<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Catholics take on Pope over birth control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:15:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe M</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44919</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44919</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Well gather round–”natural or rhythm ” indicates man’s ability to “bridle his passions”, hence not being enslaved to urges and desires. This would separate us from the animals who attack at will, whiz and dump at leisure, and mount anything, anyone,at anyplace if all fits. Artificial means permits us to join the lower animal kingdom without reproductive consequences.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

While I appreciate someone finally trying to explain this, I don&#039;t buy it. If delay f gratification was the point, then Catholics would still be encouraged to to have sex only when the woman is fertile for procreation. Rhythm method is &lt;i&gt;still&lt;/i&gt; for people who can&#039;t wait to get some and want it with less risk of a baby. 

I don&#039;t think anyone is saying that Catholics are the heavy, I personally am saying the Church is the heavy for failing to relinquish a method of sexual protection that is unsafe and unstable. Remember, if the Church decides to allow life-saving methods of contraception and protection, then all the Catholics will simply fall in line.

Also, the moral implications of this outdated method of birth control have to be considered: is the moral value of sexual restraint really that much more important than containing and preventing a deadly epidemic?

PS: Restraint is by far not the only thing that separates us from the &quot;lower order&quot; of animals and it would take more that just its loss to equate us with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Well gather round–”natural or rhythm ” indicates man’s ability to “bridle his passions”, hence not being enslaved to urges and desires. This would separate us from the animals who attack at will, whiz and dump at leisure, and mount anything, anyone,at anyplace if all fits. Artificial means permits us to join the lower animal kingdom without reproductive consequences.</p></blockquote>
<p>While I appreciate someone finally trying to explain this, I don&#8217;t buy it. If delay f gratification was the point, then Catholics would still be encouraged to to have sex only when the woman is fertile for procreation. Rhythm method is <i>still</i> for people who can&#8217;t wait to get some and want it with less risk of a baby. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone is saying that Catholics are the heavy, I personally am saying the Church is the heavy for failing to relinquish a method of sexual protection that is unsafe and unstable. Remember, if the Church decides to allow life-saving methods of contraception and protection, then all the Catholics will simply fall in line.</p>
<p>Also, the moral implications of this outdated method of birth control have to be considered: is the moral value of sexual restraint really that much more important than containing and preventing a deadly epidemic?</p>
<p>PS: Restraint is by far not the only thing that separates us from the &#8220;lower order&#8221; of animals and it would take more that just its loss to equate us with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outside The Perimeter: Fragments&#8230; &#171; kavips</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44907</link>
		<dc:creator>Outside The Perimeter: Fragments&#8230; &#171; kavips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44907</guid>
		<description>[...] out of his two month sabbatical, no doubt, because of the hostility given to his view posted in Delaware Liberal&#8217;s comment section regarding the pope. He applies scientific principals to the Catholic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out of his two month sabbatical, no doubt, because of the hostility given to his view posted in Delaware Liberal&#8217;s comment section regarding the pope. He applies scientific principals to the Catholic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kavips</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44901</link>
		<dc:creator>kavips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44901</guid>
		<description>Speaking for Shirley, based on her writings, I would guess that she would fight for man&#039;s right to &quot;roll in the hay&quot;.   (women&#039;s too.) (lol)  I sincerely hope my comment does not offend her, but that comment was set up far too nicely...and is just so.....well, ...Curmudgeous....... I tried to refrain for two seconds, but couldn&#039;t pass it up.......  I&#039;m so sorry....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking for Shirley, based on her writings, I would guess that she would fight for man&#8217;s right to &#8220;roll in the hay&#8221;.   (women&#8217;s too.) (lol)  I sincerely hope my comment does not offend her, but that comment was set up far too nicely&#8230;and is just so&#8230;..well, &#8230;Curmudgeous&#8230;&#8230;. I tried to refrain for two seconds, but couldn&#8217;t pass it up&#8230;&#8230;.  I&#8217;m so sorry&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalgeek</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44885</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44885</guid>
