<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Bulo Remembers 2009-The Most Censored News Stories of the Year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: El Somnambulo</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/#comment-162995</link>
		<dc:creator>El Somnambulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32147#comment-162995</guid>
		<description>Ben Bagdikian, the first ombudsman for the Washington Post, points out how, since 1983, the companies that own all of the US&#039; dominant mass media have shrunk from 50 to 5.

Here&#039;s an excerpt from his book, &#039;The New Media Monopoly&#039;: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Bagdikian/Big_Five_TNMM.html

The predominant media is controlled by a very select powerful few. Yes, there are lots of new resources, but they are outside of, and far less powerful than, mass media outlets. 

It&#039;s due in large part to the Gingrich legislation and an FCC that supported monopolistic practices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Bagdikian, the first ombudsman for the Washington Post, points out how, since 1983, the companies that own all of the US&#8217; dominant mass media have shrunk from 50 to 5.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an excerpt from his book, &#8216;The New Media Monopoly&#8217;: <a href="http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Bagdikian/Big_Five_TNMM.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Bagdikian/Big_Five_TNMM.html</a></p>
<p>The predominant media is controlled by a very select powerful few. Yes, there are lots of new resources, but they are outside of, and far less powerful than, mass media outlets. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s due in large part to the Gingrich legislation and an FCC that supported monopolistic practices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooke</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/#comment-162989</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32147#comment-162989</guid>
		<description>I disagree. People in large cities used to have a choice of newspapers, sometime. But, despite monopolistic practices in broadcast media, people today have a much wider choice of sources than our grandparents could hope to. With a cell phone camera you&#039;re a broadcast journalist. 

But if you look at media outlets even as recently as the 30&#039;s, or what passed for &quot;free speech&quot; during the 40&#039;s, it&#039;s clear that, despite deregulation, the potential information stream continues to grow.

Still all lies, of course. But Twain remarked on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. People in large cities used to have a choice of newspapers, sometime. But, despite monopolistic practices in broadcast media, people today have a much wider choice of sources than our grandparents could hope to. With a cell phone camera you&#8217;re a broadcast journalist. </p>
<p>But if you look at media outlets even as recently as the 30&#8217;s, or what passed for &#8220;free speech&#8221; during the 40&#8217;s, it&#8217;s clear that, despite deregulation, the potential information stream continues to grow.</p>
<p>Still all lies, of course. But Twain remarked on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Somnambulo</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/#comment-162984</link>
		<dc:creator>El Somnambulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32147#comment-162984</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s not misdated. I referred to the legislation that Gingrich pushed through enabling, for example, Rupert Murdoch, to own both newspapers and television stations. It has led to mergers and acquisitions that have severely shrunk the scope and diversity of the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s not misdated. I referred to the legislation that Gingrich pushed through enabling, for example, Rupert Murdoch, to own both newspapers and television stations. It has led to mergers and acquisitions that have severely shrunk the scope and diversity of the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooke</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/#comment-162963</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32147#comment-162963</guid>
		<description>Well, I think the &quot;corporate takeover&quot; of government is a little miss-dated, here.

A charming example, of course, is the impact of William Randolph Hearst on public policy, but it&#039;s hardly the only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think the &#8220;corporate takeover&#8221; of government is a little miss-dated, here.</p>
<p>A charming example, of course, is the impact of William Randolph Hearst on public policy, but it&#8217;s hardly the only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Somnambulo</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/#comment-162914</link>
		<dc:creator>El Somnambulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32147#comment-162914</guid>
		<description>Link corrected. 

Now let me get this straight. B/c one of the 25 stories was about the Trilateral Commission, none of the other 24 are worth reading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link corrected. </p>
<p>Now let me get this straight. B/c one of the 25 stories was about the Trilateral Commission, none of the other 24 are worth reading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cassandra_m</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/#comment-162913</link>
		<dc:creator>cassandra_m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32147#comment-162913</guid>
		<description>The middle two links are the same story.  And like xstryker, I&#039;m not too inclined to give much credence to the Trilateral Commission stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The middle two links are the same story.  And like xstryker, I&#8217;m not too inclined to give much credence to the Trilateral Commission stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xstryker</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/12/03/bulo-remembers-2009-the-most-censored-news-stories-of-the-year/#comment-162893</link>
		<dc:creator>xstryker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=32147#comment-162893</guid>
		<description>As soon as I saw the article on the Trilateral Commission, I stopped taking this seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as I saw the article on the Trilateral Commission, I stopped taking this seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

