Flip Floppin’ McCain
I’m not even sure of the best word to describe this story. Is McCain just lying and hoping nobody can remember his health care plan from last year? Is he just become senile? Is he just a douchenozzle? Is McCain bitter, a hypocrite, a liar, a hypocritical liar?
Madame President, simply put, this motion to commit would be a requirement that we eliminate the half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts that is envisioned by this bill. A half a trillion dollars in cuts that are unspecified as to how, and a half a trillion dollars in cuts that would directly impact the health care of citizens in this country. … All of these are cuts in the obligations that we have assumed and are the rightful benefits that people have earned. … I will eagerly look forward to hearing from the authors of this legislation as to how they can possibly achieve a half a trillion dollars in cuts without impacting existing Medicare programs negatively and eventually lead to rationing of health care in this country. That is what this motion is all about. This motion is to eliminate those unwarranted cuts.
McCain’s record says something different…
McCain was for far more drastic Medicare cuts before he was against them. In October 2008, the McCain campaign announced that the Senator would pay for his health plan “with major reductions to Medicare and Medicaid…in a move that independent analysts estimate could result in cuts of $1.3 trillion over 10 years to the government programs.” Those cuts would have reduced Medicare and Medicaid spending by as much as 20% over 10 years and cut into benefits.
In 1997, McCain (along with many Democrats) voted for a series of Medicare cuts as part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. That act decreased Medicare spending by 12.7% over 10 years and instituted the kind of payment updates that the Senate bill is now recommending. In 1995, moreover, Republicans sought to cut 14% from projected Medicare spending over seven years and force millions of elderly recipients into managed health care programs or HMOs. As Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich admitted, “We don’t want to get rid of it in round one because we don’t think it’s politically smart,” he said. “But we believe that it’s going to wither on the vine because we think [seniors] are going to leave it voluntarily.”
Of course, stripping this funding mechanism will remove half of the money being used to pay for the bill. One of my biggest pet peeves with the media is that it seems to have no memory. Most MSM outlets won’t point out the glaring contradictions in his statement. Thank goodness for blogs and The Daily Show.
John McCain needs to retire. If there is anything that demonstrates how completely craven this man is, this would be it. AND McCain’s health care proposals had elements that are being included (through the back door) in this bill. As in eliminating the tax break for employers who provide health insurance and taxing the recipients directly. (This bill calls for an excise tax on “gold-plated” plans, which starts to eliminate the tax break.) So instead of standing up for ideas that he once thought were important the only thing important now is playing politics.
it is kind of like being for a war before you were against it? (insert snark)
In all honesty, I’d rather have senator McCain than senator minute man, or senator teabag, or senator beckian apostle. If he has to tack right to get the votes of the insane fringe I’m willing to let him. It isnt like Fixed news will report his flip floppiness. they only do that with democrats and they only do it if they can lie or report it out of context.
Republicans lie. Always!