<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Looking Glass.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:17:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-132186</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-132186</guid>
		<description>RWR,

No. This is about being anti-terrorism, and Scheuer is an admitted terrorist sympathizer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RWR,</p>
<p>No. This is about being anti-terrorism, and Scheuer is an admitted terrorist sympathizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhymes With Right</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131980</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhymes With Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131980</guid>
		<description>Eliminationist rhetoric on Delaware Liberal.  Tsk tsk tsk!

Do you folks need monitoring by DHS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eliminationist rhetoric on Delaware Liberal.  Tsk tsk tsk!</p>
<p>Do you folks need monitoring by DHS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonone</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131748</link>
		<dc:creator>anonone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131748</guid>
		<description>Dave wrote:

&lt;i&gt;As I remember it was an off topic (the post was defending President Obama’s right not to participate in some national day of prayer ceremonies while wishing that he would) anonymous comment which lacked original content, that attacked people’s faith on the national day of prayer.&lt;/i&gt;

No, Dave. It was a post of part of Mark Twain&#039;s &lt;i&gt;The War Prayer&lt;/i&gt; that was exactly on topic for a discussion of  National Prayer Day. 

So now we also know that you&#039;re more likely to censor posts from people using pseudonyms and/or that you perceive attack people’s faith. And you also forgot to mention that you wrote &quot;My condition is that the past disputes nor any disparagement based upon them not be continued here. &lt;b&gt;They will be deleted.&lt;/b&gt;  You have your own sites to say whatever you desire.&quot;

Nobody can trust what you write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave wrote:</p>
<p><i>As I remember it was an off topic (the post was defending President Obama’s right not to participate in some national day of prayer ceremonies while wishing that he would) anonymous comment which lacked original content, that attacked people’s faith on the national day of prayer.</i></p>
<p>No, Dave. It was a post of part of Mark Twain&#8217;s <i>The War Prayer</i> that was exactly on topic for a discussion of  National Prayer Day. </p>
<p>So now we also know that you&#8217;re more likely to censor posts from people using pseudonyms and/or that you perceive attack people’s faith. And you also forgot to mention that you wrote &#8220;My condition is that the past disputes nor any disparagement based upon them not be continued here. <b>They will be deleted.</b>  You have your own sites to say whatever you desire.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nobody can trust what you write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131738</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131738</guid>
		<description>You DVR Glen Beck&#039;s show daily and admitted it... you&#039;re right...  end of chat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You DVR Glen Beck&#8217;s show daily and admitted it&#8230; you&#8217;re right&#8230;  end of chat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican  David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131737</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican  David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131737</guid>
		<description>DG you will either believe the truth or you won&#039;t.  The man did an entire segment with a CIA analyst who was fretting that our leaders are not taking our security seriously enough.  He feared that people wouldn&#039;t wake up until we were attacked again.  That is not treason or hoping 200 million Americans die.  It is so far from reality that it deserves a clarification. MM is taking a clip then knowingly saying that the context is the exact opposite of what it was. 

I understand that you guys don&#039;t watch GB.  That is ok.  I DVR him every day.  I just  watched it early this morning.  I am just letting you know what he said.  I have the episode on hard drive.  If  I thought it mattered, I would send you a dvd.

I have nothing more to add to this thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DG you will either believe the truth or you won&#8217;t.  The man did an entire segment with a CIA analyst who was fretting that our leaders are not taking our security seriously enough.  He feared that people wouldn&#8217;t wake up until we were attacked again.  That is not treason or hoping 200 million Americans die.  It is so far from reality that it deserves a clarification. MM is taking a clip then knowingly saying that the context is the exact opposite of what it was. </p>
<p>I understand that you guys don&#8217;t watch GB.  That is ok.  I DVR him every day.  I just  watched it early this morning.  I am just letting you know what he said.  I have the episode on hard drive.  If  I thought it mattered, I would send you a dvd.</p>
<p>I have nothing more to add to this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican  David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131735</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican  David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131735</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry, you are more than welcome to drop by and comment.

As I remember it was an off topic (the post was defending President Obama&#039;s right not to participate in some national day of prayer ceremonies while wishing that he would)  anonymous comment which lacked original content,  that attacked people&#039;s faith on the national day of prayer.   I received a complaint and I just delayed the publication of it a few hours so that it would be published unedited when it was not the national day of prayer. 

