating, trampling and robbing Reginald Denny have thus been dubbed the “L.A. Four”–a moniker usually reserved for political martyrs.

The true story of the riot is more disquieting. Contrary to conventional wisdom, it began in one of South Central’s better-off neighborhoods. Avenging Rodney King was only superficially present in the minds of those who started the riot at the now infamous intersection of Florence and Normandie avenues. And the young men who nearly killed Reginald Denny were distinguished neither by their notoriety as thugs (as some conservatives would have it) nor by their militancy (as some liberals suggest).

Tags: ,

About the Author ()

A Dad, a husband and a data guru

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. cassandra_m says:

    I remember this article and it was controversial when it was first published. The author wants to inventory the bad acts of King and a number of the initial rioters and make those bad acts negate the violent uprising of an entire community. There have been some who think that the killing of the African American high schooler at the hands of a Korean shopowner is also one of the reasons for the riots and this incident is nowhere to be found in this article.

    The circumstances of King’s arrest were a big part of the trial and I don’t think it is credible that no one would know that he was not being cooperative with the police. But there *were* alot of black and brown people in LA who could watch that video tape of King’s beating and know firsthand how cavalierly LA cops and prosecutors treated that community. And it didn’t matter if you were a South Central gangbanger or Baldwin Hills doctor, the LA police were a menace to you. LAPD behavior doesn’t excuse rioter behavior, either.

    I’ve been reading alot about the riots this weekend and 20 years later there still isn’t a definitive story about this event. Wonder why?

    I’ve largely seen the riots after the King verdict and the jubilation in parts of LA over the OJ verdict as two sides of the same thing. Outrage over the LAPD getting away with it again and cheers that the LAPD (and the prosecutors) were not allowed to get away with the usual easy appeals to race. I thought then (and still do) that OJ was guilty, but that the system wasn’t prepared for a defense team or a judge who would let them get away with the usual misbehavior.

  2. cassandra_m says:

    Then again, there is this handy Chris Rock PSA on How to Not Get Your Ass Kicked By the Police.