Comments on: White House Gatecrashers: Fascinating?

By: Progressive Mom

Progressive Mom — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:18:11 +0000

I dunno, Lizard, we never did find out why that male prostitute had a press pass to the White House during the Bush Administration, and kept logging himself in at odd times….

Oh, wait, that was a Republican administration.

Never mind.

By: Lizard

Lizard — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:07:06 +0000

When asked what she does with event crashers, Rogers replied (to much laughter), that she’s begun adding an extra table, row, or bench to every event she produces, as each time she found extra people would show up in hopes of gaining entrance. “Lots of people just come anyways, they won’t take no for an answer,” she said. “Finally I just said, ‘Alright, come on in, it’s no use kicking you out.’”
Party Planner Trade Magazine “Biz Bash” June 2009

hmmmm makes you wonder who is being “invited” but kept off the official guest list…

By: J.Stewart

J.Stewart — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:53:15 +0000

nothing to see here folks, move along…

White House ‘Stonewalling’ »
NY Daily News ^ | 12/2/2009 | Michael McAuliff

The White House says it will not send social secretary Desiree Rogers up to the Hill to testify about how a couple of alleged gate-crashers sashayed into the India state dinner last week uninvited.

And that “is clearly stonewalling,” Rep. Pete King (R-Long Island) told The Mouth.

King, the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, wanted Rogers to come explain, either in private or public, why no one from her office was at the White House entrance where Michaele and Tareq Sahali made their now-infamous entrance.

Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson agreed with King, and invited Rogers to attend.

The Mouth was informed earlier that Rogers would not be coming, and White House mouthpiece Robert Gibbs just made it official.

By: a.price

a.price — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:12:36 +0000

how can anyone not be outraged? Put it into context with these facts
1The right wing CONSTANTLY paints obama as a danger to all things american… a force that must be stopped.. at any cost.
2 Obama received more death threats in his first month in office than did Bush AND Clinton in their combinded terms… he continues to get them
3 the secret service did not do a good enough job protecting another president. (kennedy)

Not only should they be charged, but careers should end. Their intentions were not violent, but in my opinion the country got lucky. It is infuriating that a president with as many hate groups dedicated to eliminating him as this one has such a failure of a secret service detail.

By: Brooke

Brooke — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:40:26 +0000

You know, if they actually do that AND someone was fired over it, wonder if that money could be tapped for victims compensation. I’d certainly be getting a lawyer to try for it.

By: MJ

MJ — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:34:49 +0000

It now seems that these two starfu***rs are trying to sell their story to the highest bidder for somewhere in the range of $500,000.

By: Rebecca

Rebecca — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:19:27 +0000

Sorry Cassandra for going off topic but,

Unbiased, I never blather. These are pearls of wisdom I share here.

Onward!

By: missundaztood

missundaztood — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:15:35 +0000

You can’t have gate crashers at the White House, ever, and the President of the United States can never look that vulnerable. Someone should be fired.

By: Andy

Andy — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:53:48 +0000

What a crazy story. Someone from the Secret Service had to get fired/reassigned for this. I wonder what they said to get in, and if they lied about who they were or their credentials.

By: cassandra_m

cassandra_m — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:53:26 +0000

No — what you figured is that you would hijack this thread with more of your bullshit. So stop it.

By: Unbiased American

Unbiased American — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:11:33 +0000

Cassandra — I figured that since “the culture of hate that has grown up around the right-wing asylum” is on topic, I’d point out that said culture of hate does not exist and that the actual hatemongers are planted residing comfortably on the left.

By: cassandra_m

cassandra_m — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:09:06 +0000

Hey, RWR or Unbiased American or whatever your sockpuppet name is today — your post is not on topic for this thread.

You are warned and might just be gone for the sockpuppetry.

By: MJ

MJ — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:56:13 +0000

I think they should be brought up on charges (trespassing?) and as part of their plea bargain they can never profit from this, even mentioning it on Facebook or on The “Real” HOuSewives of DC” if she gets on it. I’m also interested in what Bravo TV execs actually knew about their plans to crash the party.

I agree with Cassandra about “reality” TV.

By: Unbiased American

Unbiased American — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:52:51 +0000

By the way, Rebecca, when you blather on about “the culture of hate that has grown up around the right-wing asylum”, are you talking about the so-called murder of a census employee down in Kentucky? You know, the one that turned out to be a suicide with a twist of insurance fraud? In that case, the only hate was that spewed by the left-wing hate machine when liberal media personalities and bloggers laid the blame for Sparkman’s death at the feet of their political opponents because they had dared to exercise their First Amendment right to engage in political speech of the nature that had been labeled “the highest form of patriotism” when the Left did it during the Bush years.

Indeed, have any of those lefties bothered to admit that they were hatefully wrong in their assessment, and apologize to those patriotic Americans who they libeled by name (Limbaugh, Beck, Palin Bachman, etc)? You know, since the left claims to be the “reality based community”. Or is their reality, like their president, not grounded in the truth?

By: Unbiased American

Unbiased American — Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:46:57 +0000

Oh, and there seems to be some evidence that a member of the Indian Embassy staff may have gotten them in.