<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lather, Rinse, Repeat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:20:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brooke</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160301</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160301</guid>
		<description>Well, much as I love a post that&#039;s all about the hotness of female politicians... I&#039;d say the trend toward &#039;telegenic&#039; is true for both parties, and, increasingly, for both genders.

It&#039;s sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, much as I love a post that&#8217;s all about the hotness of female politicians&#8230; I&#8217;d say the trend toward &#8216;telegenic&#8217; is true for both parties, and, increasingly, for both genders.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geezer</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160292</link>
		<dc:creator>Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160292</guid>
		<description>&quot;when Democrats say it, it’s MISOGYNY. In all caps&quot;

Republican definition of misogyny: Failure to appreciate how Sarah Palin&#039;s hotness outweighs her empty-headedness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;when Democrats say it, it’s MISOGYNY. In all caps&#8221;</p>
<p>Republican definition of misogyny: Failure to appreciate how Sarah Palin&#8217;s hotness outweighs her empty-headedness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160291</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160291</guid>
		<description>These are also the same people who get excited when they look at the picture of Reagan in his cowboy hat and his lopsided grin. I think they are a little bisexual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are also the same people who get excited when they look at the picture of Reagan in his cowboy hat and his lopsided grin. I think they are a little bisexual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemski</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160287</link>
		<dc:creator>nemski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160287</guid>
		<description>I remember when she winked; I threw up a little in my mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when she winked; I threw up a little in my mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160285</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160285</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDYzMGFiNjQ0MWRjNmI0ZTlkYjgwZTExMjA3MWNiZTk=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rich Lowry, from the &lt;i&gt;National Review&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m sure I&#039;m not the only male in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, sat up a little straighter on the couch and said, &quot;Hey, I think she just winked at me.&quot; And her smile. By the end, when she clearly knew she was doing well, it was so sparkling it was almost mesmerizing. It sent little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around the living rooms of America. This is a quality that can&#039;t be learned; it&#039;s either something you have or you don&#039;t, and man, she&#039;s got it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Starbursts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NDYzMGFiNjQ0MWRjNmI0ZTlkYjgwZTExMjA3MWNiZTk=" rel="nofollow">Rich Lowry, from the <i>National Review</i>:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m not the only male in America who, when Palin dropped her first wink, sat up a little straighter on the couch and said, &#8220;Hey, I think she just winked at me.&#8221; And her smile. By the end, when she clearly knew she was doing well, it was so sparkling it was almost mesmerizing. It sent little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around the living rooms of America. This is a quality that can&#8217;t be learned; it&#8217;s either something you have or you don&#8217;t, and man, she&#8217;s got it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Starbursts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemski</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160284</link>
		<dc:creator>nemski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160284</guid>
		<description>Remember the guy from one of the national conservative magazines who wrote that he got sexually excited when Palin winked during the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the guy from one of the national conservative magazines who wrote that he got sexually excited when Palin winked during the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160280</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160280</guid>
		<description>Republicans bring up how &quot;hot&quot; their candidates and media personnel are frequently.  That makes one stop and ponder:  why?  What does that have to do with running the country, a business or the media?

And, during the campaign, it was the right that brought up Palin&#039;s &quot;Hotness&quot; over and over and over.

Take, for instance, neo-con radio host Chris Baker who said, after the Palin-Biden debate, that Palin &quot;shouldn&#039;t had a little cleavage going....&quot;[d]istract [Sen.] Joe Biden a little bit,&quot; and added: &quot;[S]how your stuff, you know what I&#039;m saying? Use all your assets.&quot; He then said: &quot;By the way, I noticed a panty line on her. ... When they turned to walk to the podium, I saw a panty line.&quot; 
(h/t:  media matters)

When Republicans say this stuff, it&#039;s support for Palin; when Democrats say it, it&#039;s MISOGYNY.  In all caps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans bring up how &#8220;hot&#8221; their candidates and media personnel are frequently.  That makes one stop and ponder:  why?  What does that have to do with running the country, a business or the media?</p>
<p>And, during the campaign, it was the right that brought up Palin&#8217;s &#8220;Hotness&#8221; over and over and over.</p>
<p>Take, for instance, neo-con radio host Chris Baker who said, after the Palin-Biden debate, that Palin &#8220;shouldn&#8217;t had a little cleavage going&#8230;.&#8221;[d]istract [Sen.] Joe Biden a little bit,&#8221; and added: &#8220;[S]how your stuff, you know what I&#8217;m saying? Use all your assets.&#8221; He then said: &#8220;By the way, I noticed a panty line on her. &#8230; When they turned to walk to the podium, I saw a panty line.&#8221;<br />
(h/t:  media matters)</p>
<p>When Republicans say this stuff, it&#8217;s support for Palin; when Democrats say it, it&#8217;s MISOGYNY.  In all caps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160275</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160275</guid>
		<description>Being incompetent makes you incompetent.  It has nothing to do with looks.  My point is that the women at the top of the Republican party have a few things in common: the willingness to say outrageous things, especially beliefs pushed by the far right fringe, a huge ego and in general, good looks.

