Let it Die

Filed in National by on October 7, 2011

Last week, Senator Coons spoke to the Progressives Democrats for Delaware, and some of what he had to say was agreeable, some disagreeable, and some both at the same time. For example, he stated that at the beginning of the new Congress, the Senate had the opportunity to vote on the rules for the session, a vote that cannot be filibustered at all and can pass with a simple majority. Senator Coons, to his credit, was one of the Democratic Senators that joined Senator Tom Udall to reform the filibuster. Indeed, many of either the newly elected or more progressive Democratic Senators wanted to end the practice of filibuster and secret holds completely, for they had a silly notion that the Senate should be ruled by the majority and not the minority.

But Senator Coons and others signed onto Senator Udall’s plan as a compromise between the status quo and ending the practice altogether, and the reform centered on shifting the burden of the filibuster away from the majority in trying to pass something and unto the minority to sustain a filibuster. The Udall proposal would require that if a cloture vote fails (i.e. does not get 60 votes), then the Senate must keep with the subject at hand until cloture is reached, instead of switching to other business. If no Senator keeps the debate going, cloture will be assumed. The proposal would have also eliminated secret holds.

This proposal would have brought Mr. Smith Goes to Washington to life in some ways.

But alas, Coons said other Democrats said we will be back in the minority at some point in the future, maybe even as soon as 2013, and the filibuster and secret holds are a tool we want to use against President Perry, Speaker Cantor and Majority Leader Corynn as they repeal Obamacare, end Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the Departments of Labor, Energy, Education, Health and Human Services, and the EPA.
And so filibuster reform failed and life moved on as usual in the Senate, or in other words, horribly dysfunctional and undemocratic.

Last night, Harry Reid did something to upset that apple cart, and I say it is a good thing, and Democratic cowards like Carper will say it is a bad thing. Before we get into what Harry Reid did, let’s talk about what he did not do. He did not invoke the Nuclear Option, as some media portrayed it. Listen to Steve Benen and Dave Waldman on what actually happened.

But let me distill it down for you. Republicans were acting like jackasses in obstructing the passage of the currency bill so that they can play games with the Jobs bill. Cloture passed, which means 60 Senators voted to move forward with the currency bill, which means no unrelated amendments could be considered. Republicans still wanted to add the unrelated Jobs bill as an Amendment to Currency bill so they could get Democrats to vote against it so that they could say that the opposition to the Jobs bills was bipartisan. So Reid asked the Parliamentarian for a Point of Order declaring the Jobs Bill as an unrelated Amendment, and so some inexplicable reason the Parliamentarian said it was related. So Reid said Fuck you Parliamentarian and the Dems voted by a simple majority to overturn the Parliamentarian’s ruling.

McConnell, described as “visibly angry and shaken,” fumed to his colleagues, “We are fundamentally turning the Senate into the House. The minority’s out of business.” A GOP staffer added, “Just wait until they get into the minority!”

GOOD! The minority should be put of business, especially when the minority does everything possible to obstruct and prevent actual governance. Especially when the minority is actually doing everything it can to make America fail. The minority should be put out of business.

This maneuver was a loooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnggggggggggg time coming. The Republicans in the Senate and the House are legislative terrorists and they have been for some time. It has been long past time to punch them back in the face in response. So bravo to Reid.

The bedwetters among the Democrats and the beltway media will now start saying that this will come back to haunt the Dems in 2013 should the GOP gain a majority in the Senate. Guess what? What the Dems lacked the guts to do in 2009 and 2011 the GOP will definitely do in 2013 should they win: end the filibuster and secret holds. I guarantee you they will do that. Especially if the President is a Republican. If Obama is reelected, they may keep the holds in place so they can continue to obstruct him.

And I repeat… GOOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let there be no impediment to enacting what party’s agenda should it win the majority. For that way, the party’s agenda is clear to the people, whether it is the Republican Party we are talking about or the Democratic Party. And the people can judge that party better for what it does, rather than trying to decipher who is at for fault for something not getting passed.

So yes, if Obama looses next year, and the GOP gains the trifecta of the Presidency and both houses of Congress, I don’t want the filibuster and secret holds to prevent them from enacting their evil plans. I want their evil plans to be enacted. I want the voters who vote for them or not at all to suffer the consequences of that decision, and the consequences will be a stacked GOP Supreme Court, Federal Judiciary and the ending once and for all of the New Deal and Great Society programs.

Then maybe, with the filibuster gone, people will see more clearly.

About the Author ()

Comments (6)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. puck says:

    “the filibuster and secret holds are a tool we want to use against President Perry”

    Bullshit. Democrats are incapable of finding 60 votes against a Republican position. The filibuster is useless to Democrats so let it die.

    The filibuster always helps Republicans, always hurts Democrats and never helps them. When have Democrats EVER used a filibuster to their advantage?

  2. Delaware Dem says:

    Actually Puck, I agree with you, but you are wrong in the math. All the Democrats would have to do is garner 40 votes against a Republican bill. The Republicans would have to find 60 votes to pass it.

    And you have a very selective memory. The Dems have used the filibuster to their advantage, just not as well as the GOP. We blocked Bush’s Social Security Privatization in 2005 by filibustering it, for example.

  3. puck says:

    Doh! of course. My, the air is thin up here.

  4. Dana Garrett says:

    “Guess what? What the Dems lacked the guts to do in 2009 and 2011 the GOP will definitely do in 2013 should they win: end the filibuster and secret holds. I guarantee you they will do that.” Bingo. You took the words right out of my mouth.

  5. Truth Teller says:

    The Problem today is there are no Dem’s FDR was a dem Truman Was a Dem JFK and LBJ were Dem’s. 85% of the people wanted a public option or Universal Health care Obama had 60 votes in the senate and nothing happened.So as long as we have this two party system don’t hold your breath for change.

    And on a further note the Repuk house just passed a law that makes it a crime for a citizen to buy sell or use dope in any country in the world. If you are having a wedding in Amsterdam and you decide to furnish pot to the party which is legal in Holland you are subject to arrest here in this country. Lamar Smith of Texas introduced the bill with a DEM co sponsor.

    Do you tink it will pass the senate and if so what will Obama do?????

  6. Free Market Democrat says:

    Liberal Democracy only has two requirements: the rule of the majority and the respect of minority rights. Filibusters (but not secret holds, they just suck) are an important part of maintaning that respect for minority rights. However, Sen. Coons and Udall are correct, we need to reform the filibuster rules to make them less obstructionist. To eliminate the filibuster entirely would end programs that are important to us.

    While it might make us feel better to say “Go ahead and cut them so that everyone realizes how much of a mistake they made”, but we have to remember that letting those programs get eliminated will hurt people, real people. These aren’t just statistics that we can manipulate to get what we want. We have a responsibility to fight for the people who depend on us to simply survive. We shouldn’t play games with their lives for our own political advantage.