 I will not touch any other contributor&#039;s posts.  I will not bother comments based upon them except under the standard posted.   I have no intention of censoring comments.  I have not in the past.  (Even with your Twain comment, it was only delayed 5 hours out of sensitivity.  Now if a name had been attached to comment it would have stayed where it was.)  I did not have the same regard for anonymous posts which lacked original content as those with names.  There is no ownership.  

The bottom line is that it was published without change and you have had scores of comments since then.   You are more than welcomed at any time to post comments and do so anonymously or to give a credited quote.  If you have more to add let&#039;s do it at DP.  DL would probably like to keep the thread about DL and its subjects.

Thanks guys for your indulgence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry, you are more than welcome to drop by and comment.</p>
<p>As I remember it was an off topic (the post was defending President Obama&#8217;s right not to participate in some national day of prayer ceremonies while wishing that he would)  anonymous comment which lacked original content,  that attacked people&#8217;s faith on the national day of prayer.   I received a complaint and I just delayed the publication of it a few hours so that it would be published unedited when it was not the national day of prayer. </p>
<p> I will not touch any other contributor&#8217;s posts.  I will not bother comments based upon them except under the standard posted.   I have no intention of censoring comments.  I have not in the past.  (Even with your Twain comment, it was only delayed 5 hours out of sensitivity.  Now if a name had been attached to comment it would have stayed where it was.)  I did not have the same regard for anonymous posts which lacked original content as those with names.  There is no ownership.  </p>
<p>The bottom line is that it was published without change and you have had scores of comments since then.   You are more than welcomed at any time to post comments and do so anonymously or to give a credited quote.  If you have more to add let&#8217;s do it at DP.  DL would probably like to keep the thread about DL and its subjects.</p>
<p>Thanks guys for your indulgence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131733</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131733</guid>
		<description>&quot;The problem is that you are saying that he is calling for an attack on America, when the segment was about how we avoid an attack on America. &quot;

So another attack makes us safer.  Sounds like battered wife syndrome.  I broke your jaw because I love you...

Look, we already invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and drones drop bombs in Pakistan almost daily, but apparently we are still &quot;under threat&quot;.  Think it through... stepping up the violence (what MS advocates) is assine.  And to say that another attack would basically assure we all get off our asses and fight is assine.

Protackian foolish... stop defending it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The problem is that you are saying that he is calling for an attack on America, when the segment was about how we avoid an attack on America. &#8221;</p>
<p>So another attack makes us safer.  Sounds like battered wife syndrome.  I broke your jaw because I love you&#8230;</p>
<p>Look, we already invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and drones drop bombs in Pakistan almost daily, but apparently we are still &#8220;under threat&#8221;.  Think it through&#8230; stepping up the violence (what MS advocates) is assine.  And to say that another attack would basically assure we all get off our asses and fight is assine.</p>
<p>Protackian foolish&#8230; stop defending it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonone</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131731</link>
		<dc:creator>anonone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131731</guid>
		<description>David,

As one who had an on-topic post temporarily removed by you because you did not believe that it was appropriate to be published on that day, you&#039;ll understand why I am skeptical. (You&#039;ll remember it was a totally non-profane non-defamatory quote of Mark Twain.)

But it is your blog; you can do whatever you want. The problem is that you probably will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>As one who had an on-topic post temporarily removed by you because you did not believe that it was appropriate to be published on that day, you&#8217;ll understand why I am skeptical. (You&#8217;ll remember it was a totally non-profane non-defamatory quote of Mark Twain.)</p>
<p>But it is your blog; you can do whatever you want. The problem is that you probably will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican  David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131730</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican  David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131730</guid>
		<description>Now guys, you say that it is a bad thing to defend Glen Beck.  The problem is that you are saying that he is calling for an attack on America, when the segment was about how we avoid an attack on America. 

 You can not even understand why Glen Beck who comes on at 5p and 2a beats most prime time cable programs and is third in popularity of all news programs if you don&#039;t get the true story.

You will go around thinking tens of millions of Americans are just waiting for the country to fall apart and be attacked then sweep through and establish a new regime like the Turner Diaries.   No wonder DD typed such paranoid dribble.  I don&#039;t know what the mm piece said that made you think that but even that clip doesn&#039;t say the former CIA guy wants an attack let alone Beck.

