<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNREC Denies Delaware River Dredging Permit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/24/dnrec-denies-delaware-river-dredging-permit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/24/dnrec-denies-delaware-river-dredging-permit/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:15:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cassandra_m</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/24/dnrec-denies-delaware-river-dredging-permit/#comment-137146</link>
		<dc:creator>cassandra_m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=25683#comment-137146</guid>
		<description>The Philly Inquirer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/20090725_Delaware_River_dredging_plan_hits_a_snag.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;talks to the multiple stakeholders&lt;/a&gt; (mostly those in support of the dredging) and there is a consensus (of talking points at least) downplaying the Delaware decision and that they may not need Delaware&#039;s approval to do this project:
&lt;blockquote&gt;Critics of the dredging characterized the denial as a major stumbling block, but supporters said the Army Corps of Engineers, a federal agency, could proceed without Delaware&#039;s approval for the project. The dredging could create 13,000 jobs by keeping Delaware River ports competitive with others on the East Coast.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Philly Inquirer <a href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/20090725_Delaware_River_dredging_plan_hits_a_snag.html" rel="nofollow">talks to the multiple stakeholders</a> (mostly those in support of the dredging) and there is a consensus (of talking points at least) downplaying the Delaware decision and that they may not need Delaware&#8217;s approval to do this project:</p>
<blockquote><p>Critics of the dredging characterized the denial as a major stumbling block, but supporters said the Army Corps of Engineers, a federal agency, could proceed without Delaware&#8217;s approval for the project. The dredging could create 13,000 jobs by keeping Delaware River ports competitive with others on the East Coast.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

