<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Delaware Liberal Endorsements &#8211; Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:13:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Was A Willing Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-58246</link>
		<dc:creator>Was A Willing Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-58246</guid>
		<description>I will be sure to remind Karen about her obligations regarding the 5K. Mr. Miller or whomever you are, I have no doubt that stupid Liz Allens vicious attacks on your filing do&#039;s and don&#039;ts here and other places on the blogs have sent you into a rage. A justified rage. 
Please know that KHN hadn&#039;t knowledge of Ms. Allen&#039;s despicable behavior and certainly didn&#039;t condone it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will be sure to remind Karen about her obligations regarding the 5K. Mr. Miller or whomever you are, I have no doubt that stupid Liz Allens vicious attacks on your filing do&#8217;s and don&#8217;ts here and other places on the blogs have sent you into a rage. A justified rage.<br />
Please know that KHN hadn&#8217;t knowledge of Ms. Allen&#8217;s despicable behavior and certainly didn&#8217;t condone it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was A Willing Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-58244</link>
		<dc:creator>Was A Willing Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-58244</guid>
		<description>Well then, Karen ISN&#039;T Lying about Loretta&#039;s endorsement as this Mike Miller surrogate keeps proclaiming here and over on the WNJ web site and god knows where else. 
Karen doesn&#039;t have much staff and she is sharing her IT person with people who are using him for robo-calling etc. or I have no doubt that that clerical chore would have been performed already. 
I certainly will remove Walsh from any further listing I do. 
Loretta, I am sure that if anyone &#039;has something to say&#039; about your decision, it would ONLY be Liz Allen who would stoop to any level of recrimination. This is a primary year of no parallel and we all have to know our boundaries, keep our respect and pull the party together after Tuesday&#039;s results produce both victory and defeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then, Karen ISN&#8217;T Lying about Loretta&#8217;s endorsement as this Mike Miller surrogate keeps proclaiming here and over on the WNJ web site and god knows where else.<br />
Karen doesn&#8217;t have much staff and she is sharing her IT person with people who are using him for robo-calling etc. or I have no doubt that that clerical chore would have been performed already.<br />
I certainly will remove Walsh from any further listing I do.<br />
Loretta, I am sure that if anyone &#8216;has something to say&#8217; about your decision, it would ONLY be Liz Allen who would stoop to any level of recrimination. This is a primary year of no parallel and we all have to know our boundaries, keep our respect and pull the party together after Tuesday&#8217;s results produce both victory and defeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loretta Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-58237</link>
		<dc:creator>Loretta Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-58237</guid>
		<description>I have been very hesitant about joining any of this conversation.  I am not good at all about posting on blogs.  A friend of mine posts on this one and showed me how to get on and I have been following this for the last week.  At the beginning of this cycle I was willing to support Karen for a variety of reasons-one of the main being how some women are treated in my political party.  Along the way I heard Karen on the radio and her stand on off shore drilling and the exchange she had with Miller made me decide not to be in the group anymore.   I did speak to Mr. Northington and not only did I decide to support and vote for him because of his enviornmental stands, but also because of his early passion against Geroge Bush&#039;s war.  I told him that he could use my name as a supporter and stand by that.  I am not posting this to get a bunch of people calling me names or to debate any of the issues.  I am simply setting the record straight.  Even though some of us are elected and candidates does not mean we do not have the right to vote for whomever we feel will have a positive impact on not just my life but the future generations.  If Mr. Northington happens to get elected I really feel that would happen.  Thank you all for listening to me and as I stated say whatever you want but I will not respond.  This is a very personal decision and I will stand by it no matter what is said about me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been very hesitant about joining any of this conversation.  I am not good at all about posting on blogs.  A friend of mine posts on this one and showed me how to get on and I have been following this for the last week.  At the beginning of this cycle I was willing to support Karen for a variety of reasons-one of the main being how some women are treated in my political party.  Along the way I heard Karen on the radio and her stand on off shore drilling and the exchange she had with Miller made me decide not to be in the group anymore.   I did speak to Mr. Northington and not only did I decide to support and vote for him because of his enviornmental stands, but also because of his early passion against Geroge Bush&#8217;s war.  I told him that he could use my name as a supporter and stand by that.  I am not posting this to get a bunch of people calling me names or to debate any of the issues.  I am simply setting the record straight.  Even though some of us are elected and candidates does not mean we do not have the right to vote for whomever we feel will have a positive impact on not just my life but the future generations.  If Mr. Northington happens to get elected I really feel that would happen.  Thank you all for listening to me and as I stated say whatever you want but I will not respond.  This is a very personal decision and I will stand by it no matter what is said about me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobCooper</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57977</link>
		<dc:creator>BobCooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57977</guid>
		<description>Loretta Walsh did not endorse Karen --in fact, she endorsed Jerry Northington. Call Loretta and ask her.

