12 responses so far ↓

• 1 liberalgeek // Jul 18, 2008 at 1:04 pm

  You are killing me…

• 2 cassandra m // Jul 18, 2008 at 1:07 pm

  DTB is acting like a guy with a great life insurance policy that is totally paid up.

• 3 Delaware's Toughest Blogger // Jul 18, 2008 at 1:09 pm

  I’m baring arms buddy, don’t push me!

• 4 mike w. // Jul 18, 2008 at 1:24 pm

  Some prefer to deer hunt with bows rather than guns, that’s all.

• 5 Delaware's Toughest Blogger // Jul 18, 2008 at 1:33 pm

  you are comedy gold. I’m surprised you were 4th to comment. getting slow little guy?

• 6 RSmitty // Jul 18, 2008 at 1:50 pm

  I’m wondering how many people are picking up on the choice of words in this ad that even DT(H)B/DV pointed out: …ETHNICAL ARCHER…

  Don’t worry, D, I’m here to catch your comedy.

  FWIW, there has been a long debate among the most die-hard of game hunters over which is more ETHICAL (not ethNical): bow-hunting and fire-arms. This person pointing out his choice weaponry based on that isn’t really all that surprising.

• 7 delawaredem // Jul 18, 2008 at 1:53 pm

  Donviti has found his voice. We should not silence it.

• 8 Delaware's Toughest Blogger // Jul 18, 2008 at 1:54 pm

  insert Luciano Paveratti…..

  memememememememeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  MARIA, MARIA, MARIIIIIIIAAAAAAAAA

• 9 G Rex // Jul 18, 2008 at 2:03 pm

  A buddy of mine used to bowhunt because the season is longer than the rifle season, but after he only wounded a deer and had to track it for 3 hours before finally locating the carcass, he switched to muzzle loaders.

• 10 liz allen // Jul 18, 2008 at 3:56 pm

  It’s probably a native american, after all you europeans and others, have taken all the “happy hunting grounds”.

• 11 Disbelief // Jul 18, 2008 at 4:19 pm

  If he’s a native american, that would explain the “ethnical” modifier.

• 12 Art Downs // Jul 19, 2008 at 8:48 am

  I am not a hunter and a person who has rescued a number of creatures. This is a matter of taste and I am a devout carnivore. I prefer to put holes in inanimate targets or shatter clay than to perforate the skin of an animal.

  I am no puritan and champion the cause of those who choose to hunt and will welcome some venison.

  There are regulations that assure that the ammunition used for hunting is far more lethal than that used for miltary purposes. One does not want a deer suffering for days with an arrow in its side. Ammuntion mandated for hunting is forbidden for military use and for reasons that are more than humanitarian.

  Does ‘ethical’ mean my way or the highway? Perhaps that explains the ‘E’ in PETA.

Leave a Comment