<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama hits 50%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:14:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookem</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56357</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56357</guid>
		<description>This is great news. . .if the election is tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great news. . .if the election is tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Loudell</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56288</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Loudell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56288</guid>
		<description>Points taken.

But I stress - except for the last one - Zogby&#039;s interactive polls have tended to favor Obama more than his telephone polls.

Allan Loudell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Points taken.</p>
<p>But I stress &#8211; except for the last one &#8211; Zogby&#8217;s interactive polls have tended to favor Obama more than his telephone polls.</p>
<p>Allan Loudell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delawaredem</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56284</link>
		<dc:creator>delawaredem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56284</guid>
		<description>Allan...

There are two Zogby polls.  The ones in the primaries that you refer to were not interactive online polls.   They were the standard phone call polls.   The one showing McCain up is an online poll, which are universally thought to be crap.  Indeed, our online polls here at DL probably are just as trustworthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan&#8230;</p>
<p>There are two Zogby polls.  The ones in the primaries that you refer to were not interactive online polls.   They were the standard phone call polls.   The one showing McCain up is an online poll, which are universally thought to be crap.  Indeed, our online polls here at DL probably are just as trustworthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Loudell</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56273</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Loudell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56273</guid>
		<description>To all,

At the risk of wading into this controversy, have you all forgotten that Zogby&#039;s polls tended to FAVOR Obama during the primaries and caucuses, compared to other polls, and Zogby often beat the others?

The one time Zogby blew it big was California, where he projected Obama doing much better.

Zogby nailed the outcome in North Carolina.

The point is---I find it interesting if a pollster whose methodology tended to favor Obama during the Primary/Caucus season then produces a poll where the race is razor-thin and/or McCain is actually ahead.

I agree the Interactive polls shouldn&#039;t be taken as seriously as the regular telephone polls, but , Zogby does try to take demographic data into account when &#039;weighting&#039; the numbers, as I understand it.   (I&#039;ll have to check on this again!)

But the point is... the Interactive polls have often favored Obama more than the telephone polls by a whisker, and my theory is that simply reflects that Obama supporters - in general - are more technologically savvy.  When I brought that up to Zogby the other day, he couldn&#039;t disagree.

I DO go to Zogby more often for the above reasons, plus I know him better - met him in Wilmington some years ago - and I do have full permission to reproduce on my blog as much as I want.

This doesn&#039;t mean I discount the other pollsters.  Quite to the contrary.  I just posted on my blog the latest CBS News poll AND the latest Gallup daily tracking poll.  I generally see day-to-day tracking polls as the most unreliable, but - of course - you can get trends.  

And in this case, it IS psychologically significant that Senator Obama met the 50 percent threshold for the first time in the Gallup daily tracking poll.

With an uptick from 49 to 50 percent, that IS statistically insignificant, but still carries that psychological landmark, as I noted above.

Lest we forget, Jimmy Carter beat Gerald Ford in 1976 with 50.1 %... the last time the Democrats won a majority!

