I suspect Dave often states and suggests many things he either knows not to be true or believes is not true in the realm of local & state politics.

~
Dana Garrett often states and suggests many things that he either knows not to be true or believes is not true in the realm of local and state politics.

You troll the intertubes creating ‘files’ on me that you then distribute to create ‘disturbances of great import’ like an idiotic ’spy vs spy’ routine.

To you, my comments were an insidious PLOT and ACTIVE LIES blah blah blah. As I said, I wrote what I thought was STILL true. All you are offering is that it is no longer true that she is employed in such a capacity.

And Dana. A reasonable person would, when a correction should be made, MAKE IT. Why didn’t you print a correction if you thought one was warranted? Your ’spy vs spy’ program was instead to hustle this EVENT to Kowalko and lurk in the dark shadows in order to savor what your insipid imagination was a grand gotcha of one of your ‘evil enemies’ yours truly.

If you were in the least bit normal, you would have corrected what I wrote in the spirit in which it was written. Not once will you, and evidently John Kowalko, deny the facts that Dave wrote about his adamant stand against transparency. That is what I find most curious here. That is all that is relevant here. The notion of ethics was tangental to the post topic which your unnecessary and idiotic rantings have tried to divert away from is that Kowalko was not acting in my best interests here.

Mrs. Kowalko may have left the CSD, that does not change that fact that she sat on the school board when Joe Wise was hired and that she voted for many of the actions that took the school district into ruin and that she took a fat cat job from the sleazoid guy that she helped hire. There is not much there to be proud of IMHO and my taxes are paying for those mistakes and the kids in my district are paying for those mistakes.

So do go on Dana Garrett with your ’spy games’ but if you want respect and not just the union money that you are most likely collecting for your contortuous antics, then simply feed into the intertube conversations as a part of the blogging community and stop being an adversary.

John is a big boy. If he had information that countered what I believed to be true (and he did because you obviously chose to feed him your NANCY IS AN EVIL BITCH file) then he should have just written it into the record or asked you to do so.

You both are showing some pretty strange behavior here.

Yes, good example.

Let’s face it. Copeland can take positions on things he knows Adams will never allow. That’s easy for him to do. Like SB4. He was for it, but when it came time to actually get it out for a vote, Copeland tucked his tail between his legs and headed for the hills.

The Repubs want to run on open government. They sure as hell don’t want to enact it.

You don’t have to admit you lied. You got caught red-handed. It’s crystal clear to all.

“one of us” How interesting. It’s Dave’s post, but you include yourself in it. Is your identity so enmeshed w/ Dave’s that his actions are somehow identical to yours in your sycophantic mind?

Now as to your point. I don’t think Dave believes Protack committed vandalism or anyone else did as a political act. I believe he intended to create the suspicion that someone did it as a political act.

I suspect Dave often states and suggests many things he either knows not to be true or believes is not true in the realm of local & state politics.

Sincerity isn’t a relevant consideration most often w/ people like Dave, but their Machiavellian purposes are.

We’ll never be able to convince you of where you’re wrong, but I will at least say it to your plugged up ears (figuratively speaking, of course). While we obviously have issues with some (not all) of Protack’s supporters and the man himself, there isn’t one of us that would suspect them of vandalism.

Ah, don’t let that stop you, though. Your mission has become very apparent to destroy Burris’ life, so go ahead while we watch your swings and jabs.

Do you dream about him in any form, whether it be nightmares of liking him or wet ones of burying him? I just wonder how much of your day is spent with Dave on your mind.

Sincerely,
Lickspittle

do you mean when dave says stuff like,

I’m sure Copeland knows that the documents in question will show that he had nothing to do with Speck other than attending one breakfast meeting in a crowded restaurant with a bunch of other people.

I can find more. It’s not that hard to back you up

What a freaking joke. You allege and suggest horseshit all the time w/ providing proof more than anyone I know.

You don’t deserve the consideration you almost never give to others.

Like this one:

“just like the House GOP caucus did this year and tell him to lay off”

That is a lie. I have never been “hauled” before anyone and told to lay off. Prove it happened.

Is there some Guiness Book “Most lies told about one person” record you’re trying to break?

I think we can all agree that – yes – Dave was thinking that it was a possibility. ”

Yes, anyone could see that was his suggestion. Protack or the Dems set the fire.

But poor Dave got humiliated yesterday because Copeland gave no credence whatsoever to the conspiracy theory. I recorded it.

I wonder what will happen now. Will the Senate GOP caucus haul his but before them about his dirty tricks just like the House GOP caucus did this year and tell him to lay off?

Behavior like Burris’ post and his arrogance while he’s Leg Hall are the reasons why all but 5 GOP legs find Dave to be an embarrassment and liability to the party and their efforts.

He’s a blowhard that even the legislative staff find comical.