<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is Why We Need The Public Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:56:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163385</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 23:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163385</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hospitals are throwing patients out before they are ready to make a profit for the insurance companies. &quot;

What does this mean?

&quot;Hospitals and insurance companies work hand in hand&quot;.

Only where they have the same ownership (please see my previous posts).  Otherwise, it&#039;s not in the hospitals&#039; interests to do that; the two parties negotiate every 2-3 years over every inpatient day, every procedure, every ancillary, etc.  That&#039;s hardly hand-in-hand, unless by that you mean &quot;combat.&quot;  But, when the patient runs out of insurance money, the hospital will look to dump elsewhere him as quickly as legally possible.  Because not for profit doesn&#039;t mean &quot;we don&#039;t want to charge you.&quot;

&quot;How many millions does Christiana Care have in the bank profit wise?&quot;

I don&#039;t know; I don&#039;t live in Delaware.  And everything in the bank isn&#039;t &quot;profit.&quot;  Take an accounting lesson:  what&#039;s in the bank must include IBNR, the required state reserve, funds for capital improvement (unless you don&#039;t want real technology in your hospital next year), etc.

&quot;Yet they push folk out the door constantly who have medicare and other insurance and force employees to do double work.&quot;

Ah, now we get to your real point:  you&#039;ve had a personal experience that you&#039;re pissed about.  Point taken.  Everyone has.  But that doesn&#039;t have anything to do with my discussion.  

Do you have data to prove &quot;double work.&quot;  or &quot;push folk out the door constantly&quot;?  Constantly is pretty damned hard to prove, friend.

Just because there&#039;s no not for profit insurer in your area, doesn&#039;t mean there aren&#039;t any. The major carrier in my area (75% of the market) is not for profit.  Go over the border to Pa and you&#039;ll find several NFPs.  As Cassandra said, teh Google is your friend.

And every hospital in NY state is not for profit.  And not one of them is owned by an insurance carrier.

So what&#039;s your problem, specifically with my &quot;facts?&quot;  I got that you don&#039;t like Carper -- he isn&#039;t particularly beloved around these boards, either -- but what the hell&#039;s your problem with me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hospitals are throwing patients out before they are ready to make a profit for the insurance companies. &#8221;</p>
<p>What does this mean?</p>
<p>&#8220;Hospitals and insurance companies work hand in hand&#8221;.</p>
<p>Only where they have the same ownership (please see my previous posts).  Otherwise, it&#8217;s not in the hospitals&#8217; interests to do that; the two parties negotiate every 2-3 years over every inpatient day, every procedure, every ancillary, etc.  That&#8217;s hardly hand-in-hand, unless by that you mean &#8220;combat.&#8221;  But, when the patient runs out of insurance money, the hospital will look to dump elsewhere him as quickly as legally possible.  Because not for profit doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;we don&#8217;t want to charge you.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;How many millions does Christiana Care have in the bank profit wise?&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know; I don&#8217;t live in Delaware.  And everything in the bank isn&#8217;t &#8220;profit.&#8221;  Take an accounting lesson:  what&#8217;s in the bank must include IBNR, the required state reserve, funds for capital improvement (unless you don&#8217;t want real technology in your hospital next year), etc.</p>
<p>&#8220;Yet they push folk out the door constantly who have medicare and other insurance and force employees to do double work.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, now we get to your real point:  you&#8217;ve had a personal experience that you&#8217;re pissed about.  Point taken.  Everyone has.  But that doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with my discussion.  </p>
<p>Do you have data to prove &#8220;double work.&#8221;  or &#8220;push folk out the door constantly&#8221;?  Constantly is pretty damned hard to prove, friend.</p>
<p>Just because there&#8217;s no not for profit insurer in your area, doesn&#8217;t mean there aren&#8217;t any. The major carrier in my area (75% of the market) is not for profit.  Go over the border to Pa and you&#8217;ll find several NFPs.  As Cassandra said, teh Google is your friend.</p>
<p>And every hospital in NY state is not for profit.  And not one of them is owned by an insurance carrier.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s your problem, specifically with my &#8220;facts?&#8221;  I got that you don&#8217;t like Carper &#8212; he isn&#8217;t particularly beloved around these boards, either &#8212; but what the hell&#8217;s your problem with me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163382</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163382</guid>
		<description>Like what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cassandra m</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163380</link>
		<dc:creator>cassandra m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163380</guid>
		<description>Hey JK -- the fact free is usually you.  Take a few breaths to actually read what people say before raging away.  The google is your friend -- finding a few remaining BCBS is not too far from your fingertips.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JK &#8212; the fact free is usually you.  Take a few breaths to actually read what people say before raging away.  The google is your friend &#8212; finding a few remaining BCBS is not too far from your fingertips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just kiddin</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163371</link>
		<dc:creator>just kiddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163371</guid>
		<description>Hey Progressive Mom. You totally lack in facts. Can you prove anything you are saying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Progressive Mom. You totally lack in facts. Can you prove anything you are saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just kiddin</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163370</link>
		<dc:creator>just kiddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163370</guid>
		<description>Progressives around the country are well aware today who the fly in the public option ointment is, Senator Tom Carper. Carper made a complete ass of himself slurring his words with Chris Matthews. Since the State Democratic Party is permitting this shill for corporations to continue to destroy any chance of a real public option, without calling the fink out it just goes to show how powerful the little state of Delaware is nationally.

