<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Abortion Democrats Betraying Women Once Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:16:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brooke</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159157</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159157</guid>
		<description>&quot;Abortion rights&quot; isn&#039;t about whether rich people will get abortions. They will. It&#039;s an attack on poor families. That&#039;s the essence of GOP policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Abortion rights&#8221; isn&#8217;t about whether rich people will get abortions. They will. It&#8217;s an attack on poor families. That&#8217;s the essence of GOP policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159151</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159151</guid>
		<description>Chances are if you have private insurance you&#039;re already paying for abortions with your premiums.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chances are if you have private insurance you&#8217;re already paying for abortions with your premiums.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159150</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159150</guid>
		<description>&quot;Americans won&#039;t tolerate paying for abortions.&quot;

Unless it&#039;s that American&#039;s daughter, sister, mother, best friend, etc.  If Americans didn&#039;t tolerate it, it wouldn&#039;t be happening.

But why did the Republican majority Congress &quot;tolerate&quot; abortion without changing a single thing about it for 6 years with a Republican president and a Republican-conservative majority in the Supreme Court?  

Who are, really, the hypocrites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Americans won&#8217;t tolerate paying for abortions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unless it&#8217;s that American&#8217;s daughter, sister, mother, best friend, etc.  If Americans didn&#8217;t tolerate it, it wouldn&#8217;t be happening.</p>
<p>But why did the Republican majority Congress &#8220;tolerate&#8221; abortion without changing a single thing about it for 6 years with a Republican president and a Republican-conservative majority in the Supreme Court?  </p>
<p>Who are, really, the hypocrites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159143</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159143</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re not the party of purgers, that&#039;s the Republicans.  I&#039;m asking that Democrats stand up for women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not the party of purgers, that&#8217;s the Republicans.  I&#8217;m asking that Democrats stand up for women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159141</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159141</guid>
		<description>Purge those Dems and go back to a pathetic minority.  Americans won&#039;t tolerate paying for abortions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Purge those Dems and go back to a pathetic minority.  Americans won&#8217;t tolerate paying for abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159109</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159109</guid>
		<description>&quot;...have their sex lives controlled.&quot;

This is the real agenda.  Many of the most vocal anti-abortion folks are also against any form of birth control, against the morning after pill and against any form of sex education in public schools, except for &quot;don&#039;t do it.&quot;

This is not a hidden agenda, by the way.  It&#039;s very up-front, but the MSM doesn&#039;t showcase it.

This also is one of the reasons that Republicans don&#039;t actually propose doing anything to stop abortions.  They just step in to stop legislation they don&#039;t want under any conditions; abortion gives them cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;have their sex lives controlled.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the real agenda.  Many of the most vocal anti-abortion folks are also against any form of birth control, against the morning after pill and against any form of sex education in public schools, except for &#8220;don&#8217;t do it.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not a hidden agenda, by the way.  It&#8217;s very up-front, but the MSM doesn&#8217;t showcase it.</p>
<p>This also is one of the reasons that Republicans don&#8217;t actually propose doing anything to stop abortions.  They just step in to stop legislation they don&#8217;t want under any conditions; abortion gives them cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159106</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159106</guid>
		<description>Anti-abortion protestors know in their hearts that a fetus is not a child, even if they won&#039;t admit it.  Why do you think even crazy Tom Coburn has performed abortions in the case of ectopic pregnancy?  It&#039;s because it is not a viable pregnancy and there is a high risk to the already-a-person woman.  It&#039;s why anti-abortion protestors don&#039;t call for the imprisonment of women.  They have convinced themselves that women are children who need to be told what to do and to have their sex lives controlled.

