<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QOD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/</link>
	<description>Ground zero for all things political in Delaware</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:49:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bleVins for Vendetta &#171; Call It</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-33178</link>
		<dc:creator>bleVins for Vendetta &#171; Call It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-33178</guid>
		<description>[...] for&#160;Vendetta  About a week back, I was having a discussion on the comment board over at DelawareLiberal about writing in the candidate for whom you identify with most if they happen to not be on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for&nbsp;Vendetta  About a week back, I was having a discussion on the comment board over at DelawareLiberal about writing in the candidate for whom you identify with most if they happen to not be on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FSP</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32372</link>
		<dc:creator>FSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32372</guid>
		<description>Finally, the bill actually got voted on once and failed before they brought it back and passed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, the bill actually got voted on once and failed before they brought it back and passed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FSP</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32370</link>
		<dc:creator>FSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32370</guid>
		<description>Senator Gary Simpson (R-Milford) said “If it was proven a month before an election that I had committed an heinous crime against society, my constituents absolutely should have the right and the mechanism to elect a person of their choice via the write-in ballot, even if that person did not meet some arbitrary deadline for ‘declaring’ a certain number of days ahead of time.” 

On the positive side, Senator Colin Bonini (R-Dover South) said “What if, a month before an election, people learn that one of their neighbors has provided some remarkable service to the community and decide that person is the very best choice to represent them as their next Senator.  They should have the right to vote for that person by write-in and to have their vote counted.   This bill is ‘anti-democratic’, taking basic rights away from voters that should stay in their hands.  In America, government should not be in the business of telling people who they can vote for.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Gary Simpson (R-Milford) said “If it was proven a month before an election that I had committed an heinous crime against society, my constituents absolutely should have the right and the mechanism to elect a person of their choice via the write-in ballot, even if that person did not meet some arbitrary deadline for ‘declaring’ a certain number of days ahead of time.” </p>
<p>On the positive side, Senator Colin Bonini (R-Dover South) said “What if, a month before an election, people learn that one of their neighbors has provided some remarkable service to the community and decide that person is the very best choice to represent them as their next Senator.  They should have the right to vote for that person by write-in and to have their vote counted.   This bill is ‘anti-democratic’, taking basic rights away from voters that should stay in their hands.  In America, government should not be in the business of telling people who they can vote for.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FSP</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32369</link>
		<dc:creator>FSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32369</guid>
		<description>And the reasoning behind it is baloney. Even John Atkins had to disclose the independent expenditures that funded his write-in effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the reasoning behind it is baloney. Even John Atkins had to disclose the independent expenditures that funded his write-in effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FSP</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32368</link>
		<dc:creator>FSP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32368</guid>
		<description>The write-in bill passed the Senate yesterday. All of the Senate Republicans voted against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The write-in bill passed the Senate yesterday. All of the Senate Republicans voted against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32367</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 21:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32367</guid>
		<description>Hey, this write-in bill passed the Senate but is sitting in a House committee right now...

Paging Dave Burris!!

Calling Charlie Copeland!!

Anybody???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, this write-in bill passed the Senate but is sitting in a House committee right now&#8230;</p>
<p>Paging Dave Burris!!</p>
<p>Calling Charlie Copeland!!</p>
<p>Anybody???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call It</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32366</link>
		<dc:creator>Call It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32366</guid>
		<description>anon

I agree with what you are saying. When I read the bill it is easy to understand what the reasoning behind it is. They want to be able to keep someone from having a funded campaign without paying all the fees and yadda yadda. I am just curious what brought on this bill? I could see if there was some semi-successful write-in campaign, but there hasn&#039;t been one, and I doubt there ever will be. This law smells of two parties keeping the masses under their wings. It is completely fucked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anon</p>
<p>I agree with what you are saying. When I read the bill it is easy to understand what the reasoning behind it is. They want to be able to keep someone from having a funded campaign without paying all the fees and yadda yadda. I am just curious what brought on this bill? I could see if there was some semi-successful write-in campaign, but there hasn&#8217;t been one, and I doubt there ever will be. This law smells of two parties keeping the masses under their wings. It is completely fucked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call It</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32365</link>
		<dc:creator>Call It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32365</guid>
		<description>Thanks cassandra

I just emailed Senator Blevins, which I am going to assume will most likely lead to a bullshit response or no response at all. I am going to email the NJ (a lot of good that&#039;ll do) and hopefully you all can get some press out there about this. It may not seem very important, but it is. It is just another liberty that is being taken away from us by elected officials. 

Fuck them, we can do this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks cassandra</p>
<p>I just emailed Senator Blevins, which I am going to assume will most likely lead to a bullshit response or no response at all. I am going to email the NJ (a lot of good that&#8217;ll do) and hopefully you all can get some press out there about this. It may not seem very important, but it is. It is just another liberty that is being taken away from us by elected officials. </p>
<p>Fuck them, we can do this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32364</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32364</guid>
		<description>Devil&#039;s advocate here, maybe it is kind of good to prevent secretly funded write-in candidacies from becoming prevalent. 

Can you imagine if Bill Lee declined the nomination, but in September you began seeing huge bill b0ards, nonstop radio ads and glossy campaign mailers - funded by God knows who -  all urging you to write in &quot;Bill Lee?&quot;

Even a moron can spell Bill Lee!