Once again, Karen is claiming something that is simply not true.

If Karen has been working with a consultant, from DC or anywhere else, she failed to report it. If the guy is a professional and putting in time, then it is an in-kind contribution. If she paid him, it is an expense.  That means she has filed a false FEC report.

If she got a check for $5,000 yesterday she has 48 hours to report it under federal law --let&#039;s see if it shows up on her 48 hour report.

So, to recap:

Karen has failed to report her office space with Tom Gordon, either as an expense or in-kind donation.

Karen has failed to report her DC based consultant (who is apparently willing to donate his time and efforts ) either as an expense of in-kind donation.

Karen has filed an FEC report that is late and, claerly, incomplete.

Karen is obligated to file 48 hour report on a donation of $5,000 tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loretta Walsh did not endorse Karen &#8211;in fact, she endorsed Jerry Northington. Call Loretta and ask her.</p>
<p>Once again, Karen is claiming something that is simply not true.</p>
<p>If Karen has been working with a consultant, from DC or anywhere else, she failed to report it. If the guy is a professional and putting in time, then it is an in-kind contribution. If she paid him, it is an expense.  That means she has filed a false FEC report.</p>
<p>If she got a check for $5,000 yesterday she has 48 hours to report it under federal law &#8211;let&#8217;s see if it shows up on her 48 hour report.</p>
<p>So, to recap:</p>
<p>Karen has failed to report her office space with Tom Gordon, either as an expense or in-kind donation.</p>
<p>Karen has failed to report her DC based consultant (who is apparently willing to donate his time and efforts ) either as an expense of in-kind donation.</p>
<p>Karen has filed an FEC report that is late and, claerly, incomplete.</p>
<p>Karen is obligated to file 48 hour report on a donation of $5,000 tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was a Willing Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57971</link>
		<dc:creator>Was a Willing Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 16:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57971</guid>
		<description>Karen has the following endorsements:

Democratic Committees5th,8th,9th,16th,18th,21st,23rd,27th and 35th 
Elected Officials
Patricia M. Blevins, Margret Rose Henry, Hazel Plant, Helene M. Keeley,Dennis P. Williams, William J. Carson, John J. Viola, Theodore Gregory, Loretta Walsh, Charles Potter, Jr., Samuel Prado, Kevin F. Kelley, Sr., William E. Powers, Jr, John J. Cartier, Sheriff Mike Walsh
Organizations
(IBT) International Brotherhood of Teamsters(LIUNA) Laborers International Union of North America, Local 199(UA) United Association of Plumbing &amp; Pipefitting, Local 74(AFSCME) American Federation of State, County &amp; Municipal Employees(GCIU) Graphic Communications Union(UA) Road Sprinkler Fitters(ILA) International Longshoremen’s Association(CBTU) Coalition of Black Trade UnionistsYoung Democrats Movement

This is a GTVO crowd. The unions are going to be at every polling place on Tuesday with her signs and in November doing the same.

Are you kidding yourselves that Northington or Miller can get this kind of boots on the ground?

I do know that she got a union check for 5K yesterday, some of which is going to pay for her campaign manager, yes, the guy from DC who is working closely with the unions. 

