Comments on: QOD http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/ Ground zero for all things political in Delaware Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:48:14 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: the cajun http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33351 the cajun Sat, 17 May 2008 00:13:24 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33351 Um, I'm confused...if you're "the Hottest Blogger" why would you have to rape anyone? Seems to me they'd be falling on your...oh, never mind. (grin) Um, I’m confused…if you’re “the Hottest Blogger” why would you have to rape anyone?
Seems to me they’d be falling on your…oh, never mind.

(grin)

]]> By: Von Cracker http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33193 Von Cracker Thu, 15 May 2008 16:25:38 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33193 Good question, Bundy....but how often does that happen? My guess is hardly ever (as in statistically insignificant), just like all those instances of Voter Fraud that precipitated the false need for a Gov't-issued photo ID in order to vote. Late-term abortions are/were used for the health of the mother, not as birth control. But to the question and its ‘crassness’: No, she shouldn’t be forced If you believe the wording of question is crass, then you should consider the all-to-frequent legislation proposed by conservatives, which sole purpose is to force you to answer DV’s question in the affirmative. …and here I thought the Conservopublicans appreciated “Plain-Speakingness” ;-) Good question, Bundy….but how often does that happen?

My guess is hardly ever (as in statistically insignificant), just like all those instances of Voter Fraud that precipitated the false need for a Gov’t-issued photo ID in order to vote.

Late-term abortions are/were used for the health of the mother, not as birth control.

But to the question and its ‘crassness’:

No, she shouldn’t be forced

If you believe the wording of question is crass, then you should consider the all-to-frequent legislation proposed by conservatives, which sole purpose is to force you to answer DV’s question in the affirmative.

…and here I thought the Conservopublicans appreciated “Plain-Speakingness” ;-)

]]> By: liberalgeek http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33182 liberalgeek Thu, 15 May 2008 14:40:42 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33182 That's what Bundy does. It is on-topic and not threatening. But, yes, creepy. That’s what Bundy does. It is on-topic and not threatening. But, yes, creepy.

]]> By: Dorian Gray http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33181 Dorian Gray Thu, 15 May 2008 14:31:41 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33181 Dude - What the hell are you talking about. I agree with Rick J. And, guys of DE Lib, I'd keep a close eye on Bundy. Why did he turn Donviti stupid attempt at humor into a harangue about partial birth abortion? That's actually just as creepy. Dude – What the hell are you talking about. I agree with Rick J.

And, guys of DE Lib, I’d keep a close eye on Bundy. Why did he turn Donviti stupid attempt at humor into a harangue about partial birth abortion? That’s actually just as creepy.

]]> By: anon http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33174 anon Thu, 15 May 2008 12:59:56 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33174 Unless of course the baby is lying next to a terrorist when you drop the bomb on the terrorist. Then it is unfortunate but OK. Unless of course the baby is lying next to a terrorist when you drop the bomb on the terrorist. Then it is unfortunate but OK.

]]> By: anon http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33173 anon Thu, 15 May 2008 12:59:00 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33173 No. You have to wait 18 years for that. No. You have to wait 18 years for that.

]]> By: A. Bundy http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33171 A. Bundy Thu, 15 May 2008 12:47:59 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33171 I have a question for you. Would it then be ok for a woman to wait 8 months and then partially deliver the baby...said baby being able to cry and breathing air own her own...only to have a drill driven into the soft spot on her skull forcefully enough to puncture her head and pierce her brain? Would that be ok? I have a question for you. Would it then be ok for a woman to wait 8 months and then partially deliver the baby…said baby being able to cry and breathing air own her own…only to have a drill driven into the soft spot on her skull forcefully enough to puncture her head and pierce her brain?

Would that be ok?

]]> By: jason330 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33169 jason330 Thu, 15 May 2008 12:17:47 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33169 If? If?

]]> By: RickJ19958 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33168 RickJ19958 Thu, 15 May 2008 11:57:28 +0000 http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/15/qod-15/#comment-33168 No. And you should be castrated. Not for the hypothetical rape, but for posing such a crass question. No. And you should be castrated.

Not for the hypothetical rape, but for posing such a crass question.

]]>