Delaware General Assembly Pre-Game Show-June, 23,2009

Filed in Delaware by on June 23, 2009

Presumably Dick Cathcart has spent the past four days reading all the fine print in the Governor’s budget proposal, and presumably he’ll be prepared to provide his Mindless Minions with their marching orders in Caucus today. Not a bad idea with only a week to go in the legislative session and an $800 million budgetary crater to fill. And no doubt the partisan hacks at ‘Lancaster Avenue’, as RSmitty likes to designate Rethug HQ, already have at least three press releases feigning outrage in the can, each one employing the phrase, ‘The Democrat Party‘.

While the budget showdown is obviously the focal point for the remainder of session, there’s a lot of key legislation moving through the legislature. Here’s what’s on tap for today:

Today’s Senate Agenda (Click here for full list):

SB 121(Sokola) is #1 on the Agenda and guaranteed to be #1 for entertainment value as well. Bob Venables, with his laughable amendments and his marble-mouthed Southern drawl, is once again sure to make an unintentional fool of himself.  Listen closely, b/c his ‘stream of consciousness’ style of talking off the top of his head can be pure comic gold. He is not really a mean-spirited person (Dr. Sigmund Somnambulo posits that the sacred and profane sides of Venables’ personality are constantly at war w/ each other), but there are times when he just can’t help himself. This will be one of those times. Best of all, the bill will pass, so there’ll be a happy ending for DL readers.

SB 106 and SB 173(Both McDowell) promote energy efficiency and enable counties and municipalities to become more energy-efficient as well. ‘Bulo is sure that Tommywonk has a much more sophisticated analysis on his site, so go there and root around. Based on the prime sponsors and co-sponsors, this is probably legislation that is strongly supported by the environmental community.

SB 80(Katz) creates a Delaware Health Care Consortium to create a statewide network so that medical facilities can  share patient records electronically.

Today’s House Agendas(Click here for full lists):

They’re working with three agendas now, so be on the lookout for mixing and matching. Anything on any of those agendas can in theory be brought up at any time. One reason for this is necessity. There are so many negotiations going on all over the building, especially with the ‘money’ committees, that often the House Majority Leader will be prepared to call on the sponsor of the next bill only to find that the sponsor is nowhere to be found. So, it’s not really intended to confuse, but it does from time to time.

And to make it more confusing, one is a House Consent Agenda. Now pay attention, kids, b/c El Somnambulo is only gonna explain this once. A Consent Agenda is an agenda with several bills on it, generally considered to be of a non-controversial nature. With the unanimous consent of the House, only one roll call is necessary to pass all the bills on the Consent Agenda. If even one member of the House requests that a bill be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered on its own, the bill is removed, no discussion needed. 

Let’s look at some highlights:

HB 185(B. Short) requires sponsors of scurrilous robo-calls daring to attack the integrity and honesty of political candidates to identify themselves at the beginning of the call. (As in, for illustrative purposes only, “This call questioning the sanity and pointing out the sexual deviancy of his opponent is proudly sponsored by Michael Protack, Official Leader of the Delaware Republican Party”). At least that’s one way to get his name out there. Although, to be fair, confusion could rear its head as in, “Oh, yeah, you’re Protack, the sexual deviancy guy.” Not that there’s anything wrong with that…

HB 198(D.E. Williams) would have Delaware ratify a national compact providing for the popular election of the President. ‘Bulo believes that this bill has been unduly maligned here, and he sees no reason why the person who receives the most votes for President, regardless of the breakdown of where they come from, should not be elected President. The Electoral College may be lots of fun for the stat heads, but electing a President who does not receive the most votes seems undemocratic.

Val Longhurst’s Manufactured Housing bills, previewed here last week, are back on the agenda. Bob Gilligan’s bill designed to prevent contractors from designating employees as ‘independent contractors’, also discussed last week, is on the agenda.

HB 199(Schooley) requires private insurers to cover recommended developmental screenings for toddlers and infants. The State Medicaid Program already pays for such screenings.