We have to get some good DEMs in DC to help Obama-Biden and the real DEM workers are behind KHN. I do hope that Liz Allen hasn&#039;t destroyed completely the thread of reason that some of you progressives had that your vote will go the DEM in November.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karen has the following endorsements:</p>
<p>Democratic Committees5th,8th,9th,16th,18th,21st,23rd,27th and 35th<br />
Elected Officials<br />
Patricia M. Blevins, Margret Rose Henry, Hazel Plant, Helene M. Keeley,Dennis P. Williams, William J. Carson, John J. Viola, Theodore Gregory, Loretta Walsh, Charles Potter, Jr., Samuel Prado, Kevin F. Kelley, Sr., William E. Powers, Jr, John J. Cartier, Sheriff Mike Walsh<br />
Organizations<br />
(IBT) International Brotherhood of Teamsters(LIUNA) Laborers International Union of North America, Local 199(UA) United Association of Plumbing &amp; Pipefitting, Local 74(AFSCME) American Federation of State, County &amp; Municipal Employees(GCIU) Graphic Communications Union(UA) Road Sprinkler Fitters(ILA) International Longshoremen’s Association(CBTU) Coalition of Black Trade UnionistsYoung Democrats Movement</p>
<p>This is a GTVO crowd. The unions are going to be at every polling place on Tuesday with her signs and in November doing the same.</p>
<p>Are you kidding yourselves that Northington or Miller can get this kind of boots on the ground?</p>
<p>I do know that she got a union check for 5K yesterday, some of which is going to pay for her campaign manager, yes, the guy from DC who is working closely with the unions. </p>
<p>We have to get some good DEMs in DC to help Obama-Biden and the real DEM workers are behind KHN. I do hope that Liz Allen hasn&#8217;t destroyed completely the thread of reason that some of you progressives had that your vote will go the DEM in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Somnambulo</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57964</link>
		<dc:creator>El Somnambulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57964</guid>
		<description>El Somnambulo has a question. If Liz Allen is such a committed Democrat, how is it that her name is associated with the lawsuit challenging the legitimacy of Mike Protack&#039;s candidacy on the Independent Party line? The News-Journal story identifies her as an Independent Party member. 

Can she be a member of both parties in good standing, not to mention the COCOlocos? Is she trashing legitimate (whether one likes them or not) endorsements even though she can&#039;t even vote for Harpy-Nagle?

Or, to quote the Firesign Theatre, &quot;How can you be in two places at once when you&#039;re not anywhere at all?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Somnambulo has a question. If Liz Allen is such a committed Democrat, how is it that her name is associated with the lawsuit challenging the legitimacy of Mike Protack&#8217;s candidacy on the Independent Party line? The News-Journal story identifies her as an Independent Party member. </p>
<p>Can she be a member of both parties in good standing, not to mention the COCOlocos? Is she trashing legitimate (whether one likes them or not) endorsements even though she can&#8217;t even vote for Harpy-Nagle?</p>
<p>Or, to quote the Firesign Theatre, &#8220;How can you be in two places at once when you&#8217;re not anywhere at all?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobCooper</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57958</link>
		<dc:creator>BobCooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57958</guid>
		<description>It appears the Hartley-Nagle campaign has finally filed the pre-primary FEC disclosure. It is late, looks hastily prepared and raises more questions than it answers.

During the past few months, Karen  or her (now rebuked) surrogates have boasted that her campaign has:
-Raised $100,000 for the primary
-Commissioned polling that shows Karen &quot;has the numbers&quot; to win
-Hired a Washginton, DC, based campaign manager (who apparently submits Op-Ed pieces to the newspaper without the candidate&#039;s knowledge)

None of those expenses is listed on the most recent report, which you can find here:
http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00441600/360861/sb/ALL

Also, Karen made a big deal about opening her campaign office in Wilmington. This is a direct quote from her website:

&quot;Wilmington, Delaware - On Thursday evening the Hartley-Nagle for Congress Campaign kicked off the Grand Opening of its campaign office located on the Wilmington Riverfront, 964 Justison Street.&quot;

You can find the entire news release here: 
http://www.hartley-nagle.com/news.php
Just scroll down to August 15th.

Karen is sharing office space with Tom Gordon --if Gordon is paying for it, and allowing the Hartely-Nagle campaign to use the space; that is an in-kind contribution. If she is paying for the space, it is a campaign expense.

In either case, the office space should be listed on her FEC pre-primary disclosure report either as a donation or as an expense. It is not listed.

