<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding the Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/04/understanding-the-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/04/understanding-the-election/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:25:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott P</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/04/understanding-the-election/#comment-158507</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=30992#comment-158507</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Massachusetts plan gives everyone instant access and comparison to insurance plans but has not lowered costs one dime. The insurance companies have lost nothing.&lt;/i&gt;

Anyone want to take a guess as to whether Protack is right or wrong? Put on your surprised faces -- he&#039;s wrong! According to industry reports, premiums in Mass. have fallen significantly since reforms were passed.
&lt;blockquote&gt;And the results have been an enormous reduction in the cost of nongroup insurance in the state: The average individual premium in the state fell from $8,537 at the end of 2006 to $5,143 in mid-2009, a 40 percent reduction, while the rest of the nation was seeing a 14 percent increase.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I know it&#039;s like fish in a barrel, but I couldn&#039;t resist. And here is the link:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/11/massachusetts_provides_evidenc.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Massachusetts plan gives everyone instant access and comparison to insurance plans but has not lowered costs one dime. The insurance companies have lost nothing.</i></p>
<p>Anyone want to take a guess as to whether Protack is right or wrong? Put on your surprised faces &#8212; he&#8217;s wrong! According to industry reports, premiums in Mass. have fallen significantly since reforms were passed.</p>
<blockquote><p>And the results have been an enormous reduction in the cost of nongroup insurance in the state: The average individual premium in the state fell from $8,537 at the end of 2006 to $5,143 in mid-2009, a 40 percent reduction, while the rest of the nation was seeing a 14 percent increase.</p></blockquote>
<p>I know it&#8217;s like fish in a barrel, but I couldn&#8217;t resist. And here is the link:<br />
<a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/11/massachusetts_provides_evidenc.html" rel="nofollow">http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/11/massachusetts_provides_evidenc.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delaware Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/04/understanding-the-election/#comment-158492</link>
		<dc:creator>Delaware Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=30992#comment-158492</guid>
		<description>I agree with geezer a bit. Obama proved to be a great vote getter but an absent leader without conviction to any agenda. Super majority in the House and Senate have netted him zilch.

Health Care reform is AFU as Obama made deals with so many of the interested parties (Pharma and Insurance companies) that the issue got saturated by competing 1000 page bills and trillion dollar costs.

The Massachusetts plan gives everyone instant access and comparison to insurance plans but has not lowered costs one dime. The insurance companies have lost nothing.

Sadly, the public option so many people hold on to as the dream is unworkable and is doomed.

Mike Protack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with geezer a bit. Obama proved to be a great vote getter but an absent leader without conviction to any agenda. Super majority in the House and Senate have netted him zilch.</p>
<p>Health Care reform is AFU as Obama made deals with so many of the interested parties (Pharma and Insurance companies) that the issue got saturated by competing 1000 page bills and trillion dollar costs.</p>
<p>The Massachusetts plan gives everyone instant access and comparison to insurance plans but has not lowered costs one dime. The insurance companies have lost nothing.</p>
<p>Sadly, the public option so many people hold on to as the dream is unworkable and is doomed.</p>
<p>Mike Protack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geezer</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/04/understanding-the-election/#comment-158489</link>
		<dc:creator>Geezer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=30992#comment-158489</guid>
		<description>I disagree about passing health care. I&#039;m not interested in passing a bill that will likely enrich insurance companies, and a public option ain&#039;t gonna cut it. I&#039;ll vote for health care reform in 10 or 20 years, when single-payer comes to a vote.

For progressives, this is a situation in which half a loaf is worse than none, because I don&#039;t give a rip at this point whether Obama gets re-elected or not. As we learned under Bush, giving Republicans power leads to Democrats winning elections. Maybe our next Democratic president will actually have a progressive agenda he is willing to fight for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree about passing health care. I&#8217;m not interested in passing a bill that will likely enrich insurance companies, and a public option ain&#8217;t gonna cut it. I&#8217;ll vote for health care reform in 10 or 20 years, when single-payer comes to a vote.</p>
<p>For progressives, this is a situation in which half a loaf is worse than none, because I don&#8217;t give a rip at this point whether Obama gets re-elected or not. As we learned under Bush, giving Republicans power leads to Democrats winning elections. Maybe our next Democratic president will actually have a progressive agenda he is willing to fight for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cassandra_m</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/04/understanding-the-election/#comment-158485</link>
		<dc:creator>cassandra_m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=30992#comment-158485</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not as certain as x that NJ is such a serious loss.  Afterall, the legislature did not change hands and the CW there seemed to be that if Christie won that he would have some coattails.  People looking for change wanted it in the Governor&#039;s Mansion only it seems.

The lesson is you have to work at the purple areas and continue to deliver on stuff that will motivate people to vote for you.  This is the same lesson for portions of the Obama coalition too -- the kids and the independents especially are not so much tied to Democrats and they&#039;ve vote for you if you give them a reason to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not as certain as x that NJ is such a serious loss.  Afterall, the legislature did not change hands and the CW there seemed to be that if Christie won that he would have some coattails.  People looking for change wanted it in the Governor&#8217;s Mansion only it seems.</p>
<p>The lesson is you have to work at the purple areas and continue to deliver on stuff that will motivate people to vote for you.  This is the same lesson for portions of the Obama coalition too &#8212; the kids and the independents especially are not so much tied to Democrats and they&#8217;ve vote for you if you give them a reason to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/04/understanding-the-election/#comment-158477</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=30992#comment-158477</guid>
		<description>Actually, I agree with most of what X said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I agree with most of what X said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/11/04/understanding-the-election/#comment-158470</link>
		<dc:creator>pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=30992#comment-158470</guid>
		<description>Fascinating post.  Hope you don&#039;t mind, X, I added some spaces to make it easier to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating post.  Hope you don&#8217;t mind, X, I added some spaces to make it easier to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