Let me bring up the fertility clinic conundrum for the anti-choice folks:

You&#039;re in a fertility clinic when a fire breaks out.  You have to get out fast.  In one room is a 2-year-old child, in the other room there are 100 frozen blastocysts.  You only have time to go to one room.  Do you save the 2-year-old or do you save the 100 blastocysts?  If you really believe a blastocyst is a person, you&#039;d be saving 100 lives as opposed to just one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-abortion protestors know in their hearts that a fetus is not a child, even if they won&#8217;t admit it.  Why do you think even crazy Tom Coburn has performed abortions in the case of ectopic pregnancy?  It&#8217;s because it is not a viable pregnancy and there is a high risk to the already-a-person woman.  It&#8217;s why anti-abortion protestors don&#8217;t call for the imprisonment of women.  They have convinced themselves that women are children who need to be told what to do and to have their sex lives controlled.</p>
<p>Let me bring up the fertility clinic conundrum for the anti-choice folks:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re in a fertility clinic when a fire breaks out.  You have to get out fast.  In one room is a 2-year-old child, in the other room there are 100 frozen blastocysts.  You only have time to go to one room.  Do you save the 2-year-old or do you save the 100 blastocysts?  If you really believe a blastocyst is a person, you&#8217;d be saving 100 lives as opposed to just one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159092</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 19:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159092</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah Mike - forgot to ask..since you see the unborn as a child and believe they should be carried to full term etc. - so do you then agree that all pregnant women, regardless of their background and current health insurance status, should receive any and all health care needed throughout their pregnancy to ensure a full-term birth and healthy baby? As well as that all children born to mothers without health insurance should receive full health care to ensure that they are and stay healthy?

This would mean that all doctors and hospitals would have to accept these mothers and children even if they can not afford to pay for it.

Oh - and what about pregnant illegal immigrants that - for the safety of the unborn child - can not get sent back to their countries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah Mike &#8211; forgot to ask..since you see the unborn as a child and believe they should be carried to full term etc. &#8211; so do you then agree that all pregnant women, regardless of their background and current health insurance status, should receive any and all health care needed throughout their pregnancy to ensure a full-term birth and healthy baby? As well as that all children born to mothers without health insurance should receive full health care to ensure that they are and stay healthy?</p>
<p>This would mean that all doctors and hospitals would have to accept these mothers and children even if they can not afford to pay for it.</p>
<p>Oh &#8211; and what about pregnant illegal immigrants that &#8211; for the safety of the unborn child &#8211; can not get sent back to their countries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159088</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159088</guid>
		<description>&quot;There is nothing mainstream about killing an unborn child&quot;

A fetus is not a child - but that&#039;s a moot point with you.  A child can live outside of my body, outside of my womb - a child can eat on its own..Then again, you can always try to prove me wrong by trying to raise a zygote or blastocyst outside of the female womb into a full-term baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is nothing mainstream about killing an unborn child&#8221;</p>
<p>A fetus is not a child &#8211; but that&#8217;s a moot point with you.  A child can live outside of my body, outside of my womb &#8211; a child can eat on its own..Then again, you can always try to prove me wrong by trying to raise a zygote or blastocyst outside of the female womb into a full-term baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Progressive Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159086</link>
		<dc:creator>Progressive Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 18:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159086</guid>
		<description>Republicans had the White House, both houses of Congress and the Supreme Court.

Where was the Republican bill to end, stem the flow of, or limit abortion?

Oh, there was none.

Why -- because Republicans need the anti-abortion movement voters, and the only way to capture those votes is to keep abortion legal.

At least Democrats and others who are pro-choice are honest about their position.  Most Republicans in congress, including the entire leadership, and George Bush are compltely dishonest ... abortion is the best vote-getter they have, and they aren&#039;t going to do anything about it.  Except shed crocodile tears.

Disgusting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans had the White House, both houses of Congress and the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Where was the Republican bill to end, stem the flow of, or limit abortion?</p>
<p>Oh, there was none.</p>
<p>Why &#8212; because Republicans need the anti-abortion movement voters, and the only way to capture those votes is to keep abortion legal.</p>
<p>At least Democrats and others who are pro-choice are honest about their position.  Most Republicans in congress, including the entire leadership, and George Bush are compltely dishonest &#8230; abortion is the best vote-getter they have, and they aren&#8217;t going to do anything about it.  Except shed crocodile tears.</p>
<p>Disgusting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159077</link>
		<dc:creator>pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159077</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take Mikey and his ilk seriously when they start calling for the arrest and prison sentence of women who have abortions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take Mikey and his ilk seriously when they start calling for the arrest and prison sentence of women who have abortions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooke</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159074</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159074</guid>
		<description>Mike, when you&#039;ve been pregnant for as many years as I have, you can tell me how to feel about choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, when you&#8217;ve been pregnant for as many years as I have, you can tell me how to feel about choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delaware Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159071</link>
		<dc:creator>Delaware Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159071</guid>
		<description>The saddest post in many days.