The simple fact is, the Hartley-Nagle campaign has not been truthful, either with the voters of Delaware, the FEC or both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears the Hartley-Nagle campaign has finally filed the pre-primary FEC disclosure. It is late, looks hastily prepared and raises more questions than it answers.</p>
<p>During the past few months, Karen  or her (now rebuked) surrogates have boasted that her campaign has:<br />
-Raised $100,000 for the primary<br />
-Commissioned polling that shows Karen &#8220;has the numbers&#8221; to win<br />
-Hired a Washginton, DC, based campaign manager (who apparently submits Op-Ed pieces to the newspaper without the candidate&#8217;s knowledge)</p>
<p>None of those expenses is listed on the most recent report, which you can find here:<br />
<a href="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00441600/360861/sb/ALL" rel="nofollow">http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/dcdev/forms/C00441600/360861/sb/ALL</a></p>
<p>Also, Karen made a big deal about opening her campaign office in Wilmington. This is a direct quote from her website:</p>
<p>&#8220;Wilmington, Delaware &#8211; On Thursday evening the Hartley-Nagle for Congress Campaign kicked off the Grand Opening of its campaign office located on the Wilmington Riverfront, 964 Justison Street.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can find the entire news release here:<br />
<a href="http://www.hartley-nagle.com/news.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.hartley-nagle.com/news.php</a><br />
Just scroll down to August 15th.</p>
<p>Karen is sharing office space with Tom Gordon &#8211;if Gordon is paying for it, and allowing the Hartely-Nagle campaign to use the space; that is an in-kind contribution. If she is paying for the space, it is a campaign expense.</p>
<p>In either case, the office space should be listed on her FEC pre-primary disclosure report either as a donation or as an expense. It is not listed.</p>
<p>The simple fact is, the Hartley-Nagle campaign has not been truthful, either with the voters of Delaware, the FEC or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBaumbach</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57944</link>
		<dc:creator>PBaumbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57944</guid>
		<description>I am pleased that KHN has submitted her pre-primary financial report, covering the period from 6/30 to 8/20/08.

Summary
KHN had $4,555 of individual contributions, $1,403 from Michael Dore, and over $3,000 too small to itemize.  On 8/20/08 her campaign had negative $300 in the bank, and owes $2,475 to KHN.  She certainly sounds well-positioned to take on Castle.

Jerry had $20,759 of individual contributions (4.55 times as much as KHN during the same period), $11,050 from 16 designated individuals, and $9,709 from smaller contributors.  On 8/20/08, his campaign had over $8,000 in the bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pleased that KHN has submitted her pre-primary financial report, covering the period from 6/30 to 8/20/08.</p>
<p>Summary<br />
KHN had $4,555 of individual contributions, $1,403 from Michael Dore, and over $3,000 too small to itemize.  On 8/20/08 her campaign had negative $300 in the bank, and owes $2,475 to KHN.  She certainly sounds well-positioned to take on Castle.</p>
<p>Jerry had $20,759 of individual contributions (4.55 times as much as KHN during the same period), $11,050 from 16 designated individuals, and $9,709 from smaller contributors.  On 8/20/08, his campaign had over $8,000 in the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was a Willing Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57923</link>
		<dc:creator>Was a Willing Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57923</guid>
		<description>I am extremely disappointed in the gutter tactics that Liz is resorting to, on behalf of KHN.
*
Well said Paul and ditto the sentiment. KHN had no idea of what has been going on and needless to say was HORRIFIED to stumble onto these threads yesterday. 
UNREAL.
Now Liz is targeting me and I say bring it on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am extremely disappointed in the gutter tactics that Liz is resorting to, on behalf of KHN.<br />
*<br />
Well said Paul and ditto the sentiment. KHN had no idea of what has been going on and needless to say was HORRIFIED to stumble onto these threads yesterday.<br />
UNREAL.<br />
Now Liz is targeting me and I say bring it on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was a Willing Blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57922</link>
		<dc:creator>Was a Willing Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57922</guid>
		<description>Holy God, Liz Allen has taken her low-rent self into a spitting contest with a Mike Miller surrogate while impugning all sorts of complete BULL about Northington.

As if that does KHN some good.

KHN rejects every scrap of what Liz is representing here per many conversations with her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy God, Liz Allen has taken her low-rent self into a spitting contest with a Mike Miller surrogate while impugning all sorts of complete BULL about Northington.</p>
<p>As if that does KHN some good.</p>
<p>KHN rejects every scrap of what Liz is representing here per many conversations with her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobCooper</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57867</link>
		<dc:creator>BobCooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57867</guid>
		<description>Re: Filings: Karen’s report is not due until today.
Liz Allen wrote:

&quot;The reporting period ended Aug. 20. That is not when the report is due.

It would be nice if you knew what you were talking about. Karen was on the phone yesterday, she has filed everything properly.&quot;

Karen Hartley-Nagle missed the filing deadline for the pre-primary FEC report. And even if Liz&#039;s version was correct, which it is not, Karen missed the &quot;deadline&quot; on the 5th.

On the 28th, the FEC sent Michael Dore (Karen&#039;s  campaign manager?) a letter notifying her that she had missed a deadline. On September 5th, it hit this blog that Karen had missed the deadline. Still no filing.

So, the question is why? Why would a candidate who claims to be dedicated to ensuring open government miss such an important deadline? Why would a candidate who trumpets her experience in running for congress as a reason for voters to back her miss such an important deadline?

It does not seem likely that she just forgot.

