Modified Reconciliation Fix Passes

Filed in National by on March 25, 2010

The modified reconciliation fix has passed the House for the second time, 220-207. This means that the agreed-upon fixes agreed to by both the House and the Senate are now done.

I hope that Democrats have learned a lesson from this – if they stay together as a caucus and anticipate Republican tactics, they can prevail. Despite all the threats made by the Republicans, in the end the passage was anti-climactic.

This doesn’t mean that the fight is over. I think it’s just beginning. The bill does not spell out the enforcement mechanism, which will be written by the HHS. We’ll have to keep our eyes out to make sure that the regulations are written to favor consumers over insurers. There’s still the public option and Medicare buy-in.

What have we learned from this? In my case I’ve learned that real change is difficult, incredibly difficult and exhausting. You can’t give up and you can’t count on people to do the right thing without prodding. The most frustrating thing for me is practically having to beg our elected officials to do the right thing. Hopefully our elected officials have learned that nothing feels better than winning and will continue the streak.

There’s a huge downside, which is the behavior of the Republicans, especially the leadership. They settled on a strategy of failure for America and they’re sticking to it. They are happy to stir the fear and hatred of unhinged followers, as long as it benefits them. I’m hoping that this strategy bites them in the rear but it won’t as long as the media plays the false equivalence game.

Tags:

About the Author ()

Opinionated chemist, troublemaker, blogger on national and Delaware politics.

Comments (2)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Actually what they should learn is that it is stupid to divide your own side and unite the opposition. Skillful politics tends to divide their side and unite your own side.

  2. Scott P says:

    Skillful (and successful) politicians also form coalitions of like-minded individuals and groups. They welcome the help of those who agree with them in priciple, even if not in precise detail. They don’t kick to the curb everyone who refuses to go along with everything they say or else. The second method leads to a very cohesive, unified, but small and ineffective force.