		<description>So, is your point that... well, I don&#039;t get your point.  Do you accept the notion that humans (and let&#039;s narrow it down to married humans for simplicity), have the right to &quot;roll in the hay&quot; at their mutual pleasure and to use birth control other than &quot;hope&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, is your point that&#8230; well, I don&#8217;t get your point.  Do you accept the notion that humans (and let&#8217;s narrow it down to married humans for simplicity), have the right to &#8220;roll in the hay&#8221; at their mutual pleasure and to use birth control other than &#8220;hope&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44868</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44868</guid>
		<description>Well gather round--&quot;natural or rhythm &quot; indicates man&#039;s ability to &quot;bridle his passions&quot;, hence not being enslaved to urges and desires.  This would separate us from the animals who attack at will, whiz and dump at leisure, and mount anything, anyone,at anyplace if all fits. Artificial means permits us to join the lower animal kingdom without reproductive consequences.Ironically, man has proven he can&#039;t handle the higher order concept of &quot;delayed gratification&quot;, or thinking outside the pants....so...we are left with an array of choices in birth control, because most can&#039;t practice this degree of self-control.  Procreation yes, recreation encouraged--full well knowing the responsibility of our actions.  But let&#039;s face it--most of us are just lions, and tigers and bunnies hopping around...having not evolved (actually matured) to the expectation that man should dominate this planet--BECAUSE he can think, evaluate and choose--unlike our animal cousins.  A whole new visual for a &quot;roll in the hay&quot;....The Catholics aren&#039;t the &quot;heavy&quot; here.  Man and his will are the walking advertisement for not doing &quot;the job&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well gather round&#8211;&#8221;natural or rhythm &#8221; indicates man&#8217;s ability to &#8220;bridle his passions&#8221;, hence not being enslaved to urges and desires.  This would separate us from the animals who attack at will, whiz and dump at leisure, and mount anything, anyone,at anyplace if all fits. Artificial means permits us to join the lower animal kingdom without reproductive consequences.Ironically, man has proven he can&#8217;t handle the higher order concept of &#8220;delayed gratification&#8221;, or thinking outside the pants&#8230;.so&#8230;we are left with an array of choices in birth control, because most can&#8217;t practice this degree of self-control.  Procreation yes, recreation encouraged&#8211;full well knowing the responsibility of our actions.  But let&#8217;s face it&#8211;most of us are just lions, and tigers and bunnies hopping around&#8230;having not evolved (actually matured) to the expectation that man should dominate this planet&#8211;BECAUSE he can think, evaluate and choose&#8211;unlike our animal cousins.  A whole new visual for a &#8220;roll in the hay&#8221;&#8230;.The Catholics aren&#8217;t the &#8220;heavy&#8221; here.  Man and his will are the walking advertisement for not doing &#8220;the job&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merit-bound Alley » Justified Hostility</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44651</link>
		<dc:creator>Merit-bound Alley » Justified Hostility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44651</guid>
		<description>[...] Pandora over at DL brought attention to a story about Catholic groups gathering a petition to the Pope for changing the Church&#8217;s views on birth control and sex education. I made the following comment which was described by another commenter as &#8220;hostile&#8221;: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pandora over at DL brought attention to a story about Catholic groups gathering a petition to the Pope for changing the Church&#8217;s views on birth control and sex education. I made the following comment which was described by another commenter as &#8220;hostile&#8221;: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44603</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44603</guid>
		<description>But doesn&#039;t the Rhythm Method (if successful) achieve the same means as artificial birth control?  I keep coming back to that conscious (willful) decision.

