<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neoconservatives rail against Eritrean dictator Isaias Afewerki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/19/neoconservatives-rail-against-eritrean-dictator-isaias-afewerki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/19/neoconservatives-rail-against-eritrean-dictator-isaias-afewerki/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:56:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/19/neoconservatives-rail-against-eritrean-dictator-isaias-afewerki/#comment-162014</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31699#comment-162014</guid>
		<description>Xstryker you is a fool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xstryker you is a fool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xstryker</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/19/neoconservatives-rail-against-eritrean-dictator-isaias-afewerki/#comment-161619</link>
		<dc:creator>xstryker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31699#comment-161619</guid>
		<description>Hah, so you admit that you don&#039;t care about Eritrea or Swaziland or Laos. Democracy only matters when it&#039;s economically strategic with you people.

In re: Honduras, here&#039;s a comment from the same post you link to:
&lt;blockquote&gt;If you read carefully art. 239 it develops around a PROPOSAL, and that proposal does not exist. Zelaya is making barely an announcement of an unverified event, but never he is making any proposal. You could say that he indirectly wants people to support reeelection, but he is making absolutely NO PROPOSAL AT ALL. Without proposal definitely there is no crime. That&#039;s why it is very important to listen carefully what he said and to read carefully the Constitution, in order to understand the legal meaning of &quot;proposal&quot;, completely differente from a guessing announcement of an unverified event, which obviously is not a crime.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Now of course, if there was any such language in the US Constitution, you&#039;d decry it as creating a thought crime. Your opposition to Zelaya has NOTHING to do with constitutional interpretation. It is all about two factors - 1. Money 2. Pride - That is fucking it and you know it.

And yes, I apologize for forgetting about the Pakistani election. I am aware of it, I listened to dozens of stories about it on NPR, and after doing several hours of research on Afewerki and Sayasone, I didn&#039;t stop to refresh my memory on the subject. I forgot, good catch, yada yada yada - but I&#039;m not the one who needs to prove that my value system isn&#039;t entirely subjective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, so you admit that you don&#8217;t care about Eritrea or Swaziland or Laos. Democracy only matters when it&#8217;s economically strategic with you people.</p>
<p>In re: Honduras, here&#8217;s a comment from the same post you link to:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you read carefully art. 239 it develops around a PROPOSAL, and that proposal does not exist. Zelaya is making barely an announcement of an unverified event, but never he is making any proposal. You could say that he indirectly wants people to support reeelection, but he is making absolutely NO PROPOSAL AT ALL. Without proposal definitely there is no crime. That&#8217;s why it is very important to listen carefully what he said and to read carefully the Constitution, in order to understand the legal meaning of &#8220;proposal&#8221;, completely differente from a guessing announcement of an unverified event, which obviously is not a crime.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now of course, if there was any such language in the US Constitution, you&#8217;d decry it as creating a thought crime. Your opposition to Zelaya has NOTHING to do with constitutional interpretation. It is all about two factors &#8211; 1. Money 2. Pride &#8211; That is fucking it and you know it.</p>
<p>And yes, I apologize for forgetting about the Pakistani election. I am aware of it, I listened to dozens of stories about it on NPR, and after doing several hours of research on Afewerki and Sayasone, I didn&#8217;t stop to refresh my memory on the subject. I forgot, good catch, yada yada yada &#8211; but I&#8217;m not the one who needs to prove that my value system isn&#8217;t entirely subjective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/19/neoconservatives-rail-against-eritrean-dictator-isaias-afewerki/#comment-161597</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31699#comment-161597</guid>
		<description>Would that Xstryker actually knew something about Honduras before he decided to write about it.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://lagringasblogicito.blogspot.com/2009/11/mel-zelaya-did-propose-reelection.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Article 239 of the Honduran constitution states that the President can only serve one term and that anyone who proposes to reform this disposition, directly or indirectly, immediately ceases in his position and is ineligible for any public function for 10 years.&lt;/a&gt;  Unfortunately, the Honduran Constitution does not have a provision for immediate impeachment, so the Supreme Court and Congress went about removing former President Zelaya in the only fashion it could.  He was replaced by the proper person, the leader of the Congress, who is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; running in the upcoming presidential election.  It wasn&#039;t a military coup, because civiliams are still firmly in control;; the military was used only to execute the order to depose Mr Zelaya.

Of course, a real military coup wouldn&#039;t have put Mr Zelaya on a plane out of the country; a real military coup would have put him in a box under the ground.

Most Latin American constitutions have strict provisions on term limits for their presidents, due to the history of so many &quot;presidents-for-life&quot; that they&#039;ve been forced to suffer.

&lt;blockquote&gt;That’s it. Threat assessment is not a factor – otherwise they would be considering the danger posed by Pervez Musharraf’s nukes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you think we neocons aren&#039;t concerned about Pakistan, you are very mistaken; we just don&#039;t have a good alternative in there.  But someone actually informed about the situation would know that President Musharraf has been out of office for over a year now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would that Xstryker actually knew something about Honduras before he decided to write about it.  <a href="http://lagringasblogicito.blogspot.com/2009/11/mel-zelaya-did-propose-reelection.html" rel="nofollow">Article 239 of the Honduran constitution states that the President can only serve one term and that anyone who proposes to reform this disposition, directly or indirectly, immediately ceases in his position and is ineligible for any public function for 10 years.</a>  Unfortunately, the Honduran Constitution does not have a provision for immediate impeachment, so the Supreme Court and Congress went about removing former President Zelaya in the only fashion it could.  He was replaced by the proper person, the leader of the Congress, who is <i>not</i> running in the upcoming presidential election.  It wasn&#8217;t a military coup, because civiliams are still firmly in control;; the military was used only to execute the order to depose Mr Zelaya.</p>
<p>Of course, a real military coup wouldn&#8217;t have put Mr Zelaya on a plane out of the country; a real military coup would have put him in a box under the ground.</p>
<p>Most Latin American constitutions have strict provisions on term limits for their presidents, due to the history of so many &#8220;presidents-for-life&#8221; that they&#8217;ve been forced to suffer.</p>
<blockquote><p>That’s it. Threat assessment is not a factor – otherwise they would be considering the danger posed by Pervez Musharraf’s nukes.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you think we neocons aren&#8217;t concerned about Pakistan, you are very mistaken; we just don&#8217;t have a good alternative in there.  But someone actually informed about the situation would know that President Musharraf has been out of office for over a year now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a.price</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/19/neoconservatives-rail-against-eritrean-dictator-isaias-afewerki/#comment-161260</link>
		<dc:creator>a.price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31699#comment-161260</guid>
		<description>spot on. they dont have principles. Just campaign rhetoric and gutter tactics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spot on. they dont have principles. Just campaign rhetoric and gutter tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

