Comments on: Very odd, Andrew Sullivan has a request…

By: Joanne Christian

Joanne Christian — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:15:44 +0000

But I wonder if there’s a Donviti birth certificate listed?

By: Donsquishy

Donsquishy — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:45:17 +0000

lol

By: h.

h. — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:20:51 +0000

I think the baby is one of those Reborn dolls.

By: Von Cracker

Von Cracker — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 06:05:15 +0000

What claim am I making? I was only ripping the first 5 loony comments which were chock-full of righteous indignation….screaming ‘personal and private’…yeah right! Palin’s never misled anyone for political reasons and aspirations!

If you have an issue with it, take it up with The Atlantic. I’m sure Sullivan gets a few more hits than this joint (sorry fellas!). But all that DV did was to call-out Palin for not adhering to her own standard of transparency, even for the most trivial matters. That’s not, as you call it, intellectual cowardice (and yes, I googled it. It seems to be a favorite phrase of the Right…meaning it’s most likely a prominent affliction amongst the crowd).

But please forgive my lack of knowledge of new colloquial terms arising from the word ’stubborn’. Again, my bad.

“There you go. That didn’t hurt, did it?”

I bet you say that to all the boys.
.
.
.
.
.
And Melodius – relatively, you might be correct! But how do you know so much about my family? That’s so creepy.

By: Pooping Left Wing Troll

Pooping Left Wing Troll — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:08:47 +0000

I pooped on Sarah Palin once.

By: Melodius Funk

Melodius Funk — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:00:54 +0000

Go easy. VC is the retard in the family.

By: Miscreant

Miscreant — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:55:28 +0000

“and what the hell is an ‘intellectual coward’ anyway? two words that just sound good together? loser.

You need to read up, Sparky. Those words do have a certain intensity to them, especially when they’re used accurately, as in this case. Intellectual cowardice is subject to many interpretations depending on how it’s used. In this context, you are simultaneously putting forward a claim and refusing to stand by it by ridiculing, or in some case censoring, others who don’t share your flawed beliefs, coward.

There you go. That didn’t hurt, did it?

By: Gelatinous Monk

Gelatinous Monk — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:14:14 +0000

Just the way I like you Jason. In the gutter wetting yourself just to make a point.

I shall enjoy watching Obama disappoint you.

By: jason330

jason330 — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:10:35 +0000

If Mike W can make unsubstantiated statements and try to pass them off as fact, so can I.

By: Gelatinous Monk

Gelatinous Monk — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:08:59 +0000

“Yes they are.”

How, fat boy?

By: jason330

jason330 — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 02:07:36 +0000

Oh, and these medical records are in no way relevant to the campaign.

Yes they are.

By: Dominique

Dominique — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:46:51 +0000

Shout out to Jason for #72. That made me laugh.

By: pandora

pandora — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:34:59 +0000

Here, here! I’m not taking Sullivan into the fold, and I resent conservatives throwing him at us. As far as I’m concerned I’m free to use him as a tool, but beyond that he’s banished into political party limbo!

By: Unstable Isotope

Unstable Isotope — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:29:05 +0000

I don’t trust Andrew Sullivan. He’s the one who called people opposed to the Iraq War (hereby known as “the smart ones” and DFHs) a “fifth column.” He also published that filth of the The Bell Curve. He is not forgiven.

I guess I have to say that one of my pet peeves are Republicans who have “seen the light” long after everyone else has. Why do they deserve special credit. [end of rant]

By: jason330

jason330 — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:05:49 +0000

Words to live by.