Allan Loudell
WDEL Radio &amp; www.wdel.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all,</p>
<p>At the risk of wading into this controversy, have you all forgotten that Zogby&#8217;s polls tended to FAVOR Obama during the primaries and caucuses, compared to other polls, and Zogby often beat the others?</p>
<p>The one time Zogby blew it big was California, where he projected Obama doing much better.</p>
<p>Zogby nailed the outcome in North Carolina.</p>
<p>The point is&#8212;I find it interesting if a pollster whose methodology tended to favor Obama during the Primary/Caucus season then produces a poll where the race is razor-thin and/or McCain is actually ahead.</p>
<p>I agree the Interactive polls shouldn&#8217;t be taken as seriously as the regular telephone polls, but , Zogby does try to take demographic data into account when &#8216;weighting&#8217; the numbers, as I understand it.   (I&#8217;ll have to check on this again!)</p>
<p>But the point is&#8230; the Interactive polls have often favored Obama more than the telephone polls by a whisker, and my theory is that simply reflects that Obama supporters &#8211; in general &#8211; are more technologically savvy.  When I brought that up to Zogby the other day, he couldn&#8217;t disagree.</p>
<p>I DO go to Zogby more often for the above reasons, plus I know him better &#8211; met him in Wilmington some years ago &#8211; and I do have full permission to reproduce on my blog as much as I want.</p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t mean I discount the other pollsters.  Quite to the contrary.  I just posted on my blog the latest CBS News poll AND the latest Gallup daily tracking poll.  I generally see day-to-day tracking polls as the most unreliable, but &#8211; of course &#8211; you can get trends.  </p>
<p>And in this case, it IS psychologically significant that Senator Obama met the 50 percent threshold for the first time in the Gallup daily tracking poll.</p>
<p>With an uptick from 49 to 50 percent, that IS statistically insignificant, but still carries that psychological landmark, as I noted above.</p>
<p>Lest we forget, Jimmy Carter beat Gerald Ford in 1976 with 50.1 %&#8230; the last time the Democrats won a majority!</p>
<p>Allan Loudell<br />
WDEL Radio &amp; <a href="http://www.wdel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wdel.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnnyX</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56235</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnnyX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56235</guid>
		<description>Holy crap, DPN, the &quot;milf to gilf&quot; line is the funniest thing I&#039;ve read today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap, DPN, the &#8220;milf to gilf&#8221; line is the funniest thing I&#8217;ve read today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56225</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 20:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56225</guid>
		<description>BHO is 51% in Rasmussen.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BHO is 51% in Rasmussen.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll" rel="nofollow">http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Von Cracker</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56221</link>
		<dc:creator>Von Cracker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56221</guid>
		<description>The Zogby poll was an unscientific Interactive poll.  So when comparing methodology, yes, the ZI poll is not real – as in accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zogby poll was an unscientific Interactive poll.  So when comparing methodology, yes, the ZI poll is not real – as in accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56210</link>
		<dc:creator>pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56210</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not that into polls, but this one seemed worth mentioning.

BTW, I would have pointed out (and still will) if McCain hits 50%... if I can type through the tears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not that into polls, but this one seemed worth mentioning.</p>
<p>BTW, I would have pointed out (and still will) if McCain hits 50%&#8230; if I can type through the tears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike w.</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56206</link>
		<dc:creator>mike w.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56206</guid>
		<description>Jason - I forgot, any poll numbers (or stats in general) that you disagree with are to be disregarded as &quot;not real.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason &#8211; I forgot, any poll numbers (or stats in general) that you disagree with are to be disregarded as &#8220;not real.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmitty</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56205</link>
		<dc:creator>rsmitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56205</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Loudell needs to get his head out of his ass. He keeps quoting the partisan ZOGBY poll numbers as if they are real.&lt;/i&gt;  

I think he should use the DELib poll instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Loudell needs to get his head out of his ass. He keeps quoting the partisan ZOGBY poll numbers as if they are real.</i>  </p>
<p>I think he should use the DELib poll instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason330</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56202</link>
		<dc:creator>jason330</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56202</guid>
		<description>Gallup daily tracking poll is a blight - but it is better than that stupid ZOGBY poll that Allan Loudell is in love with.  

Loudell needs to get his head out of his ass.  He keeps quoting the partisan ZOGBY poll numbers as if they are real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gallup daily tracking poll is a blight &#8211; but it is better than that stupid ZOGBY poll that Allan Loudell is in love with.  </p>
<p>Loudell needs to get his head out of his ass.  He keeps quoting the partisan ZOGBY poll numbers as if they are real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DPN</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/09/02/obama-hits-50/#comment-56199</link>
		<dc:creator>DPN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=6216#comment-56199</guid>
		<description>Palin going from MILF to GILF in 4 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin going from MILF to GILF in 4 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

