Comments on: If Stopping Abortion Is Really Your Goal…

By: callerRick

callerRick — Sat, 04 Jul 2009 12:05:16 +0000

“…since technique doesn’t seem to be his strong suit.”

That’s what you think. I’ve got a lot of references, if you’re interested.

By: pandora

pandora — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:06:29 +0000

Pulling out is also not very effective (approx. 27 out of every 100 result in pregnancy). But that shouldn’t bother callerRick since technique doesn’t seem to be his strong suit.

By: jason330

jason330 — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:39:38 +0000

Classy. You are a credit to the pro-life movement.

By: callerRick

callerRick — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:36:15 +0000

“Contraception is quite expensive, especially because many insurance companies don’t pay for it.”

Then pull-out and cum on her tits…problem solved.

By: Unstable Isotope

Unstable Isotope — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:14:07 +0000

Actually, PM, I think the anti-abortion movement gives men too much credit. Does anyone else find it suspicious that the part of the pregnancy the man is involved in is THE most important part. I would argue that there are many steps in a pregnancy and sperm + egg is just one of them.

By: Comment Rescue: David A. Proves My Point

Comment Rescue: David A. Proves My Point — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:32:08 +0000

[...] It’s about the sex [...]

By: Progressive Mom

Progressive Mom — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:24:14 +0000

“Personally, I would give a person a condom than let them have an abortion.”

Actually, Dave, the person wearing the condom and the person having the abortion are two different people.

But I give you credit — many Republicans don’t even notice that there are men involved in creating babies. You did notice that, right?

By: nemski

nemski — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:10:25 +0000

We have to return to GOD and His values.

Now I can guess whey GOP Dave keeps on coming back . . . he hopes to convert a few lost souls here.

By: pandora

pandora — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:58:32 +0000

Promiscuity?

Oh yeah, it’s all about the sex.

By: anonone

anonone — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:26:27 +0000

Dave, I really think you’d be happier in Iran where they are doing their best to “return to GOD and His values” like stoning gay people and other fun things.

If fits your whole lying, theocratic, totalitarian nature.

By: sillypoorperson

sillypoorperson — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:22:32 +0000

I speak for no one but myself.

really?

By: jason330

jason330 — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:19:56 +0000

We can’t be afraid of a little pragmatism when the stakes are a child’s life.

I speak for no one but myself.

Clearly. Because that last sentence put you at odds with your whole corrupt movement.

By: Republican David

Republican David — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:03:14 +0000

There is nothing inconsistent with reducing abortion and reducing promiscuity that leads to it.

That is the solution to lowering the rate of abortions. We have to return to GOD and His values.

Personally, I would give a person a condom than let them have an abortion. Some people are not going to listen to us. I would rather them at least keep an innocent child from being victimized. We can’t be afraid of a little pragmatism when the stakes are a child’s life.

I speak for no one but myself.

By: Dorian Gray

Dorian Gray — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:45:55 +0000

Great point XS. I didn’t know the Constitution required 100% agreement. If your religion dictates a certain thing… that’s really tough shit on you. Some people disagree with women’s suffage. So what?!?!

The Christian right… charging confidently into the 17th century!

By: xstryker

xstryker — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:03:25 +0000

you want the Federal Government to provide dollars for something some people don’t agree with at all

HOLD THE PHONE, GUYS, David’s getting dumber by the second! Remember that war in Iraq that we spent trillions on? The one David supported us spending trillions on? The one that none of us here agreed with?

Seriously, how does this guy type and breathe at the same time?