Comments on: GO JOE!!

By: Al Mascitti

Al Mascitti — Fri, 16 May 2008 12:40:19 +0000

Thank you for that one, kavips. The Sand Creek massacre also should not be forgotten. Can you say “genocide”?

But the fact is that just because we call the civilians we kill “collateral damage” doesn’t make it any nicer — except for those who support Bush foreign policy, of course.

By: kavips

kavips — Fri, 16 May 2008 08:17:23 +0000

No one can ever support terrorism at any cost…There is no reasonable, logical, moral, ethical, or rational motive for ever supporting terrorism.

I remember an incident where going in to the enemies camp, the terrorists finding no men, who were out in the hills planning their attack, killed every woman and underage child. Those family members were burnt alive, beheaded alive, mutilated, especially the children………

It was a Republican president who signed the order to destroy the village of Wounded Knee.

One should never, never talk to those despicable personages again.

By: Call It

Call It — Fri, 16 May 2008 06:09:41 +0000

“some people” believe the United States “should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along.”

What is wrong with this statement? Someone tell me please.

What is wrong with it? Hmmm… maybe what’s wrong is the fact that you are even considering what that man’s opinion is on foreign policy. I get supporting your guy. I get that Bush may be a nice dude. I get that you want to support our commander in chief. BUT, the minute you start spewing bullshit about his foreign policy being even in the vicinity of semi-correct, you lose any and all credibility.

Sorry A. No way around this one.

By: Al Mascitti

Al Mascitti — Fri, 16 May 2008 02:57:13 +0000

“some people” believe the United States “should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along.” What is wrong with this statement?

What’s wrong with the statement is that Hamas is an elected government. This isn’t Arafat and the PLO. They held an election, just like we wanted, and elected Hamas. We are in no moral position to preach to anyone. Terrorists could only dream of killing the numbers we have killed in the name of freedom. Cripes, you’re so clueless you have me sounding like Liz Allen.

By: jason330

jason330 — Fri, 16 May 2008 02:23:21 +0000

What an idiot you are Bundy. You crack me up.

You list this:

“Joe Biden Used Tax Payer Money To Facilitate His Adultery”

as an example of a post that “destroyed” Joe Biden. Did you even read it?

No.

You kill me with you half-assed bullshit,

By: From Pine View Farm » “Words Fail Me . . .”

From Pine View Farm » “Words Fail Me . . .” — Fri, 16 May 2008 01:29:36 +0000

[...] Fortunately, they did not fail Brendan , who delves in the record of how the Bushes got their riches; nor did they fail Mithras, nor did they fail Joe. [...]

By: Truth Teller

Truth Teller — Fri, 16 May 2008 00:50:58 +0000

Edwards couldn’t carry his home state of North Carolina in the last election. As far as AG goes Hill is ok maybe she is just the type who would put Bush and the Veep on trial for their WAR CRIMES

By: Savy Politico

Savy Politico — Fri, 16 May 2008 00:35:50 +0000

Try this:

Edwards for V.P.
Joe for Sec. State
Hill for A.G.

I like it!!!!

By: cassandra m

cassandra m — Thu, 15 May 2008 23:55:53 +0000

That was a great article. Dems all rolled out quickly and decisively to smack back this new bit of unseemliness from the President of the United States. And props to HRC for joining in the fray. More of this please, guys and girls. Lieberman, predictably, is the exception.

By: pandora

pandora — Thu, 15 May 2008 23:53:10 +0000

It’s the old good and evil, you’re either with us or against us argument. And that’s an argument I’m happy to lose.

By: liberalgeek

liberalgeek — Thu, 15 May 2008 23:12:21 +0000

Actually, A, check out the story “Joe Biden Used Tax Payer Money To Facilitate His Adultery” it isn’t what it sounds like… Think Guiliani

So the real question is why should we always agree with Joe? When he says something that we agree with, we say so. If he sucks, we say so.

In this very freakin’ thread, you accuse us of always supporting Obama, which is also not true. Do you want us to only cheer for our side or to weigh in as we see fit, based on the current situation? I guess we lose either way.

By: anon

anon — Thu, 15 May 2008 22:41:14 +0000

, Biden is a gutless loser, lazy, spineless adulterer screw-up

*yawn* …. wake me up when you have a picture of Biden drunk.

By: Von Cracker

Von Cracker — Thu, 15 May 2008 22:38:01 +0000

So it’s ‘either – or” for you, Al?

Piss ya off once and you’re done. Ah..I get it now…

By: Delaware's Hottest Blogger

Delaware's Hottest Blogger — Thu, 15 May 2008 22:30:37 +0000

biden is ripping the president right now on CNN

By: Truth Teller

Truth Teller — Thu, 15 May 2008 22:20:59 +0000

Hey Bundy I noticed that also you are very observent