Wednesday Open Thread

Filed in National by on June 30, 2010

Welcome to your Wednesday open thread. We finally got a break in the weather, just in time for our holiday weekend.

Will Rand Paul piss off all constituencies? He had a bit of trouble when talking to a home-schooling group.

Republican senatorial candidate Rand Paul told a group of Christian home schoolers in Kentucky on Friday that he favors a separation of church and state, saying allowing the government into religious institutions “scares” him.

The tea party favorite also voiced his opposition to government faith-based initiatives that have been used to funnel federal and state funds into religious organizations.

Paul, a Presbyterian layman, campaigned at a Christian Home Educators of Kentucky convention where he was peppered with questions about his religious beliefs, brushing aside one about the age of the earth that he later described as ridiculous.

“I’m not running for minister,” Paul said later. “I’m more than willing to stand up and say I’m a Christian, but I don’t think I have to go into every detail of what my religious beliefs are. If I were going to be the minister of their church, they’d have a right to ask me that.”

So is Paul saying he’s not sure or does he just not want to admit that he’s not a Young Earth Creationist?

nemski already blogged about the Boehner interview to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, but the interview was full of nuttiness. Greg Sargent points out another part of the interview, where Boehner dismisses the financial regulation bill as overkill.

Dems and bloggers are jumping on this interview that John Boehner gave to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, in which he appeared to deride financial reform as “killing an ant with a nuclear weapon.”

That line is the only direct Boehner quote about FinReg in the interview — the rest was parahprased — so I was at first skeptical. But the Tribune reporter on the story sends over Boehner’s full quote, and it is indeed about FinReg. Boehner:

“This is killing an ant with a nuclear weapon. There are faults in our regulatory system, some in terms of transparency, most as a result of ineffective enforcement by the bureaucracy who have no idea what these financial products look like today. That could’ve been fixed, but that’s not what we have here.

“This bill institutionalizes too big to fail, puts the government on the hook and gives them the ability to bail out anyone, and allows these unelected bureaucrats to make decisions on behalf of the government in terms of who they’re going to bail out, who they’re going to take over, who they’re going to control, whether they’re a financial firm or not….

“I just hope this bill is out there for several weeks so that the American people can see it and the American people can understand it.”

In the same interview, Boehner also said we should raise the age for Social Security benefits to 70 (but only for people 20 years away from retirement). Thanks John!

Tags:

About the Author ()

Opinionated chemist, troublemaker, blogger on national and Delaware politics.

Comments (8)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. nemski says:

    Larry King is leaving his show in the fall. CNN is looking for a three-pack a day retired grandmother to take his place.

  2. jason330 says:

    When I got a CNN news alert on my phone that started “Larry King….” I was sure he was dead.

  3. anon says:

    Boehner also suggested a means test on Social Security. Dems should take him up on that. It’s bipartisan now!

  4. xstryker says:

    Fundies freak out, vandalize a billboard saying “One Nation, Indivisible” – just like Congress in 1954 (at the height of the Cold War), they wanted to amend the original pledge (written by a Baptist minister in 1892 with no “Under God” whatsoever) to enforce verbal monotheism on every American. Here’s my advice – if you believe in (some form of) God but support the rights of atheists, next time you say the pledge, instead of “Under God” say “Under Jesus” or “Under Hashem” or “Under an Unknown Creator” and see how people react. If “Under Jesus” doesn’t raise a reaction, get bolder and say “Under the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit” or “Under Jesus Christ and the Virgin Mary” or some other more detailed version. Bonus points to Catholics who starting naming multiple saints. I’d love to see the fundies try to tell you that you have to say “God” instead of “Lord Jesus Christ Emmanuel, God’s Only Begotten Son, Blessed Be His Name”. The ensuing verbal cacophany also clearly illustrates why we can’t be “Indivisible” if they keep trying to divide us by religion.

  5. RSmitty says:

    …Here’s my advice – if you believe in (some form of) God but support the rights of atheists, next time you say the pledge, instead of “Under God” say…
    X – how about “One Nation, Under the Constitution,” since the concept of God governing a country really isn’t inline with most interpretations of western religions when it comes to these “earthly” governments.

  6. The war between Markos, 538 and Research 2000 is heating up. R2K is threatening criminal action against Markos and is sending Cease & Desist letters everywhere. Dkos and 538 don’t seem intimidated.

    To me, it looks like desperation on the part of R2K. The 538 analysis and the dkos report are worth reading if you’re interested in statistics. It seems persuasive to me.

  7. anon says:

    I like how the Democrats are having to change state law to get a candidate who’ll run against Vance Phillips. No, we’re not playing politics here, nothing to see …

    http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=20106300350