&quot;Abortion is common, mainstream medical care. It is one of the most common surgical procedures in America.&quot; 

There is nothing mainstream about killing an unborn child. Liberals endlessly talk about the &quot;children&quot; whether it is money for schools or health care yet they totally disregard them before they are born as inconvenient entities. The party who attacked Bush for 4,000 war casualties supports over 1 million abortions a year or about 2,800 a day every day.

Don&#039;t try the choice argument as every war death was that of a volunteer and that does not make it right.

Take a look at Ted Kennedy and Al Gore to name two total sell outs to abortion who were adamantly against abortion early in their careers. They sold out to go national. Hypocrites at their best.

Look at this link and see if you can figure out the absolutely stupid plan Pelosi is attempting to pass.

http://gopleader.gov/UploadedFiles/JEC_Health_Chart_11-7-09.pdf

Mike Protack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The saddest post in many days.</p>
<p>&#8220;Abortion is common, mainstream medical care. It is one of the most common surgical procedures in America.&#8221; </p>
<p>There is nothing mainstream about killing an unborn child. Liberals endlessly talk about the &#8220;children&#8221; whether it is money for schools or health care yet they totally disregard them before they are born as inconvenient entities. The party who attacked Bush for 4,000 war casualties supports over 1 million abortions a year or about 2,800 a day every day.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t try the choice argument as every war death was that of a volunteer and that does not make it right.</p>
<p>Take a look at Ted Kennedy and Al Gore to name two total sell outs to abortion who were adamantly against abortion early in their careers. They sold out to go national. Hypocrites at their best.</p>
<p>Look at this link and see if you can figure out the absolutely stupid plan Pelosi is attempting to pass.</p>
<p><a href="http://gopleader.gov/UploadedFiles/JEC_Health_Chart_11-7-09.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://gopleader.gov/UploadedFiles/JEC_Health_Chart_11-7-09.pdf</a></p>
<p>Mike Protack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unstable Isotope</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/07/anti-abortion-democrats-betraying-women-once-again/#comment-159066</link>
		<dc:creator>Unstable Isotope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=31111#comment-159066</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/7/801671/-Pete-Sessions-compares-being-female-to-being-a-smoker&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;We have very well-informed members of Congress:&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;From Courthouse News Service:

&lt;blockquote&gt;In promoting the House health bill, New Jersey Democrat Frank Pallone made reference to discrimination by insurance companies, citing their reluctance to insure people with preexisting conditions and differences in costs based on gender. &quot;But that&#039;s not against the law,&quot; Texas Republican Pete Sessions said. 
    Pallone replied, &quot;No, but we would make it against the law. Why do you have a problem with that?&quot; he asked. &quot;Why should a woman pay more than a man?&quot; 
    &quot;Well, we&#039;re all different,&quot; Sessions explained. &quot;Why should a smoker pay more,&quot; he said before getting interrupted by a burst of chatter throughout the room.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, in Pete&#039;s mind, being a woman is just like being a smoker--being female just a destructive habit some people pick up that the rest of us shouldn&#039;t pay for.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/11/7/801671/-Pete-Sessions-compares-being-female-to-being-a-smoker" rel="nofollow">We have very well-informed members of Congress:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>From Courthouse News Service:</p>
<blockquote><p>In promoting the House health bill, New Jersey Democrat Frank Pallone made reference to discrimination by insurance companies, citing their reluctance to insure people with preexisting conditions and differences in costs based on gender. &#8220;But that&#8217;s not against the law,&#8221; Texas Republican Pete Sessions said.<br />
    Pallone replied, &#8220;No, but we would make it against the law. Why do you have a problem with that?&#8221; he asked. &#8220;Why should a woman pay more than a man?&#8221;<br />
    &#8220;Well, we&#8217;re all different,&#8221; Sessions explained. &#8220;Why should a smoker pay more,&#8221; he said before getting interrupted by a burst of chatter throughout the room.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, in Pete&#8217;s mind, being a woman is just like being a smoker&#8211;being female just a destructive habit some people pick up that the rest of us shouldn&#8217;t pay for.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