Based on her self professed experience, it does not seem likely that she did not know.

So, the logical answer to &#039;why?&#039; is that Karen is hiding something.

Karen publicly stated that she had raised a hundred thousand dollars for the primary.  Maybe she didn&#039;t.

Karen&#039;s surrogates have publicly stated that she has a DC based campaign manger (who would have to be paid). Maybe she doesn&#039;t.

Karen has tried to create a political band wagon effect by claiming she has polling data that shows she is ahead in this primary race. Polling is expensive and must be paid for in advance. Maybe she hasn&#039;t.

Karen has office space, signs and other campaign expenses --and maybe she would rather not admit she doesn&#039;t have the money to pay for them.

Of course, much of this is speculation.

Karen (or one of her minions) can easily put this to rest by listing her expenses and campaign income here.

Or, even better, file the required federal disclosure form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Filings: Karen’s report is not due until today.<br />
Liz Allen wrote:</p>
<p>&#8220;The reporting period ended Aug. 20. That is not when the report is due.</p>
<p>It would be nice if you knew what you were talking about. Karen was on the phone yesterday, she has filed everything properly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Karen Hartley-Nagle missed the filing deadline for the pre-primary FEC report. And even if Liz&#8217;s version was correct, which it is not, Karen missed the &#8220;deadline&#8221; on the 5th.</p>
<p>On the 28th, the FEC sent Michael Dore (Karen&#8217;s  campaign manager?) a letter notifying her that she had missed a deadline. On September 5th, it hit this blog that Karen had missed the deadline. Still no filing.</p>
<p>So, the question is why? Why would a candidate who claims to be dedicated to ensuring open government miss such an important deadline? Why would a candidate who trumpets her experience in running for congress as a reason for voters to back her miss such an important deadline?</p>
<p>It does not seem likely that she just forgot.</p>
<p>Based on her self professed experience, it does not seem likely that she did not know.</p>
<p>So, the logical answer to &#8216;why?&#8217; is that Karen is hiding something.</p>
<p>Karen publicly stated that she had raised a hundred thousand dollars for the primary.  Maybe she didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Karen&#8217;s surrogates have publicly stated that she has a DC based campaign manger (who would have to be paid). Maybe she doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Karen has tried to create a political band wagon effect by claiming she has polling data that shows she is ahead in this primary race. Polling is expensive and must be paid for in advance. Maybe she hasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Karen has office space, signs and other campaign expenses &#8211;and maybe she would rather not admit she doesn&#8217;t have the money to pay for them.</p>
<p>Of course, much of this is speculation.</p>
<p>Karen (or one of her minions) can easily put this to rest by listing her expenses and campaign income here.</p>
<p>Or, even better, file the required federal disclosure form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBaumbach</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57458</link>
		<dc:creator>PBaumbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57458</guid>
		<description>As a member of the PDD endorsement committee, I can report that when we interviewed Jerry Northington, I specifically asked him what skelatons he had in his closet.  I asked this question, for he initially appeared &#039;too good to be true&#039;.  He was very forthright in sharing them.

I appreciated Jerry&#039;s candor on this personal matter.

I (and my fellow committee members appeared to have) decided that it should not affect his candidacy, although it could open him up to smears and intimidation, if his opponents are desperate and low enough.  He confirmed that he is prepared, if he is called on any such personal issues, that the race is too important to cave under such intimidation.

So Liz is again proven to be wrong (the pattern continues).  Before endorsing Jerry Northington, the PDD endorsement committee DID ask Jerry Northington &#039;what he&#039;s hiding&#039;.

I am extremely disappointed in the gutter tactics that Liz is resorting to, on behalf of KHN.

I applaud DL&#039;s endorsement of Jerry Northington, and in DL&#039;s standing up against the relentless and baseless attacks by Liz (in contrast, she is making Mike&#039;s gun rants seem almost rational!)