You can agree or most likely disagree with Beck, but let&#039;s have an honest discussion or you get the typical American situation where both sides just yell past each other thinking the other is crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now guys, you say that it is a bad thing to defend Glen Beck.  The problem is that you are saying that he is calling for an attack on America, when the segment was about how we avoid an attack on America. </p>
<p> You can not even understand why Glen Beck who comes on at 5p and 2a beats most prime time cable programs and is third in popularity of all news programs if you don&#8217;t get the true story.</p>
<p>You will go around thinking tens of millions of Americans are just waiting for the country to fall apart and be attacked then sweep through and establish a new regime like the Turner Diaries.   No wonder DD typed such paranoid dribble.  I don&#8217;t know what the mm piece said that made you think that but even that clip doesn&#8217;t say the former CIA guy wants an attack let alone Beck.</p>
<p>You can agree or most likely disagree with Beck, but let&#8217;s have an honest discussion or you get the typical American situation where both sides just yell past each other thinking the other is crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican  David</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131727</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican  David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131727</guid>
		<description>Do what you want anwhatever,  I will clarify to others who have not read the post that I will not be censoring anything.  If you drop the F bomb or something, you will see an F***.  If you say something that crosses the line of legal defamation, which is hard to do,  I am not going down with you.  That comment is gone, I am retaining legal counsel just to protect me if I am sued, but I have yet to see any comments on DP that reach that level.  

I am sure that DL would delete anything that opens them up to legal liability on that scale as well.  My only condition is be real.  That means you can tease, lampoon, disparage, or even be mean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do what you want anwhatever,  I will clarify to others who have not read the post that I will not be censoring anything.  If you drop the F bomb or something, you will see an F***.  If you say something that crosses the line of legal defamation, which is hard to do,  I am not going down with you.  That comment is gone, I am retaining legal counsel just to protect me if I am sued, but I have yet to see any comments on DP that reach that level.  </p>
<p>I am sure that DL would delete anything that opens them up to legal liability on that scale as well.  My only condition is be real.  That means you can tease, lampoon, disparage, or even be mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason330</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131725</link>
		<dc:creator>jason330</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131725</guid>
		<description>H.

That&#039;s the strategy that gave the country GWB.   How soon we forget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the strategy that gave the country GWB.   How soon we forget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonone</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131724</link>
		<dc:creator>anonone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131724</guid>
		<description>David A is an overt totalitarian who uses words like &quot;freedom&quot; and &quot;liberty&quot; only for their propaganda value in pushing his extremist anti-human rights, anti-free press, and money-over-people agenda. 

He has already announced that he will be censoring and editing comments at his discretion over at DelawarePolitics. His consistent and shameless dishonesty in his posts and comments virtually guarantee the demise of DelawarePolitics. 

I, for one, will be removing it from my bookmarks and I encourage others to do the same. If you do visit the site, be sure that you understand that what has been posted in the comments section may not be what the writer originally wrote and that whole comments may have been censored by removal altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David A is an overt totalitarian who uses words like &#8220;freedom&#8221; and &#8220;liberty&#8221; only for their propaganda value in pushing his extremist anti-human rights, anti-free press, and money-over-people agenda. </p>
<p>He has already announced that he will be censoring and editing comments at his discretion over at DelawarePolitics. His consistent and shameless dishonesty in his posts and comments virtually guarantee the demise of DelawarePolitics. </p>
<p>I, for one, will be removing it from my bookmarks and I encourage others to do the same. If you do visit the site, be sure that you understand that what has been posted in the comments section may not be what the writer originally wrote and that whole comments may have been censored by removal altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalgeek</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131723</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131723</guid>
		<description>New rule for Delaware Dem... 

If at the end of any post, someone is dead... edit it until they are alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New rule for Delaware Dem&#8230; </p>
<p>If at the end of any post, someone is dead&#8230; edit it until they are alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: h.</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131722</link>
		<dc:creator>h.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131722</guid>
		<description>If what Beck, Hannity,and Rush spew forth gets you that upset,  you&#039;re no better than those whackjobs that agree with them. Why can&#039;t you just shake your head and laugh like most people.

 Oh wait ..... you think Olbermann is &quot;teh shit&quot;. Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If what Beck, Hannity,and Rush spew forth gets you that upset,  you&#8217;re no better than those whackjobs that agree with them. Why can&#8217;t you just shake your head and laugh like most people.</p>
<p> Oh wait &#8230;.. you think Olbermann is &#8220;teh shit&#8221;. Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalgeek</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2009/07/01/the-looking-glass/#comment-131721</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=24275#comment-131721</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather just have him in prison for the rest of his life... better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather just have him in prison for the rest of his life&#8230; better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