Blue Cross Blue Shield started out non profit, but soon found out how much they could steal by going for profit. Hospitals are throwing patients out before they are ready to make a profit for the insurance companies. Hospitals and insurance companies work hand in hand. How many millions does Christiana Care have in the bank profit wise? Yet they push folk out the door constantly who have medicare and other insurance and force employees to do double work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Progressives around the country are well aware today who the fly in the public option ointment is, Senator Tom Carper. Carper made a complete ass of himself slurring his words with Chris Matthews. Since the State Democratic Party is permitting this shill for corporations to continue to destroy any chance of a real public option, without calling the fink out it just goes to show how powerful the little state of Delaware is nationally.</p>
<p>Blue Cross Blue Shield started out non profit, but soon found out how much they could steal by going for profit. Hospitals are throwing patients out before they are ready to make a profit for the insurance companies. Hospitals and insurance companies work hand in hand. How many millions does Christiana Care have in the bank profit wise? Yet they push folk out the door constantly who have medicare and other insurance and force employees to do double work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163336</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163336</guid>
		<description>It is naive for anyone to think the non-profit health insurance companies is a crown for the health care industry.  At best it&#039;s a misnomer for those companies who still make a ton of money, pay incredible salaries, but fall under a different, more veiled IRS category.  Beware.

Kaiser is an old whore (and yes I am using that word). I have navigated organ transplant surgery thru that system, and was HORRIFIED at the bureacratic web one has to detangle, and the warehousing of CRITICAL patients they keep warehoused in local hospitals awaiting to be &quot;called up&quot;.  I have NEVER seen that back East here--our critical patients are kept in house at our larger university hospital etc., and continually monitored and managed preparing for a hopeful transplant.  My sense was KP just kept them hospitalized in a KP facility, no interventions etc., in hopes of...I&#039;m not going to say.  I literally had to dictate orders on a 35 yo pt. awaiting a liver/kidney transplant to a hepatologist--whose current orders read like the person was in a nursing home w/ routine needs.  My on-site visit to this local hospital was the kick in the #@* for transfer to UCSF...and the story goes on from there.

The only non-profit I know w/ any heart in the matter, who manages financially well, and gives excellent distribution of care, up to and including, sending out a patient from their system when needed is Intermountain Health Care (IHC).

