About jason330

author photo

Jason330 is a deep cover double agent working for the GOP. Don't tell anybody.

See All Posts by jason330

Great Wind Project Blogging From FSP

March 1st, 2008 • Related • Filed Under
By jason330
YouTube Preview Image

I still call it FSP. I’m old school.

There Are 17 Responses So Far. »

  1. Comment by Protack for Governor on 1 March 2008 at 7:33 pm:

    The below is self serving but our campaign will highlight renewable energy for Delaware including bringing wind power to homes, farms and businesses.

    Press Event

    Delaware’s Energy Future

    Wednesday March 5th at 11 Am

    Flexera Inc.
    28381 DuPont Blvd Unit 3
    Millsboro, De

    302 934 5360 (O)

    Candidate For Governor Mike Protack will lay out an innovative plan for Delaware’s energy future at a Flexera Inc by revealing the
    Delaware Energy Sustainability Plan.

    Come hear about the exciting people,technology and products which exist in Delaware plus the plan to bring Delaware into the 21st Century for energy sustainability.

    Contact the campaign at 302 690 3946

  2. Comment by Dana Garrett on 1 March 2008 at 10:45 pm:

    I believe Burris posted the stuff about Nelson because he is a possible candidate against Rep. Hoecker (R)(see Dave’s 2nd film), the person who recently criticized Dave about his latest attack on Atkins.

    http://www.wgmd.com/blog/2008/02/25/state-rep-hocker-bangs-blogger-burris/

    We now know what it takes to get Burris to break ranks w/ an incumbent Republican. Have the Republican wound Dave’s ego and reputation and partisanship for the incumbent GOPer flies out the window.

    I just cannot believe Dave made this film out of principle. If Nancy Wagner rigging the state budget to give her hubby a job is not enough to rouse his principles , or his failure to rebuke Copeland for playing footsy w/ DP&L won’t do it, why would Dave give one whit about the views of an ex-talk show host concerning windmills?

    This is payback to Hoecker, plain & simple.

  3. Comment by KnowledgeIsPower on 1 March 2008 at 11:23 pm:

    Why do you care, man? You’re obsessed with Burris, dude, and it’s fucking eerie. Like restraining order weird. Get help.

  4. Comment by Dana Garrett on 1 March 2008 at 11:47 pm:

    I thought the point of making comments is to give your opinion on the provided post. Mine is that Dave’s reason to post it is suspect and so “coincidental” in fact I can’t imagine why your comment isn’t “Hmmm…yes, that sounds reasonable.”

    Think about it. Dave Burris attempting to sabotage an incumbent elected DE Repub not up on Ethics charges–where have you ever seen that in his writings before?

    I can’t think of a single instance. You, actually, don’t find that noteworthy? Really?

  5. Comment by Brian on 2 March 2008 at 2:24 am:

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080301/ap_on_re_as/china_maglev_protest;_ylt=AqQe6FikFHNBwnfBVJL.LyIBxg8F

    Where is our maglev train?

  6. Comment by jason330 on 2 March 2008 at 8:38 am:

    Dana –

    I didn;t see the second video because I was pressed for time. I surprised byu how directly this one called out the Senators on both sides of the isle who are in Delmarva’s pocket.

    If the second one goes on to knock Hocker then that is interesting.

    Dave has a bright line when it comes to calling out republicans that he does not cross.

  7. Comment by jason330 on 2 March 2008 at 8:56 am:

    Just watched it.

    TRIAL BALLOOOOOOOOOOON !!!!!

  8. Comment by Dana Garrett on 2 March 2008 at 1:06 pm:

    Told you so.

    You just don’t cross Delaware’s Hatchet Man without paying the price.

    The stories are coming out of the woodwork. I just got off the phone about another one.

    We never knew him.

  9. Comment by Al Mascitti on 2 March 2008 at 1:13 pm:

    If someone takes out Hocker, does it matter why? Or should we support him because his district elects him?

    It’s like the Republicans and FOIA law — do you really think they believe in the principle? Of course not — they’re doing it to embarrass the Democrats.

    Take a look at the manufactured housing bills for a picture of what will happen if the Senate gets rid of the desk drawer veto. There are other ways of stifling the will of the people, and if the desk-drawer veto disappears, Senate Dems will simply switch to the method the oh-so-principled House Republicans are using.

    The lesson, for those of us interested in good government and the public good, is to take advantage of splits in the incumbent consensus whenever one opens up.

  10. Comment by jason330 on 2 March 2008 at 1:29 pm:

    The lesson, for those of us interested in good government and the public good, is to take advantage of splits in the incumbent consensus whenever one opens up.

    Man oh man that is hitting the naill on the head. Once elected it does not take long for people to realize that their true party is the Incumbent party.

    Everything else is PR.

  11. Comment by Al Mascitti on 2 March 2008 at 1:58 pm:

    Jason: I agree, except for one big exception: John Kowalko. He has resisted enormous pressure from his caucus leaders to quash his good-government instincts, despite great personal risk to his seat.

  12. Comment by KnowledgeIsPower on 2 March 2008 at 3:44 pm:

    The stories are coming out of the woodwork. I just got off the phone about another one.

    Let me guess. It happened in Jane Brady’s chambers or your sworn to secrecy. Which is it?

    You just don’t cross Delaware’s Hatchet Man without paying the price.

    You’re talking about yourself, right? You’re much more agile with the hatchet than Burris is. I know. I’m one of your attempted victims.

    Look at yourself, dude. Your entire pathetic jobless life right now is dedicated to trying to bury your much-used hatchet as far into Burris’s back as is humanly possible.

    Glass houses and stones, dude. Think about it.

  13. Comment by Dana Garrett on 2 March 2008 at 4:37 pm:

    Al,

    I don’t give a damn about Hocker and rather like Nelson. I’d probably support him.

    I heard that Nancy Wagner has an opponent. Where is the film about him? That’s my point.

  14. Comment by Dana Garrett on 2 March 2008 at 4:44 pm:

    “I’m one of your attempted victims.”

    It’s flattering to know that you have to now hide behind a mask because if you were to challenge me using your real name, you couldn’t stand weight of evidence against you.

    Instead of reflecting about me, perhaps you should reflect on yourself: why can’t you take me on unless you wear a mask? What have you done to cause you to hide?

    You need to change yourself.

  15. Comment by KnowledgeIsPower on 2 March 2008 at 7:54 pm:

    No way, dude. I’m scared of you. You’re obsessive and I don’t think you’re mentally well. I’d fear for my family if I took you on publicly, and that’s just not worth it. I feel that everyone who reads you can tell that you’re 50% full of shit and 50% full of anger. I think people can see that on their own.

  16. Comment by Dana Garrett on 3 March 2008 at 1:13 am:

    Knowledge says I’m obsessive. Yet I didn’t open a line of attack on him. He opened it on me on Post #3. I fired it back and that was uncalled for according to him.

    See what I mean about these people? They start it and then cry foul if the other person finishes it. Or to put it in other terms, they dish it out but can’t take it.

    Just little babies….

  17. Pingback by Outside the Perimeter: The People Don’t Matter Edition « kavips on 3 March 2008 at 3:48 pm:

    [...] be well advised to rethink their position. You can reach the interview from here or ……..here. (just to show the broad breadth of [...]