I don&#039;t like the idea of a law that says my vote won&#039;t be counted. That&#039;s gotta be illegal somewhere somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Devil&#8217;s advocate here, maybe it is kind of good to prevent secretly funded write-in candidacies from becoming prevalent. </p>
<p>Can you imagine if Bill Lee declined the nomination, but in September you began seeing huge bill b0ards, nonstop radio ads and glossy campaign mailers &#8211; funded by God knows who &#8211;  all urging you to write in &#8220;Bill Lee?&#8221;</p>
<p>Even a moron can spell Bill Lee!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the idea of a law that says my vote won&#8217;t be counted. That&#8217;s gotta be illegal somewhere somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RSmitty</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32363</link>
		<dc:creator>RSmitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32363</guid>
		<description>OK, I am wondering...can there be a law that prevents someone from running because they don&#039;t have the money?  I know there are filing fees, but aren&#039;t they party-mandated?  I thought being a write-in was a way for Joe Shmoe, who is dirt-poor, to run.

I admit I am pulling that out of my arse, but I thought that was the case.  If so, this could be an angle in.  If not, well, crap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I am wondering&#8230;can there be a law that prevents someone from running because they don&#8217;t have the money?  I know there are filing fees, but aren&#8217;t they party-mandated?  I thought being a write-in was a way for Joe Shmoe, who is dirt-poor, to run.</p>
<p>I admit I am pulling that out of my arse, but I thought that was the case.  If so, this could be an angle in.  If not, well, crap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cassandra m</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32362</link>
		<dc:creator>cassandra m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32362</guid>
		<description>Welcome Call It!

LG did have my thoughts on this -- could we get a couple of hundred folks to file the paperwork (if there are no fees) in the last week of filing to gum up th system?  Just some basic monkey wrenching.  No campaigning necessary.

But you are right, this is crazy -- having to file before a write-in campaign defeats the purpose, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome Call It!</p>
<p>LG did have my thoughts on this &#8212; could we get a couple of hundred folks to file the paperwork (if there are no fees) in the last week of filing to gum up th system?  Just some basic monkey wrenching.  No campaigning necessary.</p>
<p>But you are right, this is crazy &#8212; having to file before a write-in campaign defeats the purpose, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call It</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32359</link>
		<dc:creator>Call It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32359</guid>
		<description>Yeah...
I am just so incredibly angry right now. I have yet to decide on who I will ultimately vote for, but there is still a chance that person may not be on the ballot. And I am not just talking about the presidency...it goes all the way down the ballot.  So this idea that no matter who I decide on, I would still be able to vote for (write in) who I thought best represented me, has brought me a lot of fucking comfort in this excruciatingly long democratic process. I am in fucking shock right now.

Thanks for the welcome too Since I began reading a while back, you guys have given me some nice daily thoughts to ponder over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;<br />
I am just so incredibly angry right now. I have yet to decide on who I will ultimately vote for, but there is still a chance that person may not be on the ballot. And I am not just talking about the presidency&#8230;it goes all the way down the ballot.  So this idea that no matter who I decide on, I would still be able to vote for (write in) who I thought best represented me, has brought me a lot of fucking comfort in this excruciatingly long democratic process. I am in fucking shock right now.</p>
<p>Thanks for the welcome too Since I began reading a while back, you guys have given me some nice daily thoughts to ponder over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalgeek</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32358</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32358</guid>
		<description>Oh, and welcome to Delaware Liberal.  We&#039;re glad you&#039;re here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and welcome to Delaware Liberal.  We&#8217;re glad you&#8217;re here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liberalgeek</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32357</link>
		<dc:creator>liberalgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32357</guid>
		<description>Call It, I think Cassandra was suggesting that we break their system by having thousands of applications for write-in candidacies filed.  They claim that there is no cost to this law, but we could certainly add costs that would make this a foolish rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call It, I think Cassandra was suggesting that we break their system by having thousands of applications for write-in candidacies filed.  They claim that there is no cost to this law, but we could certainly add costs that would make this a foolish rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Call It</title>
		<link>http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32356</link>
		<dc:creator>Call It</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 20:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.delawareliberal.net/2008/05/07/qod-10/#comment-32356</guid>
		<description>Cassandra,

I think the design behind the bill is to stop someone from running for office without filing the proper fees and reporting their finances. For example, LG could post here that he wants to run for governor and for us to write him in. He could have a massive online driven campaign and do some serious damage. That is what the bill is designed to curb in my opinion. It is fucking sick.

And on another note, maybe I am just bitter right now, but &quot;testing the limits&quot; of our election office would do the same thing Rush Limbaugh wanted to do in Operation Chaos.... Make a mockery of the process.

Fuck, I am so pissed right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cassandra,</p>
<p>I think the design behind the bill is to stop someone from running for office without filing the proper fees and reporting their finances. For example, LG could post here that he wants to run for governor and for us to write him in. He could have a massive online driven campaign and do some serious damage. That is what the bill is designed to curb in my opinion. It is fucking sick.</p>
<p>And on another note, maybe I am just bitter right now, but &#8220;testing the limits&#8221; of our election office would do the same thing Rush Limbaugh wanted to do in Operation Chaos&#8230;. Make a mockery of the process.</p>
<p>Fuck, I am so pissed right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

