<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats Introduce Bill To Repeal Health Insurance Anti-Trust Exemption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2010/02/04/democrats-introduce-bill-to-repeal-health-insurance-anti-trust-exemption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2010/02/04/democrats-introduce-bill-to-repeal-health-insurance-anti-trust-exemption/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: journey home</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2010/02/04/democrats-introduce-bill-to-repeal-health-insurance-anti-trust-exemption/#comment-172802</link>
		<dc:creator>journey home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=34310#comment-172802</guid>
		<description>“Use Senate reconciliation and expand Medicare via the Senate’s buy-in provisions. The CBO has already signed off on this as a means of saving money. 

More importantly, if more Americans can do a buy-in with Medicare, it creates more cost control (because there’s a genuine “public option” competitor). 

It also helps to solve the problems of pre-existing conditions, because Medicare does not deny coverage on this basis.

Allowing a Medicare buy-in to Americans under 65 would give people a genuine alternative to private insurance and thereby render the pre-existing question moot. 

It would also lower Medicare costs by expanding the risk pool of patients (the great bulk of medical expenses are accounted for by a small number of people, mostly the elderly, requiring very expensive treatment). 

And it would substantially enhance the global competitiveness of American corporations. After all, in what other country in the world is health care a marginal cost of production for business?” - Roosevelt Institute Marshall Auerback</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Use Senate reconciliation and expand Medicare via the Senate’s buy-in provisions. The CBO has already signed off on this as a means of saving money. </p>
<p>More importantly, if more Americans can do a buy-in with Medicare, it creates more cost control (because there’s a genuine “public option” competitor). </p>
<p>It also helps to solve the problems of pre-existing conditions, because Medicare does not deny coverage on this basis.</p>
<p>Allowing a Medicare buy-in to Americans under 65 would give people a genuine alternative to private insurance and thereby render the pre-existing question moot. </p>
<p>It would also lower Medicare costs by expanding the risk pool of patients (the great bulk of medical expenses are accounted for by a small number of people, mostly the elderly, requiring very expensive treatment). </p>
<p>And it would substantially enhance the global competitiveness of American corporations. After all, in what other country in the world is health care a marginal cost of production for business?” &#8211; Roosevelt Institute Marshall Auerback</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Munson</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2010/02/04/democrats-introduce-bill-to-repeal-health-insurance-anti-trust-exemption/#comment-172644</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Munson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=34310#comment-172644</guid>
		<description>This was introduced last year, Insurance Industry Competition Act of 2009. I can&#039;t tell what happened to it, but it looks like it got lost in committee. So good luck on it this time around. 

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1583/show</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was introduced last year, Insurance Industry Competition Act of 2009. I can&#8217;t tell what happened to it, but it looks like it got lost in committee. So good luck on it this time around. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1583/show" rel="nofollow">http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h1583/show</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2010/02/04/democrats-introduce-bill-to-repeal-health-insurance-anti-trust-exemption/#comment-172632</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=34310#comment-172632</guid>
		<description>Markey is the Democratic hero who knocked off Marilyn Manson, I mean Musgrave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markey is the Democratic hero who knocked off Marilyn Manson, I mean Musgrave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2010/02/04/democrats-introduce-bill-to-repeal-health-insurance-anti-trust-exemption/#comment-172631</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=34310#comment-172631</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see the Senate version...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see the Senate version&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delaware Dem</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2010/02/04/democrats-introduce-bill-to-repeal-health-insurance-anti-trust-exemption/#comment-172629</link>
		<dc:creator>Delaware Dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=34310#comment-172629</guid>
		<description>Introducing legislation is nice, but I want to see passage of legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Introducing legislation is nice, but I want to see passage of legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

