We here at Delaware Liberal from thist day forward do hereby submit to you ,the readers, the official Delaware Liberas Seal of Experience or Seal of No Experience. It is our sound judgement and sole opinion that we reserve the right to deem you worthy of giving a credible response to our posts or not. Do not ask us what experience is, we know what it is and will tell you as we go. We know what it is not. So, when we disagree with you, mostly like that will be something that shows a lack of experience and hence forth the Seal of No Experience will be awarded. Exampleswhere the Seal of No Experience will be dispensed will definitely be age, gender, race, level of fitness, plaeces travelled, partner, sexual orientation, schooling, military service and lenght of service in Congress. If we doist christen you experienced then thoust may comment hitherto and never be disagreed with. If not, we will call you names, buy amusing props to poke fun at your ideas with and possibly label you with names other than that of presidential derivatives.
starting thusly!
So it is done!
20 responses so far ↓
1 mike w. // Aug 6, 2008 at 9:31 pm
Trying to regain your echo chamber huh?
Aww, you’ve created a whole new ad hominem attack. That fits well with the type of “debate” you’ve engaged in thus far. You’ve decreed that you’ll pull the “lack of experience” card, without qualification, anytime you’re unable to rationally engage in debate and refute arguments.
Such a child DTB.
2 Delaware's Brilliantest Blogger // Aug 6, 2008 at 9:36 pm
THOUST IS AWARDED THE SEAL OF NO EXPERIENCE! THE USE OF AD-HOMINEM IN A RESPONSE HAS PROVIDED YOU THIS HIDEOUS BADGE!
3 mike w. // Aug 6, 2008 at 9:39 pm
Awesome, the use of all caps makes me cower in your presence oh omnipotent one….
4 Rebecca // Aug 6, 2008 at 9:44 pm
A good night’s sleep might help! ;o)
5 miscreant // Aug 6, 2008 at 9:44 pm
Soooo… you’re merely formalizing what is already happening? People with dissenting views, who find it necessary to stoop to your intellectual level to get them across, will be subject to ridicule? Those who cause one of the weak links in this throbbing socialist daisy chain to lose concentration will be singled out and labeled?
Radical!
6 mike w. // Aug 6, 2008 at 9:46 pm
Miscreant - And here I’ve been told all my life that liberals are the ones who are inclusive, compassionate, tolerant, and open to discourse……. experience has shown me otherwise and exposed their hypocrisy.
Hell, the Brady Campaign to stop gun violence used to have a blog. They 1st “moderated” them to quell pro-gun dissent and then shut off comments entirely because they couldn’t have comments that tore their propaganda and lies to shreds.
7 miscreant // Aug 6, 2008 at 9:48 pm
Yep, I suppose it’s only a matter of time before the corksuckers censor me.
8 Delaware's Brilliantest Blogger // Aug 6, 2008 at 9:54 pm
MISCREANT,
YOU GET NOTHING! YOU MERELY COMMENTED IN THE HOPES THAT I WOULD GIVE YOU THE SEAL!
I AM SMARTER THAN YOU
(INSERT ECHO…YOU, YOU, YOU)
9 mike w. // Aug 6, 2008 at 10:01 pm
“I AM SMARTER THAN YOU”
Keep telling yourself that. If you repeat it long enough it might just come true.
10 miscreant // Aug 6, 2008 at 10:03 pm
Shyte! I guess I’m going to have to try harder to earn that badge.
11 Delaware's Brilliantest Blogger // Aug 6, 2008 at 10:05 pm
YES YOU WILL, WILL, WILL, will
will
wi
l
l
12 mike w. // Aug 6, 2008 at 10:07 pm
You know DTB, based on your posts & comments the causal observer would certainly assume you were young & inexperienced.
13 Gflat dim // Aug 6, 2008 at 10:19 pm
or drunk
14 mike w. // Aug 6, 2008 at 10:56 pm
Sadly no. This is normal for him.
15 Pandora // Aug 6, 2008 at 11:09 pm
So speaks the expert who supports the war in Iraq without the slightest idea of what the history of Iraq is!
16 Delaware's Brilliantest Blogger // Aug 7, 2008 at 7:23 am
THOUST IS GIVEN THE SEAL OF EXPERIENCE! FOR PWNED A TROLL WITH THE IMPLIED KNOWLEDGE OF IRAQ’S HISTORY
17 mike w. // Aug 7, 2008 at 7:54 am
Pandora said,
“Mike’s uninformed answer: “It’s a meaningless question. Where are the christians? Probably being persecuted because they’re of a different religion than most Iraqi’s.”
Ummm… wrong. But… wait… Mike discovered google, and ,’lo and behold, his answer changes to : “OK, so Saddam didn’t persecute Christians”
Pandora as usual isn’t too quick. Iraq under Saddam and Iraq now are two fundamentally different countries. Saddam and his ruling party were Sunni (the minority in Iraq) and he repressed the Shia majority. The Shia are also the majority in Iran.
And as I said before, Saddam didn’t persecute Christians, but he did other groups in Iraq. What does the fact that Christians were spared have to do with ANYTHING?
And Pandora, you are hardly an authority on the history of Iraq……
18 mike w. // Aug 7, 2008 at 1:01 pm
DTB speaks of “implied knowledge” but remains willfully ignorant when pressed with cold, hard facts, especially on guns/gun control.
How’s gun control working out for Obama’s hometown of Chicago? Why it’s a shining sucess……haha
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/70593
19 mike w. // Aug 7, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Miscreant - RE comment #5. It seems quite “progressive” of them doesn’t it, in a socialist / communist kind of way?
20 mike w. // Aug 8, 2008 at 2:47 pm
“People with dissenting views, who find it necessary to stoop to your intellectual level to get them across, will be subject to ridicule?”
What other choice does DTB have? He’s clearly not up to snuff on an intellectual level, becuase if he were he’d be using the 3 most effective tools of debate; reason, logic, and facts. The fact that he engages dissenters in the manner he does only further invalidates anything he has to say.
When ridicule is all you’ve got, why not create an exclusionary labeling system? Even better, create one aimed at discouraging dissent and streamlining the process through which to ridicule those with whom you are unable to debate on an intellectual level?
The sad thing is DTB thinks his system is actually clever.
Leave a Comment