I hope Mayo does well and wish them well--Scripps too--but the thing w/ lending your name to these &quot;ventures&quot; in healthcare, really can diminish one&#039;s credibility ( Penn&#039;s gone through it, and Hopkins has scrambled too)  These hospitals really need to re-evaluate the whole insurance alignment thing, because it is coming back to bite &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is naive for anyone to think the non-profit health insurance companies is a crown for the health care industry.  At best it&#8217;s a misnomer for those companies who still make a ton of money, pay incredible salaries, but fall under a different, more veiled IRS category.  Beware.</p>
<p>Kaiser is an old whore (and yes I am using that word). I have navigated organ transplant surgery thru that system, and was HORRIFIED at the bureacratic web one has to detangle, and the warehousing of CRITICAL patients they keep warehoused in local hospitals awaiting to be &#8220;called up&#8221;.  I have NEVER seen that back East here&#8211;our critical patients are kept in house at our larger university hospital etc., and continually monitored and managed preparing for a hopeful transplant.  My sense was KP just kept them hospitalized in a KP facility, no interventions etc., in hopes of&#8230;I&#8217;m not going to say.  I literally had to dictate orders on a 35 yo pt. awaiting a liver/kidney transplant to a hepatologist&#8211;whose current orders read like the person was in a nursing home w/ routine needs.  My on-site visit to this local hospital was the kick in the #@* for transfer to UCSF&#8230;and the story goes on from there.</p>
<p>The only non-profit I know w/ any heart in the matter, who manages financially well, and gives excellent distribution of care, up to and including, sending out a patient from their system when needed is Intermountain Health Care (IHC).</p>
<p>I hope Mayo does well and wish them well&#8211;Scripps too&#8211;but the thing w/ lending your name to these &#8220;ventures&#8221; in healthcare, really can diminish one&#8217;s credibility ( Penn&#8217;s gone through it, and Hopkins has scrambled too)  These hospitals really need to re-evaluate the whole insurance alignment thing, because it is coming back to bite &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163325</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163325</guid>
		<description>JK -- There are many not for profit health insurance companies in this country, including many Blue Cross Plans,  a good handful of regional HMOs left over from HMO Glory Days in the 1980&#039;s, and the granddaddy of HMO, Kaiser Permanente, still a major player on the Left Coast.  Until very recently, not for profit plans were the dominant providers of health coverage in the nation -- not counting the public plans (and that&#039;s what your examples are:  public plans. They are largely/exclusively funded with taxpayer dollars and not premiums from the people they support.   A single-payer system is not funded the same way, although government dollars are involved.)

As for DL and Carper -- come by more often and continue reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JK &#8212; There are many not for profit health insurance companies in this country, including many Blue Cross Plans,  a good handful of regional HMOs left over from HMO Glory Days in the 1980&#8217;s, and the granddaddy of HMO, Kaiser Permanente, still a major player on the Left Coast.  Until very recently, not for profit plans were the dominant providers of health coverage in the nation &#8212; not counting the public plans (and that&#8217;s what your examples are:  public plans. They are largely/exclusively funded with taxpayer dollars and not premiums from the people they support.   A single-payer system is not funded the same way, although government dollars are involved.)</p>
<p>As for DL and Carper &#8212; come by more often and continue reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163323</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163323</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.delawareliberal.net/tag/tom-carper/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DL posts on Tom Carper&lt;/a&gt;, for those who come to accuse without doing any research first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the link to <a href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/tag/tom-carper/" rel="nofollow">DL posts on Tom Carper</a>, for those who come to accuse without doing any research first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cassandra_m</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163320</link>
		<dc:creator>cassandra_m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163320</guid>
		<description>Kaiser Permenente is a non-profit, as is Mayo and Geisinger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaiser Permenente is a non-profit, as is Mayo and Geisinger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geezer</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163317</link>
		<dc:creator>Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163317</guid>
		<description>Blue Cross/Blue Shield is still non-profit in some states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue Cross/Blue Shield is still non-profit in some states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. price</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163316</link>
		<dc:creator>A. price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163316</guid>
		<description>jk,  you are preaching to the choir.  Also, you obviously didn&#039;t follow UI,s link to where at least these liberals have called tom carpet out.   Have you called his office?  have you tried to write to the news urinal?   Posting an angry rant here is cathartic, but it doesn&#039;t do much to get things done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jk,  you are preaching to the choir.  Also, you obviously didn&#8217;t follow UI,s link to where at least these liberals have called tom carpet out.   Have you called his office?  have you tried to write to the news urinal?   Posting an angry rant here is cathartic, but it doesn&#8217;t do much to get things done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just kiddin</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163315</link>
		<dc:creator>just kiddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163315</guid>
		<description>It simply is a mystery to me how so many people havent a clue as to what is going on in DC. Would someone please list those &quot;not for profit&quot; insurance companies! The only ones I know of are Medicare, Medicaid and the VA. Those are single payer systems.