Basically both (BC and Rhythm) are designed not to produce a baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But doesn&#8217;t the Rhythm Method (if successful) achieve the same means as artificial birth control?  I keep coming back to that conscious (willful) decision.</p>
<p>Basically both (BC and Rhythm) are designed not to produce a baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44596</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44596</guid>
		<description>I think the difference, as far as I can tell, is that to deliberately impede or prevent the possibility of procreation through artificial means is not allowed, which does not occur (obviously) if a couple is abstinent. Abstinence in and of itself is not a sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the difference, as far as I can tell, is that to deliberately impede or prevent the possibility of procreation through artificial means is not allowed, which does not occur (obviously) if a couple is abstinent. Abstinence in and of itself is not a sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44581</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44581</guid>
		<description>My main point was about making a &quot;conscious&quot; decision not to procreate.  I wanted to know how deliberately not having sex (to avoid pregnancy) and using a condom were different.  Both strike me as willfully preventing pregnancy.

That&#039;s the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main point was about making a &#8220;conscious&#8221; decision not to procreate.  I wanted to know how deliberately not having sex (to avoid pregnancy) and using a condom were different.  Both strike me as willfully preventing pregnancy.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44579</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44579</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, those wishing for a more liberal or progressive church are probably going to be disappointed. I don&#039;t know that there&#039;s one voting age cardinal appointed by anyone other than John Paul II or Benedict. JPII changed the face and direction of the church (much of it for the better, BTW), reverting to a more conservative, centralized church.

Tom, the attitude toward the church here and elsewhere is often hostile, but I think the good folks who read DL would welcome your input.

The church does approve the rhythm method -- natural family planning -- because the couple isn&#039;t doing anything extraordinary to prevent pregnancy. The couple in that case is at least open to the possibility of procreation.

I am disappointed at times reading this and other blogs because I see how much good the Catholic Church does in so many areas. However, it has its faults and makes itself an easy target for critics. And there are definitely areas, such as birth control, where the church and I disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, those wishing for a more liberal or progressive church are probably going to be disappointed. I don&#8217;t know that there&#8217;s one voting age cardinal appointed by anyone other than John Paul II or Benedict. JPII changed the face and direction of the church (much of it for the better, BTW), reverting to a more conservative, centralized church.</p>
<p>Tom, the attitude toward the church here and elsewhere is often hostile, but I think the good folks who read DL would welcome your input.</p>
<p>The church does approve the rhythm method &#8212; natural family planning &#8212; because the couple isn&#8217;t doing anything extraordinary to prevent pregnancy. The couple in that case is at least open to the possibility of procreation.</p>
<p>I am disappointed at times reading this and other blogs because I see how much good the Catholic Church does in so many areas. However, it has its faults and makes itself an easy target for critics. And there are definitely areas, such as birth control, where the church and I disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44571</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44571</guid>
		<description>should be:

The battleground is Vatican politics, from which the next pope will emerge...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>should be:</p>
<p>The battleground is Vatican politics, from which the next pope will emerge&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44570</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44570</guid>
		<description>The way things change in the Church is you get a new pope. Benedict is 81 years old. 

Vatican politics, from which the next pope will emerge. The conservative factions have had the upper hand for decades. 

There are liberal factions in the Vatican. Unfortunately, many of them are U.S. based, and the US Church has been weakened by the pedophile scandals, so their influence is lessened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way things change in the Church is you get a new pope. Benedict is 81 years old. </p>
<p>Vatican politics, from which the next pope will emerge. The conservative factions have had the upper hand for decades. </p>
<p>There are liberal factions in the Vatican. Unfortunately, many of them are U.S. based, and the US Church has been weakened by the pedophile scandals, so their influence is lessened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe M</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44569</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44569</guid>
		<description>Tom, if you have a reasonable, well-thought-out argument supported by evidence, I would like to hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, if you have a reasonable, well-thought-out argument supported by evidence, I would like to hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pandora</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44568</link>
		<dc:creator>pandora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44568</guid>
		<description>Okay, Tom... please explain.  I&#039;m listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Tom&#8230; please explain.  I&#8217;m listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom S.</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/07/27/catholics-take-on-pope-over-birth-control/#comment-44567</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/?p=5586#comment-44567</guid>
		<description>I could explain it to you, but I think all you are interested in is picking on an institution you perceive as hostile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could explain it to you, but I think all you are interested in is picking on an institution you perceive as hostile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