And, among the bills on House Consent Agenda E is the much-anticipated Strawberry as a State Fruit bill.  Shortcake for everyone in the Majority Caucus Room right after session if the bill passes! And Gerald Hocker’s already got his supplier on standby so that there’ll be plenty on hand for this weekend’s State Fruit Sellabration at both locations!

Tags:

About the Author ()

Comments (12)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. anon. says:

    Bulo, check out sussexcountian.com, there is letter to the editor from Hocker explaining how his name was assigned to the beer/wine grocery store bill. Still waiting for your explanation…..

  2. RSmitty says:

    Hey, anon.J, serious questions.

    If Del Pointe gets off the ground (although the news journal is reporting it is DOA for this session), what will be the race-type: thoroughbred or harness? What would be the racing season? Would it run in conjunction with Harrington, or with Dover Downs? If it’s thoroughbreds, then real competition then is with DPark, but at opposite ends, I don’t see a justification to complain.

  3. jason330 says:

    Bob Gilligan’s bill designed to prevent contractors from designating employees as ‘independent contractors’, also discussed last week, is on the agenda.

    Doesn’t Federal labor law prevail?

    PS> Sorry about stepping on this ES.

  4. I’m going to have my browser up so I can follow what happens with SB121.

  5. Anon with a period, a letter to the editor in the Sussex Countian is not the same as correcting the public record.

    He co-sponsored the bill, he got caught or realized he was stupid to have done so, and had his name removed.

    He should have just admitted he made a stupid mistake, and he would have been done with it.

    But when in doubt, throw the staff under the bus. Bulo’s been there and he’s seen people do that.

    He’s sure, however, that Hocker will make sure that there are some extra strawberries on that complimentary shortcake next time he sees you.

  6. FSP says:

    “Doesn’t Federal labor law prevail?”

    This bill is muy, muy shady. Check it out.

  7. cassandra_m says:

    As far as I can tell, Gilligan’s bill does not undermine the IRS rules for reclassification, but seems to define the role of the State agency in overseeing investigations and providing for fines, damages and other consequences for running afoul of the law. It prohibits retaliation against whistleblowers. Not much shady about that, I think.

  8. Joanne Christian says:

    SB80?–Honestly, some people soon forget the issues of privacy and ethics they were supposed to grow up and acquire. And where are all my HIV+, and DNA marker friends to fend this one off? Sometimes PHYSICAL extraction is your last firewall of defense in protecting your healthcare information. That push of a button to another agency may just have sealed your fate to acquiring health insurance, or getting treatment. And some clerical robot will be more than happy to move that job along. Having extracted files as a hospital admin.–I was the designated “releaser” in the middle of the night, for the “emergent” question. “Any allergies”, “last cardiac surgery”, “currently on blood thinners”…..but believe me, more often than not, an insurance company (and yes that was life and health called), with their official “could you tell me…or will you fax me…”. WATCH THIS ONE…the way the digital age is…the whole record goes from your 19yo STD clinic visit, your girlfriend’s abortion, the isolated barroom brawl you found yourself in, any drug testing not criminally aligned, genetic stuff, and consults, whether necessary or procedural. The discerning eye is gone and WHOOSH–off it goes to cyberland. Great, the penalties are AFTER the damage. Sorry, I’m OK w/ limited cyberflow–to me that means immunizations, and allergies. Prescriptions change all the time for some, to include that on a record greater than 6 months old is folly, and health insurance info., can be dealt with later. Fastest isn’t always the bestest gang. And most information there has NOTHING to do with what is needed.
    I will have to read this one more closely.

  9. anonone says:

    Has Thurman Adams ever been mistaken for Ed McMahon?

  10. RSmitty says:

    Steaksauce – tell that was unintentional with the news that is now making rounds about Adams.

  11. Joanne Christian says:

    No, but many a Delawarean wondered why did Thurman leave Johnny for Ruth Ann?