Comments on: On Gun Control http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/ Ground zero for all things political in Delaware Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:15:00 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: jason330 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-83014 jason330 Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:10:58 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-83014 That is interesting that you thought they had no substance. That is interesting that you thought they had no substance.

]]> By: mike w. http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-83011 mike w. Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:36:01 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-83011 hmmmm, so Jason, when's Anonone going to get hit with the ban stick or at least a good timeout? After all he did just break Delaware Liberal rules once again Jason - my point was that neither of your comments had any substance at all. Oh, and who did I just insult? Oh that's right, no one. hmmmm, so Jason, when’s Anonone going to get hit with the ban stick or at least a good timeout? After all he did just break Delaware Liberal rules once again

Jason – my point was that neither of your comments had any substance at all.

Oh, and who did I just insult? Oh that’s right, no one.

]]> By: anonone http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-83007 anonone Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:19:45 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-83007 Mike The Racist, Go away. Your racist, insulting, gun-loving crap isn't wanted here. Mike The Racist,

Go away. Your racist, insulting, gun-loving crap isn’t wanted here.

]]> By: jason330 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82998 jason330 Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:05:56 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82998 That's interesting that you thought my comment was nonsense. I hadn't thought of that since my logic and adherence to the Constitution is above reproach. That’s interesting that you thought my comment was nonsense.

I hadn’t thought of that since my logic and adherence to the Constitution is above reproach.

]]> By: mike w. http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82996 mike w. Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:51:21 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82996 Anonone - So start your own blog and ban whomever you like. This thread isn't about me, and it isn't about banning. Stay on topic. Jason - Do you have a point or argument to make or are you just being stupid with your nonsense comment? Anonone – So start your own blog and ban whomever you like. This thread isn’t about me, and it isn’t about banning. Stay on topic.

Jason – Do you have a point or argument to make or are you just being stupid with your nonsense comment?

]]> By: anonone http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82989 anonone Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:06:04 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82989 Mike the Racist, I am for banning you. Mike the Racist,

I am for banning you.

]]> By: jason330 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82987 jason330 Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:03:09 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82987 I'm a second amendment purists. People can own as many handmade guns as they want. You can have my handmade gun when you pry it out of my cold dead hand. Handmade guns don't kill people - people with mass produced guns kill people. I’m a second amendment purists. People can own as many handmade guns as they want.

You can have my handmade gun when you pry it out of my cold dead hand.

Handmade guns don’t kill people – people with mass produced guns kill people.

]]> By: mike w. http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82986 mike w. Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:59:49 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82986 so what's your opinion? Are "assault weapons" still evil and do they need to be banned? Are you with Nemski in calling for a nationwide ban on CCW based on well.........nothing but feelings? If we had no CCW would you be OK with myself and millions of others simply open carrying so you could see our guns? I really don't get Nemski's position there. There's no factual basis whatsoever by which to qualify why CCW should be banned. so what’s your opinion? Are “assault weapons” still evil and do they need to be banned?

Are you with Nemski in calling for a nationwide ban on CCW based on well………nothing but feelings? If we had no CCW would you be OK with myself and millions of others simply open carrying so you could see our guns?

I really don’t get Nemski’s position there. There’s no factual basis whatsoever by which to qualify why CCW should be banned.

]]> By: jason330 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82984 jason330 Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:53:50 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82984 Really? Super! Thanks! Really? Super! Thanks!

]]> By: mike w. http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82982 mike w. Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:52:07 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82982 just trying to educate you jason. It's always best not to be ignorant of the topic being discussed. just trying to educate you jason. It’s always best not to be ignorant of the topic being discussed.

]]> By: mike w. http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82980 mike w. Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:49:41 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82980 "I do thoroughly enjoy the fact that gun laws seem to somehow mean that people can’t own guns. It really amazes me the intellectual leap that is made with people on this topic." If a particular gun law bans a whole bunch of guns that I want to own (like say an assault weapons ban) then yes the laws are telling me I can't own guns. Telling me I can only buy certain guns but not others is like telling me I can publish an article in the newspaper but can't publish a blog post. Just because they close access to one medium while allowing the other doesn't mean they haven't infringed upon my rights. AWB's have nothing to do with the lethality of the weapons by the way. they also limit magazine capacity (which is just plain stupid) and ban guns used by my grandparents in WWII. “I do thoroughly enjoy the fact that gun laws seem to somehow mean that people can’t own guns. It really amazes me the intellectual leap that is made with people on this topic.”

If a particular gun law bans a whole bunch of guns that I want to own (like say an assault weapons ban) then yes the laws are telling me I can’t own guns.

Telling me I can only buy certain guns but not others is like telling me I can publish an article in the newspaper but can’t publish a blog post. Just because they close access to one medium while allowing the other doesn’t mean they haven’t infringed upon my rights.

AWB’s have nothing to do with the lethality of the weapons by the way. they also limit magazine capacity (which is just plain stupid) and ban guns used by my grandparents in WWII.

]]> By: jason330 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82978 jason330 Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:46:22 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82978 Really? Hmm....that's interesting. Really? Hmm….that’s interesting.

]]> By: mike w. http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-82976 mike w. Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:42:33 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-82976 "Tom S, in my mind, any gun that is semi-automatic and automatic should be considered an assault weapon." Semi-auto and auto? I take it you mean capable of either (I.E. select fire?) If so those are already "assault weapons" as they are capable of full auto firing. They're already tightly regulated under the 1934 NFA and are NOT used in crime. If you mean that you think any semi-auto weapon should be illegal.......you must be nuts. You really think only old revolvers and bolt-action rifles should be legal? Would you apply that to the police and tell them they can't carry a Glock, Sig (or any other modern pistol. That's the problem with you folks. You want to ban "assault weapons." yet you have no clue what said bans actually encompass and you're ignorant of what the term means. (it's a politically constructed term BTW) “Tom S, in my mind, any gun that is semi-automatic and automatic should be considered an assault weapon.”

Semi-auto and auto? I take it you mean capable of either (I.E. select fire?) If so those are already “assault weapons” as they are capable of full auto firing. They’re already tightly regulated under the 1934 NFA and are NOT used in crime.

If you mean that you think any semi-auto weapon should be illegal…….you must be nuts. You really think only old revolvers and bolt-action rifles should be legal? Would you apply that to the police and tell them they can’t carry a Glock, Sig (or any other modern pistol.

That’s the problem with you folks. You want to ban “assault weapons.” yet you have no clue what said bans actually encompass and you’re ignorant of what the term means. (it’s a politically constructed term BTW)

]]> By: Donhusseinsquishviti http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-80205 Donhusseinsquishviti Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:50:23 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-80205 <i>The gun had a good deal to do with the violence but I’d challenge you to find me a society where no guns are available. </i> THE RED HAT SOCIETY! HAH! The gun had a good deal to do with the violence but I’d challenge you to find me a society where no guns are available.

THE RED HAT SOCIETY!

HAH!

]]> By: nemski http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/11/30/about-gun-control/#comment-80193 nemski Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:15:23 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=8612#comment-80193 DV's been trying to ban me since Day One. DV’s been trying to ban me since Day One.

]]>