Nemski pointed out there are way more accomplished women in the Republican party like Jodi Rell, who until recently was the most popular governor in the nation and some of the others he pointed out.

The problem is part from our sexist culture and part from the misogyny of the right.  Pandora wrote just last week about another article from a conservative &quot;our women are good looking and your women aren&#039;t, neener neener.&quot;  Perhaps if conservative punditry would stop saying things like that we might take their arguments about women a little more seriously.

Jason,

Yes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder but you can&#039;t seriously argue with me that Ann Coulter didn&#039;t rise to prominence because she was willing to act as a female misogynist (she once argued women shouldn&#039;t vote) while having long blonde hair and wearing black cocktail dresses.  She hasn&#039;t aged all that well but that is how she came to be noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being incompetent makes you incompetent.  It has nothing to do with looks.  My point is that the women at the top of the Republican party have a few things in common: the willingness to say outrageous things, especially beliefs pushed by the far right fringe, a huge ego and in general, good looks.</p>
<p>Nemski pointed out there are way more accomplished women in the Republican party like Jodi Rell, who until recently was the most popular governor in the nation and some of the others he pointed out.</p>
<p>The problem is part from our sexist culture and part from the misogyny of the right.  Pandora wrote just last week about another article from a conservative &#8220;our women are good looking and your women aren&#8217;t, neener neener.&#8221;  Perhaps if conservative punditry would stop saying things like that we might take their arguments about women a little more seriously.</p>
<p>Jason,</p>
<p>Yes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder but you can&#8217;t seriously argue with me that Ann Coulter didn&#8217;t rise to prominence because she was willing to act as a female misogynist (she once argued women shouldn&#8217;t vote) while having long blonde hair and wearing black cocktail dresses.  She hasn&#8217;t aged all that well but that is how she came to be noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nemski</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160265</link>
		<dc:creator>nemski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160265</guid>
		<description>UI, these Republican women are even at the top - that&#039;s the scary part. You hardly ever hear Republicans mention Jan Brewer, Jodi Rell, Linda Lingle, Lisa Murkowski, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Mary Bono Mack, Ginny Brown-Waite, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Lynn Jenkins, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UI, these Republican women are even at the top &#8211; that&#8217;s the scary part. You hardly ever hear Republicans mention Jan Brewer, Jodi Rell, Linda Lingle, Lisa Murkowski, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Kay Bailey Hutchinson, Mary Bono Mack, Ginny Brown-Waite, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Lynn Jenkins, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom S</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160263</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160263</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the mistake, 

but are they good looking? Does being good looking make you incompetent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the mistake, </p>
<p>but are they good looking? Does being good looking make you incompetent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160261</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160261</guid>
		<description>Tom, I am a she, not a he.

I spin it as sexist because the women who have risen to the top are in this system are incompetent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I am a she, not a he.</p>
<p>I spin it as sexist because the women who have risen to the top are in this system are incompetent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason330</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160260</link>
		<dc:creator>jason330</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160260</guid>
		<description>Some say that Ann Coulter is a skank with little floppy tits, cigarette burns all over her arms and a wicked case of venereal warts.  (Don&#039;t shoot the messenger!)    Anyway, what is she doing on the list of good looking women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some say that Ann Coulter is a skank with little floppy tits, cigarette burns all over her arms and a wicked case of venereal warts.  (Don&#8217;t shoot the messenger!)    Anyway, what is she doing on the list of good looking women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom S</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160258</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160258</guid>
		<description>Anonone, exactly the point...beauty is in the eyes of the beholder...and isotope chooses to spin it as sexist, based on his def of beauty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonone, exactly the point&#8230;beauty is in the eyes of the beholder&#8230;and isotope chooses to spin it as sexist, based on his def of beauty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wikwox</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160255</link>
		<dc:creator>wikwox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160255</guid>
		<description>Ah, but beauty is a fleeting thing for it doth charm then disappoint. I suggest all good conservatives (and the rotten evil ones as well) back Palin and Michele Bachman with all thier time and money.Go ahead, you diserve it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but beauty is a fleeting thing for it doth charm then disappoint. I suggest all good conservatives (and the rotten evil ones as well) back Palin and Michele Bachman with all thier time and money.Go ahead, you diserve it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonone</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/14/lather-rinse-repeat/comment-page-1/#comment-160254</link>
		<dc:creator>anonone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31443#comment-160254</guid>
		<description>Tom S. - Monica? Hillary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom S. &#8211; Monica? Hillary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