It is carpetbagger Carper who is destroying the public option. He is bringing his &quot;exchanges&quot;, and Opt in/Opt out&quot; garbage to Reid behind closed doors with Lincoln, Leiberman, Nelson and Landrieu.

It will be Delaware who will be credited with loosing the Public Option, because it is Tom Carper who continues to fight against the citizens and on behalf of the insurance companies. How fast can you spell traitor, treasonist, prostitute? Even Howard Dean had the courage to call Carper out. He is a &quot;silly man&quot;, and an obstructionist. I thought all you libs supported Howard Dean. Is it because you don&#039;t want to lash out at the person responsible for the Public Option destruction because he is a demorat? What hypocrisy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It simply is a mystery to me how so many people havent a clue as to what is going on in DC. Would someone please list those &#8220;not for profit&#8221; insurance companies! The only ones I know of are Medicare, Medicaid and the VA. Those are single payer systems.</p>
<p>It is carpetbagger Carper who is destroying the public option. He is bringing his &#8220;exchanges&#8221;, and Opt in/Opt out&#8221; garbage to Reid behind closed doors with Lincoln, Leiberman, Nelson and Landrieu.</p>
<p>It will be Delaware who will be credited with loosing the Public Option, because it is Tom Carper who continues to fight against the citizens and on behalf of the insurance companies. How fast can you spell traitor, treasonist, prostitute? Even Howard Dean had the courage to call Carper out. He is a &#8220;silly man&#8221;, and an obstructionist. I thought all you libs supported Howard Dean. Is it because you don&#8217;t want to lash out at the person responsible for the Public Option destruction because he is a demorat? What hypocrisy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163312</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163312</guid>
		<description>Perry,

Canada&#039;s system and the U.K.&#039;s system is like that as well.  Many companies offer supplemental insurance.  Even Medicare has supplements.  It&#039;s a system that works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perry,</p>
<p>Canada&#8217;s system and the U.K.&#8217;s system is like that as well.  Many companies offer supplemental insurance.  Even Medicare has supplements.  It&#8217;s a system that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163311</link>
		<dc:creator>Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163311</guid>
		<description>UI: &lt;I&gt;&quot;I don’t see a problem with supplemental for-profit health insurance but I believe everyone is entitled to basic health care.&quot;&lt;/I&gt;

You are describing &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Switzerland&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Swiss system&lt;/a&gt;, so yours is no pipe dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UI: <i>&#8220;I don’t see a problem with supplemental for-profit health insurance but I believe everyone is entitled to basic health care.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>You are describing <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Switzerland" rel="nofollow">the Swiss system</a>, so yours is no pipe dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geezer</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/06/this-is-why-we-need-the-public-option/#comment-163310</link>
		<dc:creator>Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32244#comment-163310</guid>
		<description>Hey, why didn&#039;t I get an email alert that we were bashing a Moron Pinata?

&quot;And for those who argue that there should not be for-profit insurance companies, consider that people have to eat. Why should we let farmers, food processors, grocers and restaurants make any profit at all? Is it more important that they be allowed to profit or that people be allowed to eat?&quot;

To pick just one of a score of differences, because those in the food stream produce something. Those in health insurance produce nothing.

There, I&#039;ve started you off. You should be able to compile another 19 differences by lunchtime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, why didn&#8217;t I get an email alert that we were bashing a Moron Pinata?</p>
<p>&#8220;And for those who argue that there should not be for-profit insurance companies, consider that people have to eat. Why should we let farmers, food processors, grocers and restaurants make any profit at all? Is it more important that they be allowed to profit or that people be allowed to eat?&#8221;</p>
<p>To pick just one of a score of differences, because those in the food stream produce something. Those in health insurance produce nothing.</p>
<p>There, I&#8217;ve started you off. You should be able to compile another 19 differences by lunchtime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

