I’m interested in Dana’s take because it seems to me that he either has to be thinking , “I think Dave is an “open government” guy even though this PAC flap does not demostrate it.”
- OR -
“I’ve been sold a bill of goods.”
Dana, What’s your take on the DCCC pac?
November 2nd, 2007 by jason330 · 9 Comments
Tags: Uncategorized
9 responses so far ↓
1 disbelief // Nov 2, 2007 at 9:18 am
Dana, you’re not the first guy to get Bushwhacked by the GOP.
2 anon // Nov 2, 2007 at 10:33 am
- OR -
“You cultists will stop at nothing to win an election.”
3 anon // Nov 2, 2007 at 12:23 pm
If this PAC bothers him I don’t think we will hear about it from him anytime soon.
IMHO Dana has concluded that the way to get to open government is to flip the Senate Republican no matter what. Last year Dana endorsed the Republican in 5 out of 7 Senate races.
Lord knows if it was a last-minute PAC supporting a Dem Senate candidate Dana would be all over it.
4 Dana Garrett // Nov 2, 2007 at 1:57 pm
I’ve answered you:
http://delawarewatch.blogspot.com/2007/11/jason-scotts-latest-tempest-in-teapot.html
Once again you let your partisanship make you illogical and, in this case, Cohen’s motives for her silly piece.
5 disbelief // Nov 2, 2007 at 2:34 pm
So surreptitious yet legal campaign donations, hidden from the voters until after the election, proves that Christian is for open government?
Sounds like protesting the slaughter of fur bearing animals by fucking sheep.
6 G Rex // Nov 2, 2007 at 3:07 pm
Not baaaaaaaad, Dis.
7 disbelief // Nov 2, 2007 at 3:25 pm
You get the hip-boots, G, and meet me in Sussex County Saturday night. I know some sheep down there. All you have to do is yell “War on Terror, your cooperation is required” and they’ll lift their cute little tails in a NY minute. We’ll tell ‘em we’re donating to their PAC fund.
8 Dana Garrett // Nov 2, 2007 at 3:59 pm
Disbelief,
You make a common mistake made by stylistic progressives who are really establishment Democrats. You think wittiness can substitute for argument.
You should think about the DE Dem candidates who support open government and who receive money from DE PACs that have the same reporting time frames and how we would ridicule anyone who argued that because the Dem candidates received money from the PAC that must mean they are lying about their support for open government.
It’s illogical, fallacious.
I realize pointing pointing it out involves no wittiness and lacks the glitter you find irresitable but it is correct and sound.
9 disbelief // Nov 2, 2007 at 4:37 pm
I’ve never done fallacious in my life. Maybe when I’m drunk, donviti’s hotness tempts me, but I remain,
heterosexually yours,
Dis
Leave a Comment