Stop shifting the topic. You made serious unsubstantiated claims about him.

You are OBLIGATED to prove them.

Where’s the proof, Nancy?

I don’t believe you were told any such thing. I don’t believe you even got any phone calls about it. I believe you made the story of the phone call up to give you cover for dropping another invented smear on the internet about Bullock.

The reason you aren’t looking it up and are telling me to do so is because you can’t look it up…because the “evidence doesn’t exist.

You lied about the entire thing just like the other lies you invented about Bullock as well as the lies you spreads about Potter.

You are really an utterly despicable person.

You’ll get caught in something you can’t wiggle out of, Nancy. It’s bound to happen. It certainly needs to.

That leads from the information where Dana claimed that he was told of some 50K that would come his way if he ran for General Assembly in 2006 combined with his association with Korn.

It is another assumption, indeed, that it was Korn who promised Garrett these funds.

Was it Korn who also promised the good pastor his $$ [from Garrett’s ‘DC bigwigs’] that was never forthcoming? Good guess.

And, considering the froth emitting from Garrett’s mouth and the known lack of his employment, is Korn funding Garrett’s evil diatribes?”

Look at this crap she is making up OUT OF THIN AIR. None of this has any basis in reality. It’s pure supposition on her part (and also totally untrue) and yet she flings it forth.

So, Smitty, Nancy has proven why what I said about her isn’t libel. It’s yet one more example of her being “devious, underhanded,” and showing she should “not to be trusted at all.”

["IMO, what you said directly about Nancy’s character is worse than being called something that identifies a political ideology." Of course you "think" that. It serves the purpose of excusing your buddy for libeling me.]

And why is Nancy now throwing this bit of smoke in the air? Because she spread another rumor about Bullock having 5 sexual harassment charges against him and when challenged to offer the proof, she has ONCE MORE failed to do so.

Readers, when does it become clear that Nancy NEVER OFFERS PROOF for her slanders because IT DOESN’T EXIST.

Whether it’s Bullock or Potter or now me–she invents bullshit about people and spreads it around as if it were true or highly probable.

She is devious, underhanded, and not to be trusted.

NANCY WILLING , WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT CHRIS BULLOCK HAS 5 SEXUAL HARASSMENT CHARGES AGAINST HIM?

Produce it, Nancy. Stop try to divert the subject that YOU HAVE NOT PRODUCED ONE IOTA OF EVIDENCE of any of your libels against Bullock.

http://www.castle.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=564

I just figured Jensen got tired of Mike Protack calling in to show off his knowledge on every single subject.

How in the world is…

Nancy Willing is devious, underhanded, and not to be trusted at all…

any different from the reasons you scream “LIBEL” at people calling you a socialist? You just disparaged her character in plain sight right there. Don’t twist this by comparing “socialist” to what you said about Nancy. IMO, what you said directly about Nancy’s character is worse than being called something that identifies a political ideology.

No, I am not advocating a lawsuit, but I am pointing out that it is apparently OK for you, whereas it’s tragically wrong for others.

Ooo, that’s right, you won’t see this, because you ignore me…a common bore. JA.

I am going to assume that Dana Garrett is a tool of Richard Korn.

I am going to assume that Garrett’s recent anti-Coons slants is generated from Korn.

That leads from the information where Dana claimed that he was told of some 50K that would come his way if he ran for General Assembly in 2006 combined with his association with Korn.

It is another assumption, indeed, that it was Korn who promised Garrett these funds.

Was it Korn who also promised the good pastor his $$ [from Garrett's 'DC bigwigs'] that was never forthcoming? Good guess.

And, considering the froth emitting from Garrett’s mouth and the known lack of his employment, is Korn funding Garrett’s evil diatribes?

Just sayin’.

Bull. I like Bullock and you are spreading UNSUBSTANTIATED RUMORS about Bullock, even when you pretend you are n0t doing so AND I CAN PROVE IT:

“there is a record in the court system of no less than 5 sexual harrassment charges filed against Bullock.”

Those are your words, Nancy. You put them out there above. You can’t beg off printing another UNSUBSTANTIATED, reputation-damaging RUMOR on the basis of another UNSUBSTANTIATED claim that you got phone calls from people about it.

There is the proof, readers. This is what Nancy Willing does. This is how she spreads vicious smears about people, knowing how damaging they are BUT TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROVING THEM before she prints them.

Nancy Willing is devious, underhanded, and not to be trusted at all.

So far, it seems to be working; we are getting many more new callers under this policy than the old one.