As a final and different note, if (and I have no way to judge) posters such as Nancy and Liz and others have had regular difficulty recently in submitting posts to DL, then I do very much regret this situation, and appreciate their perseverance, and their efforts to continue to post, through necessary pseudonyms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a member of the PDD endorsement committee, I can report that when we interviewed Jerry Northington, I specifically asked him what skelatons he had in his closet.  I asked this question, for he initially appeared &#8216;too good to be true&#8217;.  He was very forthright in sharing them.</p>
<p>I appreciated Jerry&#8217;s candor on this personal matter.</p>
<p>I (and my fellow committee members appeared to have) decided that it should not affect his candidacy, although it could open him up to smears and intimidation, if his opponents are desperate and low enough.  He confirmed that he is prepared, if he is called on any such personal issues, that the race is too important to cave under such intimidation.</p>
<p>So Liz is again proven to be wrong (the pattern continues).  Before endorsing Jerry Northington, the PDD endorsement committee DID ask Jerry Northington &#8216;what he&#8217;s hiding&#8217;.</p>
<p>I am extremely disappointed in the gutter tactics that Liz is resorting to, on behalf of KHN.</p>
<p>I applaud DL&#8217;s endorsement of Jerry Northington, and in DL&#8217;s standing up against the relentless and baseless attacks by Liz (in contrast, she is making Mike&#8217;s gun rants seem almost rational!)</p>
<p>As a final and different note, if (and I have no way to judge) posters such as Nancy and Liz and others have had regular difficulty recently in submitting posts to DL, then I do very much regret this situation, and appreciate their perseverance, and their efforts to continue to post, through necessary pseudonyms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57421</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57421</guid>
		<description>Liz,

KHN did, in fact, miss a filing deadline with the FEC.  It is the pre-primary report and covers the period of 7/1 - 8/20.  It was due on 8/20. on the 29th, the FEC send Karen a &quot;Notice of Failure to File,&quot; reference number C00441600. 

It is on the FEC site, but you have to do a serach for KHN&#039;s name and they you will find it.

The Notice of Failure to File&#039;s first paragraph reads: 

&quot;It has come to the attention of the Federal Election Commission that you may have failed to file the above referenced report as receipts and expenditures as required by the Federal Election Campaign Act, as amended.&quot;

The letter was sent to Michael R. Dore. 

It forther states that the campaign has 4 days from the date from the date of the notice to file. So, with the extension, that would have been the 2nd. Today is the 5th and still no report.

The reason it&#039;s significant is that Karen talks about her experience running as a reason people should vote for her. She also talks a lot about open government, something we all believe in. The fact is, experienced, open government candidates don&#039;t miss FEC deadlines.

Anyone can verify this by going to the FEC website clicking on the US Map on the right, then clicking on delaware and typing Hartley in the box that asks for the partial name of the candidate or committee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p>KHN did, in fact, miss a filing deadline with the FEC.  It is the pre-primary report and covers the period of 7/1 &#8211; 8/20.  It was due on 8/20. on the 29th, the FEC send Karen a &#8220;Notice of Failure to File,&#8221; reference number C00441600. </p>
<p>It is on the FEC site, but you have to do a serach for KHN&#8217;s name and they you will find it.</p>
<p>The Notice of Failure to File&#8217;s first paragraph reads: </p>
<p>&#8220;It has come to the attention of the Federal Election Commission that you may have failed to file the above referenced report as receipts and expenditures as required by the Federal Election Campaign Act, as amended.&#8221;</p>
<p>The letter was sent to Michael R. Dore. </p>
<p>It forther states that the campaign has 4 days from the date from the date of the notice to file. So, with the extension, that would have been the 2nd. Today is the 5th and still no report.</p>
<p>The reason it&#8217;s significant is that Karen talks about her experience running as a reason people should vote for her. She also talks a lot about open government, something we all believe in. The fact is, experienced, open government candidates don&#8217;t miss FEC deadlines.</p>
<p>Anyone can verify this by going to the FEC website clicking on the US Map on the right, then clicking on delaware and typing Hartley in the box that asks for the partial name of the candidate or committee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz allen</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57417</link>
		<dc:creator>liz allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57417</guid>
		<description>Jason: did you talk to Jerry yet? What are you waiting for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason: did you talk to Jerry yet? What are you waiting for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz allen</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/04/delaware-liberal-endorsements-part-4/#comment-57415</link>
		<dc:creator>liz allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6239#comment-57415</guid>
		<description>Mike: thanks for all your attempts to rectify the situation which Jason would like everyone to believe (after the fact) never happened. 

I am sure you think there was no conspiracy here, but facts are facts.

Susan Collins, Nancy and I were blocked, and who is speaking out against the Coons Goons, and who is supporting Karen...no conspiracy perhaps, but a major coincidence at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: thanks for all your attempts to rectify the situation which Jason would like everyone to believe (after the fact) never happened. </p>
<p>I am sure you think there was no conspiracy here, but facts are facts.</p>
<p>Susan Collins, Nancy and I were blocked, and who is speaking out against the Coons Goons, and who is supporting Karen&#8230;no conspiracy perhaps, but a major coincidence at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
